It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Neanderthals, homo sapiens sapiens, homo erectus, Hobbits, they all existed simultaneously and there is absolutely no proof that one of those species evolved from another one. This "scientific" idea is exhausted and it is really very suspicious that some people still try to perpetuate it.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by DangerDeath
Neanderthals, homo sapiens sapiens, homo erectus, Hobbits, they all existed simultaneously and there is absolutely no proof that one of those species evolved from another one. This "scientific" idea is exhausted and it is really very suspicious that some people still try to perpetuate it.
What is your alternative? Everything you are looking at right now is an outcome of science. Computer, screen, keyboard, plastics etc. Listening to music? How was that created? Instruments, recording studio, mp3 technology etc. I'll assume you're clothed? Design, materials, stores, transport, washing powder, washing machines etc Hungry? Food production, processing, packaging etc. The 'scientific' idea is all we have.
You use scientific terms 'neanderthals, homo sapiens' etc. Hitting an animal with a club was a scientific thought. Producing stone tools was scientific. Such thoughts led to us being in control of our environment. When our earliest ancestors used sticks to winkle maggots out of tree bark, that simple action has put satellites around the Earth. It's created inoculations to disease and placed a gun in a crackhead's hand It's all science dude!
If you or a loved one ever requires a blood transfusion or organ transplant, we can only hope that such a thing as species exists. Let's also hope that the 'political agenda' has provided a hospital equipped with trained staff and the equipment necessary.
My "alternative" is more a proof than there is a proof that even such thing as species exists.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by DangerDeath
If you or a loved one ever requires a blood transfusion or organ transplant, we can only hope that such a thing as species exists. Let's also hope that the 'political agenda' has provided a hospital equipped with trained staff and the equipment necessary.
My "alternative" is more a proof than there is a proof that even such thing as species exists.
You can even get pig organs, because they are compatible, so much for this proof..
SC: Whilst I do enjoy reading your bluster and find it quite humerous (honestly), that's all you have.
]Kandinsky: Bit of bluster, subject knowledge, links to evidence and supported documents. Throw in an academic education as experience of the 'lying academics' you refer to and it becomes clear you have even less than bluster...
Kandinsky: I didn't concede the possibility of PCPE in any sense that resembles yours. It was conceded as an abstract possibility like centaurs existing.
Kandinsky Without that concession you'd have done your usual trick of claiming victory for your crazy ideas and leaving the thread with those famous words..."My work here is done."
Kandinsky: 'Wack-job' is far too basic a term. You've spent years believing in Atlantis, cyclical cataclysms, 'forbidden knowledge', lost civilizations and God only knows what else.
Kandinksy: If you had contained yourself to those ideas we wouldn't be having this discussion. I used to have the same ideas.
Kandinsky: Instead, you embark on an egotistical adventure of accusing academics of dishonesty and of scientists conspiring to hide the 'Truth' from the rest of us.
Kandinsky: Then you set yourself up as arbiter of the theory of evolution and find it wanting Ignoring decades of research and our old friend the university library, you seriously believe that you alone have discovered a PCPE...
Kandinsky: You are not a wack-job, just a person with blinkered dedication to a belief system that years of being contradicted will not alter...
SC: I'd like to see a proof of this. What library do you suggest? DNA is a code, a 'programme' if you like. For all you know that 'programme' could respond to the environment proactively as well as reactively. Do you actually know what every single part of the DNA code does? If so, do you have a reference? Thanks.
Kandinsky: What a surprise...the "Prove it!" defense. Geez, Scott,
Kandinsky: are we off on another 'possibilities' adventure? If you believe that there is a 'possibility' that DNA is an intelligent program designed to spread homo sapiens into space..
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”
“The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.”
Kandinsky: To avoid accepting reasoned understandings of life's history and genetics on this planet you've invented PCPE.
KandinskY: To explain why the reasoned understandings are wrong you've created the VSM Defense.
Kandinsky: With the PCPE notion being shown to be implausible,
Kandinsky: you've now created a message in DNA. Jeez, Scott! Does any of this embarrass you!?
