Governor plans to completely eliminate welfare for families , page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 56 times


reply posted on 23-5-2009 @ 10:37 PM by TheAssociate


There's two cents, take it for what it's worth. and here is some additional change because i'm not sure for how many lines a Youtube video counts toward the minimum.


reply posted on 23-5-2009 @ 11:16 PM by Jessicamsa
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Originally posted by Jessicamsa
Many on welfare are single mothers. Single mothers are often barred by the courts from moving so many miles from the non-custodial parent, whether he actually participates in the kid(s)'s lives or not or whether he pays child support or not. The government is forcing many of these mothers to live in an area where they cannot find jobs to support themselves, imprisoning them within their environments.

I know because I lived like that for three years. It's one of the ultimate oppressions you can do to a family.

I've never ever heard of this at all. My hubby pays for two other kids by a welfare leech of a woman. She moved away to Florida, thankfully she moved back before we moved here,,,ugh and had everything transferred down here. And HE Was involved with their lives. I don't know what state you live in, but that was NJ. And now that his children are adults, she had another baby to keep leaching off of NJ. Even though she is able bodied if not a little slow, but she can do minial jobs.


It happens a lot more often than that. I was shoplifting and such before I finally went onto welfare, because I thought welfare was so beneath me. In the area where I was trapped, the businesses would not hire me. It was a small community, and people knew my husband. He worked for the government too, so he knew the ins and outs of the system. All I knew was the little bit I was taught in public school, which turned out to be lies. I was always a hard worker. I even had a 100 average in algebra my entire freshman year of high school. It didn't matter as far as jobs were concerned. Finally, I got to the point where I figured since the government was forcing me to stay in an area with no jobs, the government could pay to take care of me. Then I went on welfare. I had previously even found a job out of the area and the courts refused to let me live outside where my husband lived and made me give up the job. In order for me to move, I'd have to give up my baby to my husband. My husband is a very violent man who was even going to set fire to me at one point. I was terrified that he was going to kill me and my daughter.

A lot of the women who are forced into these situations by the courts have abusive former partners. The abusers want to maintain control over their victims by any means possible, and often that includes using the court and legal system against them.


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 12:06 AM by bad2bone
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler


dont worrie about the Mexicans here in calif at one time they use to drive # cars now you see all of them drivieng new bmw and suv top dollar cars and they own more than half of the bussiness were i live were once use to be all white in calif look around and see who is working amd who is not its the mexicans they are it really makes me mad were this country is going and were my state is going but history told us this would happen we are to stupid to learn from are past


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 01:59 AM by Melissa101
Originally posted by 31337
All I have to say is good for California!!!! I'm applauding their decision and hope all US states and the Federal Govt do the same thing. Its a drain on our tax dollars and keeps taxes higher then they should be. I don't think any riots will come of this. However when people start to leave California and come to states that still give out checks for doing nothing all day please don't come to the DC Metro area. There are way too many people in this area already and really most won't say it, but we really don't want/need you here. May I suggest the Midwest where they need population. I might also suggest if they are not from the USA and from south of the border (not the one in South Carolina) but Mexico and farther South to head back to where you came from. We have enough to do all the needed work here already and don't want any more gang members to come out East.


Wow a little harsh don't you think. I am speechless. Yes the imigrants are draining our resources but American;s who had jobs and worked all their lives do not like getiing a check for doing nothing all day. Trust me we want to work and personlay I still work hard putting out a garden and such to find some means to keep busy, productive and feed the family. Many people do abuse the system but come on slapping the lazy stigma on everyone is just wrong. If we cannot find work then what are we supposed to do? If My husband and I have worked very hard over the last twenty years and never dreamed of being laid off and unable to find work. THis is not fun. If you are fortunate enough to have a job then lucky you but what are you going to do when you loose yours? Will you not sign up for what you have to. I have never in my life need assistance but I cannot let my family go without could you? Maybe you do not have a family I do not know but look outside the box things are changing and not everyone likes it or wants it.


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 02:46 AM by AllinTheMind89
You know, I have NEVER seen a person or "family" that deserves welfare support. I live in a certain part of Virginia and here are my examples:

1. A woman who has two children from two different fathers, lives with her parents. She still collects welfare checks and spends it on new clothes and she also bought a new van. She does not work, and solely lives off of her parents and the welfare money. My mom works at a elementary school and this lady's children attend there, so she knows their situation.

2. When I graduated high school last year, one person graduated from the grade below early. His family DID NOT work, and they received welfare checks. He and his family lived in a inherited house that has been in their family for years. His father did not work, and neither did his mother. They live off of welfare. He got free lunch all the time and was a part of that "no child left behind" bullsh**.

