reply to post by toreishi
Edrick did forget to mention ECM (electronic countermeasures) and EW (electronic warfare), both of which i think contribute to a significant
workload on the F-22's CIP.
Well, all in all, you only really have 2 forms of countermeasures.
One form is the Flare/chaff that are decidedly non computer intensive operations (Weapon lock warning; Chaff for Radar, Flares for IR missiles.)
The second, is your Electronic warfare... and that is hardly Processor intensive.
It is merely a transmission of "Static" at the effective transmission frequency of the Radar to be jammed.
Specific frequency, or full spectrum... its just a radio transmitter.
But that does not really matter.
Military hardware are not designed to be "Multitasking" one size fits all machines.
They are completely dedicated pieces of hardware, whose design mirrors its specific function.
Todays modern desktop computers can handle more operations per second than military hardware...
But the military hardware is dedicated solely to its task.
There is no multitasking, or parallel threads in Avionics computer systems.
One Bus per function.
The primary reason for this design, is redundancy (Which I think has been mentioned before)
Bottom line, you just don't NEED that kind of raw "Horsepower" out of military grade electronic hardware.
But, it MUST be able to function WELL above what is required for Commercial or Private use (Speaking of stability of the overall system)
And, as Now_Then has stated.... the smaller circuit sizes of the newer processors make them notoriously unreliable (And thus, completely useless for
military apps.)
And this is one of the reasons that Russian military hardware is On par with American military hardware.
It is not MEANT to be bleeding edge tech.
IT is meant to be ROCK SOLID tech.
When you are designing a military, you want to build weapons that WORK, not nessecarily the most expensive and complicated thing that you can.
Just take a look at the kalashnikov for example...
All technological indicators would place the M-16 as the best broad use assault weapon in the world...
But it is more complicated to manufacture, it is heavier, it jams more frequently, requires more maintenance, etc, etc, etc...
I mean... the F-22 needs 3 hours of maintenance per hour of flight time, it IS a technological marvel of military engineering... but does it
FUNCTION?
Does it WORK?
-Edrick