It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The True Face of Iraq

page: 10
0
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 09:58 AM
link   
None of this matters, as the only reason we were allowed in Iraq was to find the weapons of mass destruction...they weren't there, end of story.




posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 09:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Satyr
I don't care if people live in the damn jungle and eat each other, as long as it has nothing to do with America! Should we put a stop to jungle tribes with cruel and unusual rituals, too?


A minute ago you were yibbing about Internation law...but now in the same breath you dont care about our internation civil rights granted to us?...



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shoktek
None of this matters, as the only reason we were allowed in Iraq was to find the weapons of mass destruction...they weren't there, end of story.


We werent allowed there for a LONG time...cause they do need time to hide and move things....



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix
We werent allowed there for a LONG time...cause they do need time to hide and move things....


Right. It's not like all of our special operatives and troops that have been there for months and months now are just looking under random rocks for weapons...they would have been found by now, it's very hard to just "hide" the amount of weapons we accused them of still having, or move them for that matter without being found.



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix

Originally posted by Satyr
I don't care if people live in the damn jungle and eat each other, as long as it has nothing to do with America! Should we put a stop to jungle tribes with cruel and unusual rituals, too?


A minute ago you were yibbing about Internation law...but now in the same breath you dont care about our internation civil rights granted to us?...

WTF are you talking about? We don't have jungles here, nor do we practice cannibalism (on a wide scale, anyway). What in the hell does that have to do with our civil rights?

[Edited on 4-30-2004 by Satyr]



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Satyr

Originally posted by BasementAddix

Originally posted by Satyr
I don't care if people live in the damn jungle and eat each other, as long as it has nothing to do with America! Should we put a stop to jungle tribes with cruel and unusual rituals, too?


A minute ago you were yibbing about Internation law...but now in the same breath you dont care about our internation civil rights granted to us?...

WTF are you talking about? We don't have jungles here. What in the hell does that have to do with our civil rights?

[Edited on 4-30-2004 by Satyr]



You said we shouldnt care about people in jungles yada yada....and the civil rights Im speaking of is the UN....not the US....rights....You were very adiment about internation law but obviously dont care about internation civil rights...



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shoktek

Originally posted by BasementAddix
We werent allowed there for a LONG time...cause they do need time to hide and move things....


Right. It's not like all of our special operatives and troops that have been there for months and months now are just looking under random rocks for weapons...they would have been found by now, it's very hard to just "hide" the amount of weapons we accused them of still having, or move them for that matter without being found.


They may not be in Iraq anymore...neighbors?...terrorist country neighbors perhaps....



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix
You said we shouldnt care about people in jungles yada yada....and the civil rights Im speaking of is the UN....not the US....rights....You were very adiment about internation law but obviously dont care about internation civil rights...

I have no idea what your talking about.
I don't think I ever even mentioned international law, did I?

[Edited on 4-30-2004 by Satyr]



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Satyr

Originally posted by BasementAddix
You said we shouldnt care about people in jungles yada yada....and the civil rights Im speaking of is the UN....not the US....rights....You were very adiment about internation law but obviously dont care about internation civil rights...

I have no idea what your talking about.



......lol....forget it....



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:08 AM
link   
Way to change the subject. Those numbers still don't add up for you?
Or you just don't care? It's not a shock? You want to give away hundreds of billions of dollars to lost causes? Remember, we're not talking about stopping world domination by another country here, we are the dominators this time. They want to stop us. Maybe with good reason, from what I'm seeing from Americans. I think you've all lost your freaking minds!


[Edited on 4-30-2004 by Satyr]



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix
They may not be in Iraq anymore...neighbors?...terrorist country neighbors perhaps....


Oh! Of course, they must be in all of the "terrorist country neighbors" caves! No matter how all the weapons would have been smuggled out of Iraq without being noticed by anyone, but I'm sure that's where they are. hell, we were SURE Iraq had weapons, but now it's clear they didn't, let's just invade MORE COUNTRIES and find zero weapons once again, causing more and more international turmoil.



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shoktek

Originally posted by BasementAddix
They may not be in Iraq anymore...neighbors?...terrorist country neighbors perhaps....


Oh! Of course, they must be in all of the "terrorist country neighbors" caves! No matter how all the weapons would have been smuggled out of Iraq without being noticed by anyone, but I'm sure that's where they are. hell, we were SURE Iraq had weapons, but now it's clear they didn't, let's just invade MORE COUNTRIES and find zero weapons once again, causing more and more international turmoil.

We should invade countries that are nearby that have WMD, eh? That way, when we do find some, we can say they came from Iraq with definitive authority. Oh, how proud we'll be of ourselves.

I'm just glad they got those aluminum tubes out of Iraq. I was very worried about those tubes.


[Edited on 4-30-2004 by Satyr]



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:14 AM
link   
You dont thinks its possible that Syria has them?...at all?...and as for the numbers (the post above yours)....they dont add up....23k x 200million americans...over 50 years....and 23k per person goes to isreal....not possible...then our counrty would have NO money for itself...zip...zitlch....



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix
You dont thinks its possible that Syria has them?...at all?...and as for the numbers (the post above yours)....they dont add up....23k x 200million americans...over 50 years....and 23k per person goes to isreal....not possible...then our counrty would have NO money for itself...zip...zitlch....


Members of the Bush administration have already mentioned that they don't believe Syria has any of the weapons, and if there were any REAL shred of evidence that Syria did take them into possession, they wouldn't have said that. And no, there is no real evidence to suggest they were moved to Syria...just some clever propaganda whipped up online to try to save Bush's ass before election time.



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Syria is a known terrorist supporter as well as a known Saddam supporter...its not hard to link the two of them together....



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix
You dont thinks its possible that Syria has them?...at all?...and as for the numbers (the post above yours)....they dont add up....23k x 200million americans...over 50 years....and 23k per person goes to isreal....not possible...then our counrty would have NO money for itself...zip...zitlch....

No offense, but are you really that dense? That's the number of estimated dollars each Israeli would receive if it was divided evenly among them. Divide the total cost by the population of Israel.
Try to comprehend this. I know it's tough. Here...do some reading. Educate yourself...

www.wrmea.com...

[Edited on 4-30-2004 by Satyr]



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix
Syria is a known terrorist supporter as well as a known Saddam supporter...its not hard to link the two of them together....


And that statement right there gives me all the proof I need to invade Syria...you're going to have to do a lot better than that bud, there are millions of "known terrorist supporters" and "saddam supporters" all over the place, and I don't know where you even got that from anyway.



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Satyr

Originally posted by BasementAddix
You dont thinks its possible that Syria has them?...at all?...and as for the numbers (the post above yours)....they dont add up....23k x 200million americans...over 50 years....and 23k per person goes to isreal....not possible...then our counrty would have NO money for itself...zip...zitlch....

No offense, but are you really that dense? That's the number of estimated dollars each Israeli would receive if it was divided evenly among them. Divide the population of Israel by the total cost.
Try to comprehend this. I know it's tough.



relax yourself...im not arguing how much money they recieve...im arguing how much it cost ME...YOU...the general citizen a year...and it aint 23k in taxes...


[Edited on 4/30/2004 by BasementAddix]



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by BasementAddix

Originally posted by Colonel
I wonder if this is what were supposed to be doing in Iraq? Is this what we're supposed to be proud of? Now, can anyone deny my claim that we shouldn't be there?

whatreallyhappened.com...


Dont let a few rotten apples f-it up for the rest of them...


I really think its much more than a few. Remember that video where some soldiers shot and killed an Iraqi man who lay already dying? Then, laughed about it? I think that's more common b/c of the war mentality.

Please see this article:

We're supposed to believe that these are just a few rotten apples, that the overwhelming majority of U.S. occupation troops are regular Boy Scouts, busy building schools and helping little old ladies cross streets. To which one can only reply: Baloney!

Two competing narratives about the American occupiers are now vying for attention. One the one hand, we have Pat Tillman, the football hero who enlisted shortly after 9/11, with his square clean visage, almost a caricature of idealized American manhood, a selfless martyr who gave his all for a righteous cause. And on the other hand we have the grinning leering perverts of Abu Ghraib. Which is the real face of the American occupiers: John Wayne in "Flying Leathernecks" or John Holmes in "Freaky Leatherboys"?

Just ask the Iraqis, who, according to the latest Gallup poll, see their American occupiers as "uncaring, dangerous and lacking in respect for the country's people, religion and traditions." USA Today reports:

"Only a third of the Iraqi people now believe that the American-led occupation of their country is doing more good than harm, and a solid majority support an immediate military pullout even though they fear that could put them in greater danger, according to a new USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll...."

www.antiwar.com...



posted on Apr, 30 2004 @ 10:28 AM
link   
I highly doubt its more then 1-2% of our troops doing such things...atleast that serious.....




top topics



 
0
<< 7  8  9    11  12 >>

log in

join