What is the point? I understand that 3 out of 4 homeless people are veterans, and we should help them! But people don't even want to work. They just want to be lazy, and solely depend on the government for their needs. In my town, there is a building located in the downtown area that allows homeless people to stay there overnight. They get fed dinner at night, sleep, then get breakfast in the morning but have to leave during the day to find jobs. It is RARELY used because the homeless in the area are too damn lazy to go out and try and get jobs. This place even has assigned job programs (because I know not every employer wants to higher homeless people).

It makes me so mad because the people that REALLY suffer in this country are the middle class. The poor are fine because they get to live off of welfare, and the rich are fine because they've got money. But, the middle class suffers because they're constantly in debt and cannot even get a little help. I think Gov. Arnold's plan will hopefully make some of these people actually get up and work.

edit: I am in no way a socialist or a fan of socialism. I have just never seen anything good come from welfare. My opinion doesn't include Unemployment because people actually need that.

[edit on 24-5-2009 by AllinTheMind89]


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 05:08 AM by space cadet
In a combination public assistance office/ child support recovery location here, my husband and I spent many mornings there as we tried to establish that he was not the same person named the father on a particular child support case ( my husband has a very very common name and the state mistakenly charged his IRS account with a huge child support bill, the child was not his, he did not know the mother, it was a case of mistaken identity) we would notice a pattern. A car pulls up, woman and man together and usually 2 or more small children. The woman goes in, takes the kids, deals with appointments, sign ups, ect, and the men never go in. The cars that they typically come in are fairly new, nice cars. Their clothing and shoes look nice. I asked one woman once if she would be offended if I asked her about her car, she was driving a mercedez benz, and she proudly exclaimed that she didn't have but 22 dollars a month rent to pay for her 4 bedroom apt, the only utility she paid was electric, water and heat are provided by the state, she has no medical bills, her and her children are on medicaid, and her food is paid for by the state, she exclaimed that she recieved nearly 500 a month in food stamps, and she gets a check for her kids each month. She said she was able to buy the car with that, because she essentially had no bills or anything else to spend it on ( what about college?), and yes, her supposedly 'absent' baby daddy was the guy who is driving her around in her mercedez. I think most likely all the other men waiting in the parking lot are most likely other 'absent parents'.


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 09:25 AM by mblahnikluver
reply to post by AllinTheMind89



You are stereotyping and how do you really know a persons situation?? You dont plain and simple. I grew up with the help of the welfare system. My mom was a single parent with three kids and NO help from my dad whatsoever or anyone else really. My mother worked 2 jobs AND put herself through school. If it wasnt for the assistance my mom received we would have been homeless and starving. My mom did her best but sometimes a little assistance is good and it helped her and us. When she no longer needed it she got off of it. There was no abusing the system in any way. I firmly believe some people do deserve some assistance and that too many others do abuse it. You really have no idea until you are in a situation where it would help YOU.


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 09:55 AM by poet1b
reply to post by DangerDeath



In reality, the authorities hoard and establish monopoly on all things that are realistically needed for people to live decently, and there is a big surplus of those things. Just think of how big modern times' productivity is, and how much food is being destroyed every year just to maintain prices (in order to maintain the illusion that one must work 40 + hours a week). Yes, that's the game, the "idea" I'm talking about. This is the same idea now as it was 100 years ago, like nothing changed in the ways of productivity. No way! this idea has been made a constant while it really is a variable.


Excellent post, you nailed it on the head. This isn't an economic downturn created by a lack of goods and services, it is an economic downturn created by corruption in our banking and investment institutions designed specifically to squeeze the middle class.

While we are more productive than ever, with both the men and women working and producing more than ever, as a society we are slipping into debt when we should be growing in wealth.

Wake up sheoples.


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 10:09 AM by poet1b
reply to post by space cadet



I have known people on welfare, and none live the life that you describe, or anything close to it. I see people cashing welfare checks, and they don't drive nice cars, and they aren't dressed nicely.

However, there are plenty of women collecting child support checks living with men who make decent money, and subsidize their lives cheating some guy out of his paycheck because she claimed he was the father. Chances are, that is what you have been seeing. There is a huge scam going on, where a woman claims that a man is the father to her child, and unless the guy shows up at court with proof that he is not the father, the courts will seize a large chunk of his paycheck to support a child that may not be his own, or that he may never have known to exist, which the possible father will never be allowed to see or raise.

If the state of CA needs to save some money, they can start to lay off a large number of the bureaucrats who create messes like family services whose only jobs are to steal from honest hard working people.

They could also legalize cannabis, create a new industries by doing so, collect large amounts of tax money, while saving the state huge amounts of money wasted in going after harmless potheads.

Eliminate the war on drugs and thereby eliminate the money that brings in the criminal element creates far more crime than it prevents, tax drug use, and save billions fighting the crime that would be eliminated.

In other words, time to end the police state.
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^