Kandinsky: I've said it before...if all our theories, research and knowledge have to be dismissed to support a conclusion...
Kandinsky: Colleges do good night courses and they're reasonably priced. I strongly advise you to take a GCSE in science. You'll learn a few things and gain access to the library. Teachers enjoy characters with unfounded beliefs in their classes. It makes for great fun
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by DangerDeath
You can even get pig organs, because they are compatible, so much for this proof..
How did they find out? Where do they come from? Why is the operation safe? Why are your anti-science points so reliant on science?
SC: What I have are questions; questions that are apparently causing you some measure of annoyance it would seem.
And before you go all huffy – I am categorically not against science, okay! Let’s get that perfectly straight. It’s the SCIENTISTS that mess with evidence I have the problem with. Are we clear on that?
SC: You use such terms in the same way the Inquisition used the term “Witchcraft”, as if they are something to be feared. Why do you fear such terms, Kandinsky? What is it that so concerns you about them?
You well know I accept evolution. Decades of research has NEVER considered evolution through the lens of parallel evolution – a concept that might actually (as I keep saying) help explain some of the shortcomings of the ‘singular’ evolutionary model. You use such terms as “decades of research” as though the length of study somehow validates the conclusion; that the conclusion must be correct cos we studied the subject for years. Science is a graveyard of such research and conclusions.
SC: I said it as speculation – indeed, it was asked as a question. Nothing wrong with that, is there? What have you against thinking about possibilities, about the intuitive mind?
SC: Not so. I understand life’s history and genetics well enough to understand its shortcomings. It is these I have tried to find a solution to since the prevailing model of our history and origins cannot yet answer such.
SC: Why do you feel so compelled to defeat this idea, Kandinsky? Why do you feel so driven to have this idea dismissed with every device you can muster, including (though not limited to) derision, ad hominems, ridicule, sarcasm. The argument stands. You have debunked nothing.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by amari
Most will say humanoids migrated from Europe and Asia to the Americas and can be traced by DNA. I say the opposite that the humanoids came from the Americas and spread throughout the Earth
Amari...the idea doesn't really work or explain why fossils get progressively older as we get closer to Africa.
Kandinsky: Debunked? PCPE has been thoroughly debunked.
Kandinsky: Your take on advanced civilizations has been debunked.
Kandinsky: Until you can support your ephemeral ideas with evidence, the book deal and 'told you so' daydreams will never come true.
Okay, Kandinsky - show me how evolution - as it is presently understood today - cannot allow for the following scenario:
You use the phrase "Advanced Civilisation" like it's some kind of disease. The people that lived during the Dark Ages would have spoken of the ancient "Advanced Civilisation" that existed in a former "Golden Age" i.e. the Roman Empire.
Kandinsk: Still spamming the boards with your own links I see.
SC: Okay, Kandinsky - show me how evolution - as it is presently understood today - cannot allow for the following scenario:
Kandinksy: You've been shown in terms that were fairly simple and clearly expressed. That you confound them into something utterly different is inevitable.
Kandinksy: You're now using grass as a means of claiming intelligent bipedal humanoids existed in the Americas? Ridiculous.
SC: Okay, Kandinsky, let's cut to the chase here - show me how the science of evolution - as it is presently understood today - cannot allow for the following scenario:
Two (or more) proto-bacteria in different parts of the world, in different environments, eventually evolve two (or more) lineages producing different types of grass. The difference in the grass types being the result of their local environment. Explain to me with all the evolutionary knowledge and research that I apparently don't understand or am dismissing, how this is not viable within the corpus of current evolutionary understanding? That's all you have to do and I will drop the idea - can't say fairer than that now, can I?
Show this board where and how my work has been disproven on any other board. Let's see it, Kandinsky.
And - for the record - I have never stated anywhere in this thread that an identicalhominid species would have evolved in another part of the world, only that it is feasible that another hominid species with high intelligence could have evolved elsewhere in parallel.
