It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wclv13
reply to post by Soloist
So ya showed some pics from Sturgis (whoo hoo) that is like saying it would be crazy for someone to show up to their hometeam baseball game wearing all their colors in glory. DUH of course they are dressing up.
Come on, you knew darn well I was talking about everday attire. Try again.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
reply to post by ATH911
the issue here is first off, declaring harley man a government spook/conspirator to the mass murder of thousands without some scrap of evidence is ethically wrong. And thus, after declaring the man an agent of evil with no evidence
Originally posted by Dr Love
You see, we shouldn't be arguing whether someone actually wears a Harley shirt and a Harley hat at the same time, it takes you away from the core argument and it's irrelevant.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I posted it on the other thread, and I will ask again here.
WHERE IS THE PROOF?
You know, more than some guy on the internet from a blog saying "Ha! we have proved it's Humphrey!" without any explanation or evidence of how exactly this absolute conclusion was reached.
If it has been proven to be Humphrey, then please post links here on how. Did he admit it, or did someone close to him, or Rick Leventhal, come out and say so? Have facial recognition/voice analysis tapes been done, like member Lombardi at least attempted to do with Rob Riggle?
Evidence, not just some blogger's claim "it's Humphrey" without saying how he got there.
It's the same damned thing with Riggle. I could go on some blog and claim "Ha! It's been conclusively proven Harley man is Jabba the Hut!" Does it make it so simply because I claimed to have discovered this "fact"? Nope, not until I explain exactly HOW I reached that conclusion.
The Fox video quality sucks. If the person who claims to have confirmed it's Humphrey did so merely on a crappy comparison of pictures, then I shall toss this "claim" into the grey basket until someone does something more substantial.
Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
reply to post by wclv13
Granted,
This individual and the so-called on the street interview have never sat well with me, especially given the near NIST-like manner and seemingly predetermined conclusions he states as fact only moments after having taken place, but to base Any sort of conclusion with regards his person or being based solely upon what he's wearing is utter nonsense.
Originally posted by Darthorious
The problem with this idea, assuming this is an/the actor, is that just because he happened to be there doesn't mean he was acting. Even if he was making comments about facts he had no knowledge about.
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by Darthorious
The way he's dress is so obvious, his happy demeanor is so obvious, him knowing the official collapse reasoning is so obvious. What's not obvious about him?
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
reply to post by ATH911
As far as I know he lived in NY and had no movies/etc. going on at this time.