It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Daniem
So says the members of the religion of atheism. The most peaceful response is to live and let live. But that would remove the ego boost of feeling superior, wouldn't it?
[edit on 24-5-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]
Originally posted by Roark
My thoughts on the video:
1. The Kirk Cameron / 3 Little Pigs analogy is weeeaaaak. Telling someone that the 3 little pigs story is true and then deriding them for believing it is NOT the same thing as mocking humankind’s long and complex metaphysical journey throughout history of producing hypotheses and ideas about the origins of the natural world.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
I mostly agree but allow me to say this if you please. Religion is not synomous with "belief in a god".
4: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith
1 a: allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty b (1): fidelity to one's promises (2): sincerity of intentions
2 a (1): belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2): belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion b (1): firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2): complete trust
3: something that is believed especially with strong conviction ; especially : a system of religious beliefs
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by king9072
Ah, big headed idiots you say? So all of Christianity is to put it in your words "big headed idiots"? I feel inclined to point out the obvious fallacy in blanket generalizations about large groups of people. And while we are on subject, why would mocking such be pleasurable? Could it be because you feel superior to them? The mocking in and of itself shows that at the very least. Without a feeling of superiority one would not mock. Thus my statement stands.
[edit on 25-5-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]
Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a logical fallacy where adverse information about a target is pre-emptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say. Poisoning the well is a special case of argumentum ad hominem, and the term was first used with this sense by John Henry Newman in his work Apologia Pro Vita Sua.