North Korea 'fires more missiles', page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 12:06 AM by sy.gunson
reply to post by Avarus


Can't agree with that.

NK is a weapons proliferator and if you are not aware of the fact then you need to read more widely.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 03:12 AM by Harlequin
reply to post by sy.gunson


my thats interesting given that

source
using data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute

and rather much contadicts that statement about North Korea


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 04:45 AM by jonny2410
reply to post by smashenator


I really don't think the US can afford or fund a war in NK. Furthermore there is no way the US, with all its troops already stretched in Middle East could fight a country with a 1M strong army.

If there is going to be a war or invasion by NK which looks inevitable now unfortuenly the US and Nato will find it very hard to fight NK.

[edit on 27-5-2009 by jonny2410]


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 11:44 AM by JKersteJr
reply to post by smashenator


History of Nuclear Testing
The U.S. has carried out 1,030 nuclear weapons tests (the last and final test on 23 September 1993). The Soviet Union: 715 tests (the last on 25 October 1990 -- Russia has not exploded any nuclear weapons). France: 210 tests (the last and final test on 27 January 1996). Britain: 45 tests (the last and final on 26 November 1991). China: 43 tests (with some four more tests reportedly planned for 1996-1997).


Has everyone forgotten that the US leads the world in Nuclear tests and that we are the only country that has used an Atomic bomb?

That link doesn't include the many nuclear tests conducted in Antarctica(which coincidentally is centered directly under the giant ozone layer hole) by the US, Russia, Britain, as well as others. Not saying NK isn't a threat, but lets not jump the gun.

[edit on 5/27/2009 by JKersteJr]


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 11:45 AM by grimreaper797
reply to post by jonny2410


We have plenty of bombs and munitions ready to go. If war were to break out between the US and NK, the US wouldn't bother with ground troops until the country was practically a wasteland.

In my opinion, I would use intelligence to bomb the leadership of North Korea to oblivion, then have South Korea take over the country politically. It would be Korea, no north or south.

Cut the leadership, military and politically in North Korea, and the country cannot wage a successful war, or much of any war. They will fall into confusion as to what to do without proper leadership.

First chance we have, we should be considering massive bombing of SK, then helping SK take control of the country politically.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 03:35 PM by truttseeker
reply to post by JKersteJr


Have you forgotten that the US is the leader in trying to disarm the world of nuclear weapons? Anyway, this is really disturbing. I dont think you will really see the US invade, but if NK shoots a missile at one of our ships or SK's ships then guess what, its on. I dont think the US is going to invade the US with an army. We'll bomb the everloving crap out of them, and say screw rebuilding. JMO


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 04:56 PM by JKersteJr
Originally posted by truttseeker
reply to post by JKersteJr


Have you forgotten that the US is the leader in trying to disarm the world of nuclear weapons?


Nope, but why is that, who annointed the US as the world police?

Are we not continually developing weapons while disarming everyone else?

[edit on 5/27/2009 by JKersteJr]


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 07:33 PM by truttseeker
reply to post by JKersteJr


Because were the most powerful country in the world. If something happens the were supposed go and stop whoevers doing it. Then if we dont then were not upholding our "responsiblity". And were NOT making new weapons of mass destruction, so go ahead and keep trying to justify youre hating the US, because thats whats cool in the world today right?



reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 09:52 PM by stumpyjm
reply to post by grantbeed


who is going to take them out.Our country has become a wimp we do not want to hurt anyones feelings.We have to be politically correct.I use to think that the NWO was a joke,but I see how it is getting to be real.That way we have someone to do the dirty work cause we are to week and frail.I say nuke them all!If you kill the women and kids no future bad guys.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 10:09 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by princeofpeace


posted on 26-5-2009 @ 12:28 AM
That's when this thread started.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 10:43 PM by JKersteJr
reply to post by truttseeker


I thought that was the U.N.'s job, not the self appointed responsibility of the US Government? Do all the participating nations bestow upon the US the acting role as judge, jury and executioner for the world?

I'm not anti government or anti US at all...really, I'm anti Military Industrial Complex and oppose the wealthy, powerful, agenda driven men that clearly pull strings in the White House.

You shouldn't assume that because of my opinion I hate the country I was born, raised, and intend to die in, I value it enough to question the policies carried out globally that have given us a bad reputation.

I guess the real questions would be, do you believe our leaders calling the shots are above corruption and can be they be trusted with the responsibility to maintain civility throughout the world in an un-biased manner? What about other nations that want this power?
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^