Hello Hans,
SC: Whilst orthodox folks might cry, "Foul!", there seems little doubt that the pyramids at Giza were designed using Orion's belt and show us precessional knowledge - knowledge that orthodoxy will not attribute to the AE.
Hans: Please list the math and astronomy experts who agree with your idea Scott?
SC: You are being completely absurd, Hans. The math and astronomy demonstrated in the presentations is self-evident for anyone to see. You don't need a math expert to know how to place a straight line through two points, or a 90* line or a 45* line, do you? This is the true beauty of this proof - it's geometry is so elegantly simple. No math professors required.
If, however, you are suggesting that the math/astronomy demonstrated in the presentations is somehow flawed, then please demonstrate such.
Hans: Just for fun explain why the pyramids cannot be dated back even farther using your precession claim - why do you pick only that one possible alignment for a more current date instead of a much more ancient one?
SC: You raise a very interesting issue here. Since precession is a cycle of 25,920 years duration (or thereabouts) this means that the (Gizamid) alignment of c.10,500BCE with the Orion Belt stars would have presented itself also in the year 36,460BCE. Intriguingly this places a potential Giza-Orion alignment right at the time when the AE Building Texts/Turin Papyrus tells us the AE civilisation began i.e. c.36,000BCE. If this remote epoch marked the foundation time of the AE (prehistoric) civilisation then I would think this would have been much too soon for them to have understood precession/astronomy. It seems, however, that by the time of the next minimum culmination of the belt stars (i.e. c.10,500BCE) the forebears of the AE had indeed acquired sufficient knowledge of precession.
Also, I think the cataclysmic events at the end of the last Ice Age c.10,500BCE perhaps represented a significant and motivating event - the destructive flooding of their ancestral homeland as testified in the Edfu Building Texts - an event that Plato (via Solon) may have 'plagiarised' as the basis for his Atlantis philosophical allegory. It is interesting that Plato offers a date of around c.9,500BCE for this destructive event which is very close to the date within the Giza Precession Wheel (astronomical clock) of c.9,834BCE.
Interesting point - thanks for raising it.
Regards,
Scott Creighton
[edit on 3/6/2009 by Scott Creighton]
[edit on 4/6/2009 by Scott Creighton]



OMG I once thought of that too, for I saw the
remnants of an exploded star in a strange vision, the classical hour glass shape, something I had never seen before as far as I could remember, after
I had been reading this old book on holy geometry and the pyramids. 