Conservative radio hosts gets waterboarded, and lasts six seconds before saying its torture, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 06:52 PM by bsbray11
reply to post by WisdomInChains



I think he would have said anything eventually.



reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 06:58 PM by dragonridr
I don't get it if it wasn't torture they wouldn't use it.The difference is it creates terror which can be used to gain information. It is mental torture without the physical effects. They aren't using battery cables cutting off fingers burning out an eye with a hot poker. Physical torture goes into creating fear and physical injury. Mental torture plays off fear of drowning freezing to death anything they can do to break there will. There will tells them not to cooperate you have to convince them this is not in there best interest to do so. If water boarding didn't create terror what would be the point really? Are we supposed to ask real nice for the terrorist to give us information?


So, is this what's one of these "interviews" are supposed to sound like?

"Mr. Khalid Sheik Mohammed, thank you for joining us this morning. Some coffee or maybe a Coke before we begin? Oh, and I'm sorry. Yeah...you'll have to remove the headphones from your iPod. Yeah, it's a rule. I agree, and on behalf of the entire United States government and the President himself, let me apologize that someone didn't explain that in advance.

Oh, I agree...that Lady Gaga really has it going on. Nonetheless, please, you'll have to take off the headphones. But remember, you're signed up for our "Spa Sensation" right after luncheon. Hey - what would a massage be without a little music? You can listen then. OK? Good.

Now Mohammed. Can I call you Mohammed? About this whole September 11 situation, Mohammed. Would you mind telling me who planned the unfortunate event?... Oh, don't be silly. It's fine if you say you don't know. All we want is what you know to be the truth. We'd hate to have you feel that you must lie or unjustly point the finger at any of your friends. Hey, it ain't right for a guy to rat out his friends -- am I right? C'mon, Sheiky...am I right?

...So, really, you don't know anything? Nothing?...Hmmm.What about -- oh. Not that, either, huh? Or maybe you could tell me about the guy who -- really? Yikes. Screwed that one up, too. We thought you knew him.

Yes, that's right! "Our bad!" Ha, ha! Good one! ...Yes! "L-O-L!!!" You've got quite a sense of humor!

Hey, I've enjoyed this. And we hope our time together hasn't been an imposition in your day. And we certainly do appreciate that you pulled yourself away from your prep work for your appearance on Oprah. Well, look. Why don't we meet up tomorrow and talk a bit more then. Maybe, just maybe, you might remember something about September 11 and we can spend a few minutes talking about it.

What's a good time for you? Oh, heck yes. Check your activity schedule and get back to me. ...OK. Your "people" will get back to me. Whatever works for you."

Sure. I'd be glad to validate your parking...What do you think we are? Infidels?"


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:01 PM by habu71
reply to post by grover



I served my country and am intimately familiar with what the
Geneva Conventions say.......If I flew my aircraft over hostile territory, in a civilian "uniform", and were shot down, I would not be treated as a Prisoner of War unless I had a military id or uniform. Therefore, according the the Geneva Convention, I would not be entitled to it's protections (like Gary Powers).

The Geneva Convention applies to prisoners of war, i.e. military soldiers recognized as such. As one poster said, waterboarding does not even remotely approach what the Egyptians or Saudis, or the Iranians doe to their prisoners. I went through SERE, survived, and was told that it was minor compared to what we might experience.

Members of the military of other countries do not normally and willingly take civilian casualties. Did the hijackers of 9/11 willingly take civilain casualties? YES, over 3000 of them......


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:02 PM by sos37
Originally posted by grover
reply to
post by sos37


We are a nation of laws that is what is supposed to make us different from the rest of the world... we willingly signed the Geneva conventions and we have not withdrawn from them... therefore like it or not they are the law of the land... and they define water boarding as torture... hence we broke the law.

BTW I willingly served my country... did you or are you just another arm chair blow hard?


