Thanks for the reply, Byrd.
I would love to see the info contradicting the 'official' accounts of Ed, if and when you have the time. Yes, I would love to see his old site 10
miles south, and the quarry, but I live on the other coastline. So until the kid is grown up, my wife and I retire, and we buy a Winnebego, it ain't
gonna happen anytime soon.
Devino,
Exactly. Consider the 'calendar' site at Nabta Playa and Stonehenge. If you were to turn the N/S alignment at Nabta 15-20 degrees west and overlay
it over Stonehenge that N/S alignment fits perfectly over the N/NW and S/SE barrows at the outer circumference of Stonehenge. At which you can see
the line representing the summer solstice matches perfectly with the long NW ditch running to the Avon river. No bodies were found at either of those
sites.
If we were to follow Dr. Brophy's assessment of the large monoliths south of the 'calendar' site at Nabta, (that they represent the positions of 6
stars, which are Dubhe, 3 stars of Orion's belt, and Sirius... and using a unit measurement of 0.799 meters = 1 lightyear then they accurately
display the actual distances of those stars) we find that there is a large group of mounds located south of Stonehenge. I used google earth and
measured the distances of those mounds from Stonehenge and it seems if there is a correlation between the two sites then the unit measurement at the
Stonehenge site would pretty much be 1 meter = 1 lightyear. Perhaps Dr. Brophy outlines this in his book, which I haven't read.
Now, I wonder, have any bodies been found at those mounds south of Stonehenge? And if the two sites are so closely related what can we infer from the
actual outer and inner rings and specific blue stones at Stonehenge? Are there more 'stars'/mounds around Stonehenge we should be taking note of
and comparing to our star charts? What other henges and mounds should we review for comparison?
Furthermore, what I find almost more interesting than these two specific sites is the grouping of 30 'complex structures' relatively near the
calendar site at Nabta. Again, for those who haven't read it yet it's about in the middle of the article...
www.comp-archaeology.org...
Given these people's obvious accomplishments, I think these pits served a completely different purpose than symbolic burial chambers for large
'roughly shaped bovine' slabs. I think cross disciplines may shed more light on their purposes, a far more practical purpose for digging 2-4 meter
holes in the desert directly over quartzitic formations.
[edit on 24-5-2009 by Flux8]