US: I was called a terrorist, and threatened..., page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 69 times


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 07:25 PM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Mozzy



Good observation, I think the place in question is just such a place. I have only been in there one other time and it was only for a few minutes I was kinda checking it out. This time I there a bit longer and disaster!


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 07:29 PM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Breifne



Good idea, but being that I was alone on the receiving end I suppose more then likely the group including the bartender would deny any wrong doing on their behalf.


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 07:30 PM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Apology is Policy



Ya, I was not in any way trying to force any of this on anybody, I just made my belief's known with respect to the context of the conversation, and look what happened.


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 07:44 PM by opal13
reply to post by Pappa_Bear



Exactly. I tend just to keep my mouth shut most of the time, especially when around alot of people I don't know well, or at all, and keep the chit chat to neutral inane topics.


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 08:41 PM by bubbabuddha
reply to post by groingrinder



Maybe you were in a bar for the KING'S minions? Apparently the revolution was hatched in brewery pubs, so obviously these people would have called our founding fathers "terrorists" rather than deny their love of the status quo and the state media.



[edit on 20-5-2009 by bubbabuddha]


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 08:54 PM by cautiouslypessimistic
reply to post by opal13



Frankly, it's because that's exactly what "they" want.

There are so many forms of seperation in american society, it's rather disgusting.

You can't like those people, they're "illegal".

Watch out for those people, they may have "swine flu"

Don't interact with that child, son, they're "poor"

It truly is everywhere in this country.





reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 09:11 PM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by alyosha1981



Quite a few stars I see.....unfortunately, this post is the exact opposite of the bar you were in. Everyone here blindly accepts what you posted...well, except for me that is.

NORAD stood down...nope, didnt happen that day, doesnt happen ANY day.

Lack of wreckage...again, not true, plenty of wreckage at both Shanksville and the Pentagon. However, people with little to no experience with aircraft accidents continually swallow this falsehood

Jet fighters were ordered hundreds of miles away...again, didnt happen. The fighters assigned to continental air defense were right where they were supposed to be that day. In other words, they were on their strip alerts at their bases...not hundreds of miles away. What you, and appearantly the majority of the "truth" movement cannot accept or understand is that prior to 9/11/01, there were less than 20 aircraft assigned to continental air defense (20 airplanes, 48 contingious states...do the math). The United States does not maintain the rest of the fighters of the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps in an armed for combat status. Just because websites list "combat-ready" does not mean the planes sit on the flightlines armed to the teeth.

Northwoods, Pearl Harbor...all meaningless distractions, used by certain members of the "truth" movement to make money off of gullible people.


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 09:53 PM by Pappa_Bear
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to
post by alyosha1981



Quite a few stars I see.....unfortunately, this post is the exact opposite of the bar you were in. Everyone here blindly accepts what you posted...well, except for me that is.



Actually, I haven't seen everyone blindly accepting what the OP posted as far as his/hers beliefs as fact; instead we have aplauded the desire to pass on what he/she feels is the truth, understanding when the situation got to bad that it was not worth fighting over and have high hopes that atleast someone from the original conversation would now start thinking and researching for themselves, and hoepefully some of us have given what we feel in our opinion may be advice in such a way the OP may be able to continue passing on thier beliefs but in a manner that might be a little more accepted or at the very least considered without the negative feedback just for stating a personal belief.

I hope that makes some sense. We can all learn from each other, as one persons idea contains some truth, if we all listen to each other we may find one day; that we all now know the whole truth.

[edit on 20/5/2009 by Pappa_Bear]


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 10:02 PM by SPreston
posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to
post by alyosha1981



Quite a few stars I see.....unfortunately, this post is the exact opposite of the bar you were in. Everyone here blindly accepts what you posted...well, except for me that is.



Pounding your personal religious beliefs into our heads again Swampfox?

Might work on those gullible fools in that bar; but you are wasting your time on us.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^