It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why a NWO is impossible and impractical

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 21 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   
Whether there is a NWO plot or not, I don't think we should worry, because it's impossible and impractical to implement, and even if you could, you can't sustain it.

There is no way the whole world will worship only ONE creed, serve ONE government or ONE religion.

The world is too diverse for that. Even if a secret elite did manage to capture the world, they could never keep it for long before someone overthrows them. History has shown this time and time again.

Even the greatest conquerors (Alexander the Great, Napoleon) who took over a large part of the world could not sustain their Empires. Someone always overthrew them, assassinated them, defeated them, or they died and lost their Empire.

So you see, even if there really is a NWO plot, it will fail. And even if it succeeds, the success will only be short term. It can't last very long before someone overthrows them. There can never be a centralized fascist government.

The only way the world will unite will be in peace, love, mutual cooperation and higher shared consciousness.

It can never unite using tactics of fear, power and control. Those type of conquests are always short lived, no matter how great or powerful those leaders are.

So all you who fear a NWO or chip implant future have nothing to worry about. You can rest easy.

Besides, a microchip could never take away free will. Our consciousness would transcend it.

That's what I have to say.

[edit on 21-5-2009 by WWu777]




posted on May, 22 2009 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by WWu777
 

Dear WWu777,

Your optimism is truly admirable!

No one ever said the NWO was rational. Most think quite the opposite.

But not many would say the Nazis of Germany in the 1930's were rational, either. But they somehow managed to mass murder thousands of people (I think that's an understatement), not counting those who died in the war they were involved with.

Our concern is not with the workability of this criminal plan. Our concern is with the chaos it has caused, is causing and will continue to cause, the chances of stopping or impeding it, and the possibility, in a nuclear age, of losing our "playing field" as a result of it.

Our hope is that unveiling it might ultimately rob it of its power.



posted on May, 22 2009 @ 12:25 AM
link   
reply to post by WWu777
_____________________________________________________________

Uh.........okay. Whatever you would like to believe, by all means, go for it!! However, I believe you are, sadly, mistaken friend!! Too much evidence to support otherwise.









posted on May, 22 2009 @ 12:52 AM
link   
reply to post by WWu777
 


sure our conscious will be forever sacred and secure ..sure...until they implant the brain chip

www.cnn.com...


How it would work
The BrainGate Neural Interface is being developed by Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems Inc. in Foxborough, Massachusetts.

The device is a 4 by 4 millimeter arrangement of 100 electrodes. It is surgically implanted in the motor cortex, the part of the brain responsible for creating movement in the limbs.

The implanted chip connects to a small platform protruding from the patient's skull that is linked to an external processor.

If the system works as hoped, the chip detects and sends signals from the motor cortex to the processor, which interprets them and feeds them into a computer.


can we say 'cyborg'?


"What national security experts and civil libertarians want to know is, why would the Defense Department want to do such a thing?" the article asks. The answer lies in the stated goal of the US military - "Total Spectrum Dominance".



The project is developing technology that "promises to directly read thoughts from a living brain - and even instill thoughts as well... It does not take much imagination to see in this the makings of a matrix-like cyberpunk dystopia: chips that impose false memories, machines that scan for wayward thoughts, cognitively augmented government security forces that impose a ruthless order on a recalcitrant population." The Globe reported.

Government funded advances in neurotechnology which also focus on developing the ability to essentially read people's minds should also set alarm bells ringing.

It is also well documented that the military and the federal government have been dabbling in mind control and manipulation experimentation for decades.


connect the dots



posted on May, 22 2009 @ 12:56 AM
link   
[edit on 22-5-2009 by Butter Cookie]



posted on May, 22 2009 @ 03:52 PM
link   
Butter cookie, that CNN source was about helping people with paralysis to walk again. It's for medical purposes only.

To attempt to implant everyone with it is impractical and a huge stretch. Most people would be against it.

And even if they did implant it in everyone, eventually there would be a revolution. A system of total control is always unstable. And doesn't last long either.



posted on May, 22 2009 @ 03:53 PM
link   

"What national security experts and civil libertarians want to know is, why would the Defense Department want to do such a thing?" the article asks. The answer lies in the stated goal of the US military - "Total Spectrum Dominance".



The project is developing technology that "promises to directly read thoughts from a living brain - and even instill thoughts as well... It does not take much imagination to see in this the makings of a matrix-like cyberpunk dystopia: chips that impose false memories, machines that scan for wayward thoughts, cognitively augmented government security forces that impose a ruthless order on a recalcitrant population." The Globe reported.

Government funded advances in neurotechnology which also focus on developing the ability to essentially read people's minds should also set alarm bells ringing.

It is also well documented that the military and the federal government have been dabbling in mind control and manipulation experimentation for decades.


Can I see the source for the above two paragraphs? Or the link?



posted on May, 22 2009 @ 05:28 PM
link   
reply to post by WWu777
 


heres the link:
www.cnn.com...

You say its not possible?

