Originally posted by Finalized
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by Stormdancer777
See this is where you misunderstand me. Sure some handicapped people can be an added benefit to society. That is why I leave it to the parents to
decide if they want to raise this kid until they are 80. We may benefit to a degree by watching this handicapped person, but we arent the ones
suffering on a daily basis to take care of them.
Sure, just look at Dr. Stephen Hawking, I think we can all say that he's a benefit to society.
I bet Hawking would rather be completely normal in every other respect and have the same mind. If we proceed with a program of eugenics to select
against such diseases then people will be born who are just as gifted, but won't have the handicap.
Once people are around - deal with it - before they are around we can start using our brains to stop children from being born into tragedy.
Eugenics is necessary at some point - either that or stop using any kind of medication for disease and just let people freaking die so they can't
breed and perpetuate their sickness on innocent children because of their own selfish desire to propagate themselves.
Why would anyone want to be born handicapped in any way - people who were never born don't complain about it.
Life is suffering, the dead don't suffer, neither do those who never were (because the parents decided to adopt or something because they carry
genetic flaws).
I certainly believe people can be morally killed for certain reasons - and abortion is certainly killing, but having a child who is not loved is a
worse crime.
People have this stuck in their head that killing is bad - then those same people say "SEND TROOPS TO IRAQ!" " SEND TROOPS TO AFGHANISTAN". Then
off those guys go - and kill millions of perfectly healthy people, creating untold human misery - for the profit of a few.
Then if you ever say anything bad about the US military - they will jump on you like you told the Pope to go fk himself. When is it complicity? When
are you not responsible for endorsing or carrying out acts to promote human suffering? When you are told its protecting your country, and your too
brain-dead and brainwashed to realize the truth?
People should have a good think about their values and try for some consistency. Their are good reasons for killing some people - but you might want
to have a think about what makes a good reason.
A reason to kill is to prevent human suffering - by killing a sociopath who has shown a record of causing human suffering (like the secret
controllers), or killing an unborn child if it is going to be born in suffering, or killing someone who is already suffering and wants to die.
These are all moral reasons to kill. Killing an unwanted baby may sound selfish - but abandoning a child, or mistreating it is worse - better that it
dies before it suffers needlessly. You can't legally enforce love and affection.