It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Drugging as interrogation?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:
die_another_day

posted on May, 20 2009 @ 10:31 PM
link   
In the midst of all the media coverage of torture and Guantanamo Bay, I came up with an idea. Since pain and convulsions do not force people to talk, why not drug them?

Oh wait, we have, the KGB used it, and because the KGB used it, the West had to ban it under international law. CIA quit using it because they thought it was not reliable. So, the world resorted to inflicting pain and treating each other like animals trying to extort information. Is this information reliable? What is reliable? How can we know if some information is reliable or not if we do not even know the truth?

If painful and physical torture can not be proven to be "reliable," why not resort to drugs?


spirit_horse

posted on May, 20 2009 @ 11:30 PM
link   


If painful and physical torture can not be proven to be "reliable," why not resort to drugs?


I'm all for drugged interrogation. As long as there were no permanent side effects.

Anyway, I love your avatar and the 'give a damn' gif!



 
0

log in

join


The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of AboveTopSecret.com.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.

All content copyright 2024, AboveTopSecret.com