The Brain Chip: A Prison for your Mind

the clip begins with an endorsement by Hilary Clintonwww.youtube.com...

and also


Scientists develop 'brain chip'
BBC News, March 12, 2003
Posted: 2006-12-23 17:33:21
news.bbc.co.uk...

US scientists say a silicon chip could be used to replace the hippocampus, where the storage of memories is co-ordinated. They are due to start testing the device on rats' brains shortly. If that goes well, the Californian researchers will test the artificial hippocampus in live rats within six months and then monkeys trained to carry out memory tasks before progressing to human trials once the chip has been proved to be safe. The hippocampus is an area at the base of the brain in humans, close to the junction with the spinal cord. It is believed it "encodes" experiences so they can be stored as long-term memories in another part of the brain. the researchers were able to devise a mathematical model of a whole hippocampus. The model was then programmed on to a chip. They suggest the chip would sit on a patient's skull, rather than inside the brain. Bernard Williams, a philosopher at Oxford University, UK, who is an expert in personal identity, said people might find the technology hard to accept at first.

Note: Consider that top secret military experiments in almost all fields are generally at least a decade ahead of anything reported in the media. What do you think they might have developed by now? Could they have developed a way to erase and even replace memories? For more, click here.


and how about a super-army

www.informationliberation.com...

US military experts are attempting to create an army of super-human soldiers who will be more intelligent and deadly thanks to a microchip implanted in their brains.

Scientists believe the implant will vastly improve the memory of troops so that they can recall every detail of their training and become more effective fighters.

Researchers at the University of Southern California's bio-engineering department have created the chip, which acts in exactly the same way as the hippocampus - the part of the brain that deals with memory.

In experiments, the team removed that section of the brain of dead rats and inserted the chip in its place. The implant sent exactly the same electronic signals as the real thing.

The next stage of the project is to test the implant on live animals. If this work proves to be as successful, experiments could one day be carried out on soldiers.



posted on May, 22 2009 @ 05:52 PM
link   
reply to post by WWu777
 

WWU777 you do not understand the NWO agenda.

I is not to have a one anything. It is to control all the major governments of the world through the world bank so it can suck them dry so that the population will give in to the demands and give up individual rights and liberties. After all the evidence the Builderberg group just being one of many, I am very surprised that you still do not believe that the super rich want to control the flow of money so that the majority of the money is always flowing to them. Go to the web and type in -Operation Vampire Killer 2000-this is a group of Police Officers and Military men who are fighting tooth an nail to get the word out sine 1992. Before them it was the John Birch society. I have a big long list of who these people are if you would like to see it and check it out for your self your more than welcome to it.
STEP BACK AND TAKE A REAL GOOD LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING AROUND YOU!.............................................KMG



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 05:23 AM
link   
Previous empires littered throughout history always had a figurehead. A single point of attack which is why a group of founding people would be harder to take apart.

Also, history is littered with revolts coming from the desperate and peasants. It is no wonder they have defined 'poverty' as a number now or a benchmark. It gives a target to aim for to not eradicate unhappy people but desparate people. Wiping out poverty is high on all agendas, especially Britains, Things have slowed but not halted.

Meanwhile, the approach to lending over the last decade has meant there are people locked into debt, coming out of each month with no real disposable income.



"But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction - indeed, in some sense was the destruction - of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared.

If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away.

In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance. To return to the agricultural past, as some thinkers about the beginning of the twentieth century dreamed of doing, was not a practicable solution. It conflicted with the tendency towards mechanization which had become quasi-instinctive throughout almost the whole world, and moreover, any country which remained industrially backward was helpless in a military sense and was bound to be dominated, directly or indirectly, by its more advanced rivals.


This is somewhat true, that people recognising that Labour have stolen the consersatives clothes and become them, passing through policies that were waved away by the people previously.

In the second world war, the country needed a conservative leader to take us into war, afterwards we needed to harness the working classes so Labour was used as the tool for the people. Straight afterwards we were back into conflict with the conservatives.

We're the most surveilled country in the world, yet these cameras are not being placed in dark allies or in places that everyday citizens walk to make them feel safe. They are put in mainstreamplaces, where activists, demonstrations and rebellions would be most likely to parade through the cities. The rest are placed in locations that make it very hard not to be tracked, car parks, bus station, train stations, airports and lastly it attacks the academics. Schools, universities under scrutiny, and the amazing thing is they have accepted these measures because of one terror agenda. Strange how so many school shootings end up in suicide or the people disappear off the face of the planet shortly afterwards.

Meanwhile the age of (mis)information has started. Wikipedia becoming the font of all knowledge. Documentation that can be updated and changed on a whim, taken as truth by 95% of people who visit there with a lot of 'citation needed' sentences. What, like 80% of homework comes directly from there now?!?!

I believe it's coming. Sadly I believe complacency and clever poverty policies have eradicated a threat of uprising in most places.



posted on May, 23 2009 @ 05:34 AM
link   
reply to post by WWu777
 


I hope that the NWO is not about to happen. However, I think that you are wrong.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join