It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

First, And Possibly Last, Recording Of My Space Brothers Fly Over In Halifax

page: 8
37
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 23 2009 @ 08:53 AM
link   
It's clearly a light infront of the camera, anyone with knowledge should know that when you move the camera on something that's standing pretty much still you can make it look like it's moving, when he zooms out... :|




posted on May, 23 2009 @ 08:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by SoulOrb

Originally posted by DGFenrir
Isn't there an airport in the direction you were filming?


Yes there was in fact, it was about 30 KM in the distance. Oh my, maybe I saw a plane, do you suppose? I might take me a ride on one of those fan fangled new planes some day.


Yes you could have. The red and green lights aren't always visible. Especially if viewed from behind.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 08:59 AM
link   
SoulOrb, I am a new member so i cannot message people till i get some more posts. Message me your email. I am very interested too see this with my own eyes, I am not calling you a liar. I just need to come look myself before I take this claim seriously. I am in Halifax. I look forward to hearing from you.


-The Juice



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 09:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheJuice902
SoulOrb, I am a new member so i cannot message people till i get some more posts. Message me your email. I am very interested too see this with my own eyes, I am not calling you a liar. I just need to come look myself before I take this claim seriously. I am in Halifax. I look forward to hearing from you.
-The Juice


The Juice, we will meet I suspect. I am glad I inspired you to look into this. I am going to defer to my higher self on this meet, you know what I look like, if I appear in your circle in the next week or so, come up and introduce yourself as "The Juice", and you will know that this is your direction and that your higher self arranged it. If you want, send an intent giving permission to meet me.

This might sound corny. However, one this I have learned this is all about vibration, and I do not have the vibration *yet* to tow people along, so I need to know through confirmation they wish you to be awakened.

I suspect the answer is yes, but this is part of my process, and if it works you know you are on the right path and not just being led. In the meantime watch my "Sending Love" video posted earlier in this thread.

Wow, I am glad there are open minded people like you in my area.


[edit on 23-5-2009 by SoulOrb]



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 09:16 AM
link   
hmmm..interesting... :S



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 09:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by DGFenrir
Yes you could have. The red and green lights aren't always visible. Especially if viewed from behind.


As you wish. Namaste. Thank you for the time you have dedicated to this process of learning and sharing.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 09:22 AM
link   
I can respect that, I totally know what you mean. When similiar things happen to me, they are usually very personal and seldom are other people involved. though sometimes i have had friends witness things with me, not always to do with aliens, sometimes more along the lines of telepathy. either way. its not just me and you that are feeling change coming, alot of people feeling and dream that change is coming, or is honestly already happening, were talking here arent we? ahaah. too many of these nuts on this site are too wrapped up in all these rediculous conspiracys. we simply take the world for what it is. a giant question mark. an interesting place to live.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 09:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Nventual
 


It's nice that you know OP and trust him.
However, all of what you have to say is hearsay and personal opinion.
You can not use your trust in someone as evidence or think that others should take that as evidence.
That a very fractured insight if that is your true belief

It's not being un trusting or lacking faith in humans.
It's simply being assertive and self aware if you don't do this in life you'll end up no where good.
I have very strong faith in humans actually more faith then most do but this has nothing to do with that, this is about if aliens visit earth and if OP really shot a video of a "UFO".

Just to make my point, there were many people who trusted and spoke good of Hitler.I am sure you can see and understand where I am coming from, that you can not let anyone dictate the character of another person to you and it would be foolish to do so.

Also, I am not try to make this personal.

If we took every video and simply thought it was real because a person says the creator wouldn't lie and so on, we'd never get anywhere with the theories of aliens visiting earth.

It is vital that every video and material presented should be critiqued and and all possibilities explored. Once you do this you're material becomes much stronger.Then when a true skeptic comes along and throws out an already traveled theory on what it is in the video you can show them proof otherwise. Once and only when you know everything that it ISN'T is when you can truly begin to see what it is.
So anyone who gets offended at ideas/theories being thrown out about what the object possibly is in the video they are no longer in this fight for the purpose of the truth and knowledge they either were never able to or have stopped being able to separate their personal from the objective at hand.

If I made a true UFO video, I would want it gone over by many people with many ideas and as many of those ideas explored. It would only do good for me and my material if it turned out to be none of those things. I would never take it personal unless that person lacked class, tact, and respect.
If it were found out to be something else, that I didn't intentionally fake I'd take it as a learning experience and be grateful for a new insight and then take what I learned and apply it to future videos.
We all just want the truth, and to know if aliens visit earth, and to get closer to knowing if they do we can not just accept any and every video presented to us we need to let our dreams and passions on the back burner and let logic and common sense come into play, and explore every detail/inch of the video.
To accept any video would be to accept and be blinded by ignorance.
It would(has) hurt the cause and prolong the truth and reality of the subject even longer.
Nothing can rise to the surface if it keeps being buried by sh-t.
It's exactly like looking for gold and diamonds you need to shovel out and shift out all the extra debris and then take a closer look at the things that mimic the real thing.