[edit on 22-5-2009 by grover]


How can someone who has actually served their country in a military capacity, possibly even seen the enemy face to face, have such a cavalier attitude about your own countrymen as opposed to foreigners who would see us either converted to Islam or destroyed? I don't know how old you are, but is it because you weren't supported by America upon your return from Vietnam that you have such hate for your fellow Americans?


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:07 PM by sos37
Originally posted by grover
reply to
post by sos37



Did you serve or are you one did you like Cheney have other things to do and is instead another arm chair blow hard warrior?

[edit on 22-5-2009 by grover]


So what your saying is if someone doesn't serve in the American military, they obviously don't love this country? Seriously?

Nice. Real nice.


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:22 PM by David9176
Thanks for the thread!!

And thanks for the video as well!!!

WATERBOARDING IS TORTURE.

If you feel like you are drowning...then you feel like you are DYING.

How can anyone sit here and say that it's not torture.

Do it to yourself if you are such a hardass and believe it's not a big deal.

There is a reason they USE IT YA KNOW.

BECAUSE IT'S TORTURE.

------------------------

tor⋅ture  [tawr-cher] Show IPA noun, verb, -tured, -tur⋅ing.
–noun
1. the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.
2. a method of inflicting such pain.
3. Often, tortures. the pain or suffering caused or undergone.
4. extreme anguish of body or mind; agony.
5. a cause of severe pain or anguish.
–verb (used with object)
6. to subject to torture.
7. to afflict with severe pain of body or mind: My back is torturing me.
8. to force or extort by torture: We'll torture the truth from his lips!
9. to twist, force, or bring into some unnatural position or form: trees tortured by storms.
10. to distort or pervert (language, meaning, etc.).
dictionary.reference.com...

Now get over it!

By the way...I've never cared for Mancow. I used to get his radio show when i lived near chicago...haven't listen to him since i was a teenager. he didn't come off as a Conservative talk show host...but then again...I wasn't listening for the politics as I didn't care for that kind of thing back then.




[edit on 22-5-2009 by David9176]


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:25 PM by David9176
reply to post by CuriousSkeptic





Mancow is a little pussy, watching him freak-out after literally like 6 seconds when the guy was being gentle as hell with was rather hilarious.


You try it tough guy.

I bet you don't last as long as he did.


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:33 PM by David9176
reply to post by rapinbatsisaltherage



Hannity wouldn't last as long as Mancow did. No one can handle that for an extended period of time.

I'm sure old Hannity will hear about this...and will say nothing.

He refuses to think that this country has ever done anything wrong no matter how many facts are thrown in his face.


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:37 PM by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by David9176



He refuses to think that this country has ever done anything wrong no matter how many facts are thrown in his face.


Yep, it's like talking to a wall.

Same thing happens with some of the MSNBC staff when someone tries to suggest something negative about Obama.

You might as well be having conversations with rocks.


reply posted on 22-5-2009 @ 07:40 PM by its bologna
reply to post by sos37



Waterboarding is torture, even conservatives are starting to say it. But the real debate is over whether or not we should.


There was a recent poll that stated 49% of Americans thinks that torture would be "sometimes justified". The survey asked: "Do you think the use of torture against suspected terrorists in order to gain important information can often be justified, sometimes be justified, rarely be justified, or never be justified?" www.cnn.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">source

I can see how supporters of these tactics may think they are beneficial for someone we "think" may have some valuable intelligence. But people who make these arguments haven't read on interrogation tactics. There are many in the intelligence community that dismiss tactics like these, because the information obtained can be false.

And wasn't KSM waterboarded 183 times over a month period? The argument being made by proponents of these tactics is that they thwarted an imminent attack on US soil. It wasn't that imminent if it took 183 times and a month to get it out of him.

Someone previously asked if we risk American lives for our "moral compass". I don't really think American lives would have been any more at risk if we didn't do these things. And besides, these tactics have emboldend more to fight against us.


Edit to include source


[edit on 22-5-2009 by its bologna]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags