It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The cores proved that the stones
are composed of in situ natural beachrock that
has been submerged by a combination of rising
Holocene sea level and erosion of underlying sand
presented bulk 14C age data from the cores. The dates ranging from 3510 to 2745 years BP indicate the stones are much too young to be part of the mythological
city/state of Atlantis,
including a sizeable group with a website and a journal called Atlantis Rising have challenged all science-based investigations. A psychologist (see Little (2006), recently joined the ranks of alternative believers. He claims in his website that the
author (Shinn) is part of a government conspiracy to prevent people from learning the true origin of the stones.
Originally posted by The Mack
I do not remember the guys name but it was someone from that Michael Cremo crowd. He went out there and checked it out and HE said it was just rocks. He said the same thing about the underwater "pyramid" in japan. Like my archeologist buddy said, if anyone would say that this was anything odd it would be him.
[edit on 27-5-2009 by The Mack]