THE QUESTION:
How very, very different you must find things here on GHMB, where the promoters of alternative ideas and explorers of new theories can not be simply bullied off the forum by a crowd of clucking, tutting, sneering cynics in residence.
The Hall of Ma’at, that tomb of dead ideas and intellectual cowardice, where the closing of ranks replaces debate and where any argument which challenges the smug preconceptions of the regulars is stamped upon. Where posts are edited, censored, or removed at the merest whiff of any dissent or alternative argument that might hold water, and where the slightest inkling of a fresh and thought-provoking take on the ancient world is enough to bring the moderators in like fussing mother hens to close down the thread.
Yes, how very different you must find GHMB, when you regularly hone your skills on a forum where anyone with an alternative view has to proceed with two hands tied behind their backs while a gang of co-dependent reactionaries lay into them with full editorial backing and who then have the gall to pretend that they are actually freely debating anything or “weighing the evidence”. Why, it was daily entertainment at one point to tune in to that site just to hear the regular thud-thud-thud of Scott Creighton’s threads being shut down by the panicking moderators as quickly as he could start them. At one point they split the entire Ancient History section in two to try to quarantine Scott’s contributions.
Such was the fear of new ideas. Such was the loathing for an independent mind. Such was the intolerance of anyone who dared to try to waken those leaden, sleeping, pedestrian brains, some of whom had once dabbled in alternative theory themselves and had their fingers burnt and so took up their new closed mindsets with all the venom of the convert. Yet when Robert Bauval visits the forum they all roll over to have their bellies tickled by the great man – his fame and book sales overcoming their die hard allegiance to the orthodox view. A most unedifying sight, a most unhealthy environment, and indeed it would all be weirdly funny were there not so many decent and open minded people interested in the alternate history field who wander innocently in to the midst of this self-serving cabal only to get the intellectual equivalent of a mugging.
SC: Okay, Kandinsky, let's cut to the chase here - show me how the science of evolution - as it is presently understood today - cannot allow for the following scenario:
Two (or more) proto-bacteria in different parts of the world, in different environments, eventually evolve two (or more) lineages producing different types of grass. The difference in the grass types being the result of their local environment. Explain to me with all the evolutionary knowledge and research that I apparently don't understand or am dismissing, how this is not viable within the corpus of current evolutionary understanding? That's all you have to do and I will drop the idea - can't say fairer than that now, can I?
Originally posted by NephraTari
Why do people always wonder how people go to the america's?
You accept that people developed in asia, africa and europe but not here?
Native Americans cannot truly be native?
I got news for all of you. We didn't come here from anywhere. We developed here just as people's of other cultures developed on their own patch of earth.
We have always been here. Hopi legends tell of how we survived many global catastrophe's with help from our brothers and sisters from the stars.
We survived, Fire, Ice, and flood. We will continue to survive as we always have. We are not asians.. we are not africans.. we are americans.
Our people have always been here.
Why can people not accept that?
Originally posted by NephraTari Our people have always been here. Why can people not accept that?
Originally posted by Scott Creighton
Within environments of extreme cold and extreme heat, life forms that evolve will be severely limited. In more temperate (i.e. life-conducive) climes, however, then all manner of life can evolve - including (for example) one proto-bacteria laying the lineage for non-flowering plants whilst another proto-bacteria elsewhere in a temperate region of the world laying the lineage for flowering plants.
In my view it is entirely feasible then that in such "tempearte zones", similar life forms could have evolved all over the planet (within the temperate zone), some of which could ultimately have produced consciously aware species.
As such I consider it entirely feasible still that consciously aware species (different from but not entirely unlike humans) could have evolved (in parallel) in such circumstances.
As an aside - and this really is my own personal opinion about evolution - so take from it what you will, or not, as the case may be. I see evolution not as a long series of "fortunate accidents" of mutation but rather as organisms proactively responding to environmental changes triggered perhaps by chemical reactions encoded within the orgamism's DNA.
This is to say that there may be a programme within the DNA of an organism that triggers an "appropriate" response (change) in the organism when it encounters a different or changing environment.