Originally posted by Saurus
False - the difference is that in Freemasonry, you give the oath line by line, and you're free to stop at any time if there is a single point you don't agree with.
Why would they make you agree in advance, then?? Additionally the candidate is told that the oath will not conflict with his neighbor, his country or his god, which he later discovers to be false.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
You will forfeit your very life if you break this obligation.
False. The ritual specifically implies that the inclusion of any penalty is unnecessary, because the obligation is binding on your conscience.
This should be good news to ex-Masons who fear for their lives.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
And that is fair enough, because that is what you agree to.
No mason agrees to any such thing.
They agree to whatever the Worshipful Master says.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Blindfolded, with a hangman's noose around your neck, and a dagger held at your heart you swear an oath under duress you have no knowledge of beforehand, that you cannot later revoke.
Absolutely false.
Please provide the correct wording, then.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Sounds like fun, huh?
I enjoyed my initiation tremendously, and felt a great pride in the oath I took.
You took pride in swearing to have your tongue cut out and buried at the seashore? Wow, reminds me of a documentary I saw about the Mormons.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
I would like some of you Craft Brethren to deny this is true.
See my comments above for clarification on what is true and what isn't.
Too bad you didn't explain in any amount of detail whatsoever.






