Originally posted by Orion7911
So I don't see what your column argument proves or disproves about NRPT.
It doesn't matter how many letters you put together, something very large and very heavy hit those towers, period.
Originally posted by Orion7911
typical tactic of a disinfo artist to make such an outright absurd and unproveable claim
Everything I say is backed up with proof. You can't debunk 43 angles of the second plane hitting. These angles are from mainstream media, independent
journalists and
home videos:
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Orion7911
who are contradicted by other people on the streets who didn't see what you're insinuating they all did.
Every single person who said they didn't see the plane was not in a position to see it. All you've done is take their quotes out of context to
support the no-plane disinfo, which is a disnfo artist tactic.
Originally posted by Orion7911
the symmetry alone supports the argument against your assertion. but if anything hit the wtc, it was a missle in conjuction with pre-placed
charges.
Until you find a missile that is large enough and heavy enough to make that hole, and find a way to hide the explosives in the offices or outside for
everyone to see, then you are the only one making an assertion.
Originally posted by Orion7911
and the true NRPT far better explains the damage than your deteriorating RPT.
Until you explain the above, your "true NRPT" only explains that you make false assertions with zero proof to back them up.
And "deteriorating" RPT?
I'm sorry, but getting yourselves and your theories banned from everywhere only shows that NPT is the only thing
deteriorating.
Originally posted by Orion7911
but unfortunately for you, there's plenty of facts and tons of evidence proving otherwise.
And that's all you can say without providing any of those facts and evidence that so many of us have been asking you to show us for so long now.
Originally posted by Orion7911
actually the above video shows 43 angles and examples of various fakery and deception perpetrated on 9/11.
The disinfo runs freely from this one! It is disinformation to say 43 videos from mainstream media, independent journalists and private citizens are
all fake without the slightest bit of proof.
Originally posted by Orion7911
whose videos all contain evidence and proof of tampering and/or fakery.
And yet you haven't obtained an original video from any of the 43 witnesses to have them analyzed and checked for fakery, thus more disinfo coming
from your keyboard. You're on a roll here!
Originally posted by Orion7911
but there major ones in these as well that show tons of evidence of fakery.
Tons of evidence? So much so that nobody can see it!
You slay me!
Originally posted by Orion7911
its not someones opinion when you have a bridge walking around a static shot of the wtc.
Bridges don't walk. If you think they do, then you should probably go talk to somebody about that.
Originally posted by Orion7911
which was not possible ASL to maintain whatsoever.
Exactly. Can't be
maintained. You're twisting the truth, which is of course, disinformation. The planes didn't fly level at sea level, but
came down from a higher altitude seconds before impact. Which means you're correct, not possible.......but likely!
Originally posted by Orion7911
when planers supporters post videos that profess them as PROOF when its not, is disinfo.
You know, you do this over and over again. All you do is copy what has been said by someone, change a couple words, and then repost it. Not only does
it not show any of the "tons" of NPT proof or evidence, it also shows your maturity and intelligence level.
Originally posted by Orion7911
when planers peddle what you have about the nose in/nose out argument being debunked, its disinfo.
Ooops, there it is again. My post copied, changed a couple words, reposted. You can't debunk or refute anything I've said, so you resort to childish
tactics of copying what I say. Typical of the NPT cult.
Originally posted by Orion7911
the facts and evidence prove otherwise.
You keep saying like a broken record, yet not actually showing us any facts or evidence. What's likely is there is none, that's why you don't post
it.
Originally posted by Orion7911
all one has to do is examine the analysis done in any of these docs and various others that exist, and most will see
Most will not see. Most have ran the hell away from NPT, the other way! And most have banned NPT from their forums. Most want to have nothing to do
with your NPT. So what you just did is made yet another false claim.
Originally posted by Orion7911
Simple... the missle/drone. So you were saying?
Yep, find us a missile/drone that is as large as a jetliner, weighs as much as a jetliner, and travels as slow as a jetliner, then get back to us. You
were saying?
Originally posted by Orion7911
as if you're a pilot, qualified or an authority to judge him.
I am a pilot, and anyone has the right to judge anyone else. It is still somewhat of a free country.
Originally posted by Orion7911
which I have yet to see any line by line debunking showing where what he said was false, innaccurate or nonsensical
And even if there were a line-by-line debunking, you would call it opinion, conjecture, false, disinformation, blah blah blah. It wouldn't really
matter to you one way or another.
By the way, I know you are either D.Duck, Simon Shack/socialservice, or Killtown. See, everybody has their own writing style and I recognize yours.
Since they all have been banned from here, once I find out who you are, bye bye!