Anyone who can not understand this may want to take a look inside themselves and try to see what their true agenda and intentions are.
Clearly they are far from wanting to know the truth and facts.

I simply said what I saw.
A laser being shined into the sky with feed back from the laser in certain moments of the video it could have easily been pointed at a closer object that is shrouded in the darkness then straight into the sky to get the different strengths.
The only way I know this, Is because I play with my own laser in the sky quite often and it looks exactly like his video.
There are many other videos out there that look like this, and I'm probably going to make one of my own if I am able bodied tonight.
What struck me as odd is intentional rapid moving of the camera.
some what similiar
www.youtube.com...



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by pop_science
It's nice that you know OP and trust him.


They do not know me. They get a sense of my style and demenor from this and other videos I have posted here.

Look, claiming you see UFO's is not a social upgrade in most communities. Try trusting more and thinking less. All I read in you post so far is logical thought, based.

I will go through your post more later, check out some of my other videos and you will see I am quite forthright, and I have nothing to hide. I am simply sharing, and it is not filtered.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 10:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by SoulOrb
The camera was a Sony DCR-HC21, 20 times optical, 700 Digital. Digital was disabled. Camera was set in black and white mode. I switched between Nightshot and normal modes a few times. The ship would be on there earlier but it did not show up well in Nightmode for some reason, and the minute I switched back to normal the auto focus saw the ship and focused in.

This is a $250 camera, nothing special, and believe me the ship was close, just that these cameras are not terrific, and especially on zoom at night with stabilizer, it is hard to keep still on a point without a tripod. The ships are too fast, however I spotted it about 5km away, and would not show up on camera until about 1 km away.



I sell video cameras for a living... This camera came out in 2004-05, it runs on Mini-DV tape, its extremly low res (480p) then on top of that your compressing the video even more when uploading to youtube.. Also the "Night Vision/Night Shot/Infared mode" only works on infared light that is emitted by a infared led at the front of your camera.. much the same as the infared led on your tv remote. The infared light will only reach around about 5-6m infront of the v/camera, furthermore to make the "Night Vision" work the camera's CCD has to be able to see the infared light on objects. (The CCD is the square shaped sensor behind the lens that records light coming through the lens, which then changes the light into a digital signal bla bla bla..) And there is no optical or digital image stabilisation as well..

So what im getting at here is this v/camera is absolute S@#! House for night work, and a very easy v/camera to create a hoax video..

Me personally if i were to try and capture something for evidence for lights in the sky at night would at least need:

  1. a HD sensor 1080i (prefered 1080p)
  2. use a single CMOS sensor over 3CMOS, CCD or 3CCD (CCD does not work well in low light and does not have the natural colour range like CMOS.. also CCD sensors will show A heap of glare. And if your using 3 sensors instead of 1 your minimising the amount of light by 66% for each sensor..)
  3. Capture the video on a data recording camera (HDD, Memory Card or Flash) as they allow for maximum resolution 1920x1080.. tape HDV cameras only allow for 1440x1080
  4. Use a v/camera with a low F stop.. like F1.8 or even F1.2
  5. Also make sure the camera is capable of a low compression or Hi Mbps setting such as 24Mbps or 28Mbps.. i find only a few brands support this (Canon and Jvc.. Jvc is crap though. Go the canon)
  6. Suggested cameras Canon HG22, HG21 (Nice size lenses) or if your a fan of sony go the HDRXR520 nice 3.2" Touch screen (its also hi-def res 1400x900 on v/camera screen)

    Just my 2 cents..
    Good luck finding your friends in the sky.




[edit on 23-5-2009 by Avionix]



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 10:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Avionix
I sell video cameras for a living... This camera came out in 2004-05, it runs on Mini-DV tape, its extremly low res (480p) then on top of that your compressing the video even more when uploading to youtube.. Also the "Night Vision/Night Shot/Infared mode" only


Thank you, I was waiting for this information, thank you for bringing it to me, when I get the funds I plan on upgrading, have been looking, but I had a feeling about 3CCD versus 1 and needed clarification.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 10:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Avionix
 


Hey, I am also curious about the on disk storage. Example, what format are these videos in. Sony has that new format, and I use Linux mostly to grab my video, and the closer I can stay to normal formats the better. I kind of like the look of that Canon, I was looking at it at the store. Is that a good disk format, I literally want to drag and drop it to my computer and open it, however I do have a virtualbox container with windows vm install that I can import it with if I have to on my Linux box, but I am curious.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by SoulOrb
reply to post by Avionix
 


Hey, I am also curious about the on disk storage. Example, what format are these videos in. Sony has that new format, and I use Linux mostly to grab my video, and the closer I can stay to normal formats the better. I kind of like the look of that Canon, I was looking at it at the store. Is that a good disk format, I literally want to drag and drop it to my computer and open it, however I do have a virtualbox container with windows vm install that I can import it with if I have to on my Linux box, but I am curious.


