It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Sixty-five million years ago, a six-mile-wide asteroid slammed into what's now the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico. The impact, 2 million times more powerful than the largest nuclear bomb ever detonated, gouged out a 112-mile-wide crater and sent mega-tsunamis thousands of feet high in all directions.
Plumes of superheated, incandescent dust broiled the earth's surface, igniting forest fires around the globe. Lingering, the dust probably blocked the sun for years – maybe decades – hindering photosynthesis and causing the food chain to collapse. Sixty-five percent of all living things disappeared.
For about 30 years, that's been the story of how the dinosaurs' 160-million-year reign came to an end. Now, two new controversial studies attempt to revise parts of this narrative.
The first, which appeared in the April 27 issue of Journal of the Geological Society, claims that, in fact, mass extinctions didn't occur until perhaps 300,000 years after the asteroid impact.
Related
The evidence: Marine sediments from around Mexico seem to show that 52 species present before the asteroid strike, a layer identified by blobs or spherules of melted glass, remained for quite some time after.
Scientist: We Overestimate the Asteroid's Effect on the Environment
Princeton University's Gerta Keller, a paleontologist who was lead author on the study, doesn't dispute that the asteroid hit and that it hurt. "I'm sure the day after, they had a headache," she says. But "we vastly overestimate the damage to the environment and to life that this Chicxulub impact had."
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
no...no..NO.. Its real easy folks. Can you say flood ? sorry for the scarcasim but just get tired of hearing all the bogus theories. They are all found ( except for a few oddities like anything) in sedimentary deposits which are formed by our friend H2O.
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
no...no..NO.. Its real easy folks. Can you say flood ? sorry for the scarcasim but just get tired of hearing all the bogus theories. They are all found ( except for a few oddities like anything) in sedimentary deposits which are formed by our friend H2O.
The Asteroid thing does not work for the simple fact that the blast area they say it made would have burned any thing in it to ash. Yet there are fossils where ever they keep saying this"Frank the happy Asteroid" hit.