It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tyr Sog
Did I just hear the fine Dr. say, "sudo capitalist, Military Complex and Detroit "?
Why would Detroit be mentioned along with those two? Does DC have bigger plans for the SE Detroit region and it's soon to be unoccupied manufacturing plants(I'm not sure most realize how many plants there are in this area or the size of them)? How coinvenient would that be for Washington and their next Arsenal of Democracy to be able to waltz on in and convert them over for military items. Like in the 40's they are nearly already setup by default to start up military production.
Maybe there's more to this auto industry bankruptcy then meets the eye. Maybe I missed heard him and he didn't say "Detroit" lol. Maybe he did and there's a whole other reason everyone knows about . I just missed it in the MSM that I hardly watch lol.
[edit on 20-5-2009 by Tyr Sog]
Originally posted by disgustedbyhumanity
I agree with Ron that we need change. We just don't need the Ron Paul type of change. Ron wants the corporations to be completely free from regulation. We are in this spot because of the abuses corporations have bestowed upon the people. Why do we want to give them even more freedom to abuse us? Thats what i don't get about Ron Paul. He is right about then problems, but his solutions do not really solve them. (unless you have a bunch of Capital)
Originally posted by Tyr Sog
Did I just hear the fine Dr. say, "sudo capitalist, Military Complex and Detroit "?
Why would Detroit be mentioned along with those two? Does DC have bigger plans for the SE Detroit region and it's soon to be unoccupied manufacturing plants(I'm not sure most realize how many plants there are in this area or the size of them)? How coinvenient would that be for Washington and their next Arsenal of Democracy to be able to waltz on in and convert them over for military items. Like in the 40's they are nearly already setup by default to start up military production.
[edit on 20-5-2009 by Tyr Sog]
It's a shame that this will fall on deaf ears. I can only imagine how many Americans would agree with much of what he is saying.
Originally posted by jd140
I think we need to move away from Ron Paul.
While his ideas are great and are what we need. He won't be the one to give them to us.
He will never be in a posistion to act on his words. He will never be President or be on a Presidential Cabinet. Who knows how long he will continue to be in office.
I like Ron Paul as much as the next guy, but I think its time we started to find somebody else.
I hear his son is going to run for office.
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by Bspiracy
His son is planning on running for office (last I heard) and from what I hear his ideals are just like his father. So we should look to move away from Ron Paul and start looking for someone who could possibly be a running mate for Paul jr(forget his name).
Obama has 2012 locked in. So we need to look forward to the 2016 elections. You think Ron Paul will be around?
I'm simply looking into the future. You take it how you want. I'm being realistic.
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by Bspiracy
LOL
You can put me down all you want to. You have yet to counter anything I have said. I doubt you would even know how.