If your upgrading to HD the new format is AVCHD as to the older Mpeg2 (DVD) codec. They are the same thing.. except one compresses and displays cleaner at higher resolutions (1920x1080/AVCHD)

Sony, Canon, Panasonic, Jvc, Samsung, Xacti, Toshiba all the new HD video cameras use AVCHD compression its built on Mpeg4 codec also AVCHD is known to be similar to H.264.. anyway your linux system should be able to handle it no probs as long as your system has the codec to play. If your online watch HD videos then you most likely already have it.. (Although youtube uses slightly different HD encoding)

It doesnt matter what medium you are recording to within the data category whether it be HDD, Memory Card or Internal Flash memory they all record the same way. I however find the HDD models generally have larger lenses fitted.. usually 32mm. This enables more light into your sensor.

If you are going with a tape HDV camera you can use to types of tapes to record, either: Mini-DV or HDV. They are the same tape however the HDV has a different coating as to achieve finer results. I have used both and honestly i cannot tell the difference.. It really depends what LCD/Plasma screen your viewing it on.

The tape video cameras have to be exported to your computer via a firewire cable, for HD video you need a 9pin firewire. This is the lowest compression method (28Mbps).. The end result is a massive 50GB+ HDV raw video file..

I suggest if your the amateur use Sony vegas for editing. Pinnicale and Ulead dont see to offer the same sort of flow and tools. If your really want to go nuts use Avid.

ps. The canons have the best processing chip (Digic DV3)

[edit on 23-5-2009 by Avionix]



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:11 AM
link   
I wish i was in Halifax. Would have loved to go out with you to your site one night. I have had my experience but i am too scared i "ask" the wrong ones to pop around


Great video, thanks indeed.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:12 AM
link   
I don't know why people like DGF even come on this website.

Thanks soul, I for one appreciate your contribution regardless of what it is, I mean at the end of the day what could you be "out to get" by posting this other than spreading awareness. There isnt really a benefit in it for you and Ive lost nothing by watching it.

I have tried making a psychic connection with ET's before but all to no avail, I think there is still to much doubt in me but im working on it
Keep up the good work my friend and good luck on your next trip.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Avionix
ps. The canons have the best processing chip (Digic DV3)
[edit on 23-5-2009 by Avionix]


Wow, this is great, I can tell you know your stuff, and this is the info I needed, thank you higher self. I knew someone knew this stuff, and I do not want to tell every store clerk what I do for video, if you see what I mean, plus they would always be able to picture it.

Yes, I am going HDD. I right now edit with Magix Pro on a Vm container on my Linux box, that way I just snap shot the vm container, and can go back to any point. I dump the video now with firewire.

As you might see I do alot of stuff on greenscreen and also I need an external mic port, and I see the one you suggested has that.

Great info, wow this video has been real productive for me to do, got lots of great info, and met some great people.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by qonone
I wish i was in Halifax. Would have loved to go out with you to your site one night. I have had my experience but i am too scared i "ask" the wrong ones to pop around

Great video, thanks indeed.


Yes, I know what you mean. There is a realization, or belief now, that I had in regards to vibration. It is elusive, I plan to put it in a video, however basically if you keep your vibration high and keep the fear away you will partner with the right energies, I think anyway.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by bonsaisert
still to much doubt in me but im working on it
Keep up the good work my friend and good luck on your next trip.


Thank you for your kind words. Try a different inflection. You are not say at one point, making a connection to another point. You are entering their consciousness and they are letting you in.

AS THEY SAID IN THE POEM IN MY CHANNEL THROUGH MY BUDDY

When you come in
enter as you will
take what you want
and just be still

You, are entering there, a portion of your consciounesness is entering there, which yes, does change you eventually.

PS: Note to space brothers, sorry for the porn I watched the other day, I might have dropped your group consciousness vibration down a little, but thanks for letting me non the less, besides, what is a small hit for the team.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:37 AM
link   
This is nutty. It's funny how all the fevered skepticism begins to sound like so much chatter once you've actually had your own experience.

I think that it's very important to be discerning, but let me say something about these questions of ignorance and gullibility.

I can't remember when I first put out the call, but I know that I didn't start seeing them until I was ready to. I only saw them once I had fully satisfied myself that they were possible, only after months of intensive research and soul-searching, overcoming a materialist-rationalist upbringing and the thought abstractions fed to me doing critical theory at university. Only once I relearned everything was I able to have this experience.

The amount of work any individual has to do varies enormously, but we're all laden with false conceptions that make us think we're being clever when we're actually refusing to consider new information because we're trapped by our old information.

[edit on 23-5-2009 by Jac84]



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 11:46 AM
link   
SoulOrb, bless you for having the courage to come forward like this. I am an experiencer who has had more sightings than I can ever count, and I am becoming more convinced that at least some of the intelligences navigating these objects can respond to my thoughts when they so choose. The more experiences I have, the more this is solidified as my own personal truth.

The crazy thing is, I absolutely understand how even though one has these interactions, how concurrently difficult it can be to DOCUMENT them, as most of my interactions are very quick and fleeting, or at such a distance that recording them is an excersize in futility.

I do get the sense that a face to face (or consciousness to consciousness) encounter is on the horizon, and I am excited to think of the possibilities behind the exchange.

Keep up the great work friend.




top topics



 
37
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join