It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by JimOberg
How about something simpler. Is the scene shot in daylight or darkness?
That sure could help set the visual context of the dots.
You have a tendency to ask questions which would have been answered had you only bothered to view the data you are attacking.
Originally posted by sum-one
In the shadow of something? Like what?
And I think you are trying to say that UFO's must be made of reflective material? But this isn't necessarily so.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
So you still haven't been able to ascertain the identity of the object in the OP.... It is okay to admit that have you failed to debunk this one - the thread will always be here.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by Exuberant1
However, since the shuttle's thruster is not oriented anywhere near the direction of the UFOs in this video, it cannot be used to account for their anomalous motions, nor can parallax.
Nice try, Exubie. I'll bet you have no earthly (or even unearthly) idea which direction the shuttle thrusters are oriented. So to provide pseudo-evidence, you just 'make up' this assertion about the thruster orientation to convince people who still consider you a reliable source of factual information.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
...But as you already know; the UFO would still exist regardless of the shuttle's orientation which cannot account for the object's existence. ..
Your version of the thruster argument is moot.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Here is a new STS-63 UFO which was spotted by the MIR and subject to a zoom-in.
STS-63 is the mission where a practice rendezvous was performed by the shuttle Discovery And the MIR Space station.
From Martyn Stubbs NASA UFO Archives - The NEW STS-63 UFO
[snip]
*Note: As MIR is filming both the shuttle and the UFO - We know that the object cannot be Mir or the Shuttle (which is clearly visible).
Does anyone what what the UFO could be?
[edit on 20-5-2009 by Exuberant1]
Originally posted by The Shrike
There's no sense in trying to deal with Jim Oberg as he's stuck in some kind of warp that doesn't allow him to see anything but the results of thrusters even when they're out of commission!
The fact that there is a ton of UFOs appearing, drifting in all directions, shooting by, etc., and according to Jim they're all the result of thrusters! And, oh yeah, whether it's night or day. It seems he can't tell the difference and he needs guidance from others.
Originally posted by secretnasaman
This was the Russian camera feed as the NASA feed had a loss of signal, We hear NASA then inform the shuttle that the KU Band is back broadcasting...after this Russian sighting.
...This also demonstrates that the Russian communications satellite is better & does not loose signal when NASA does. (as is the case with the Russian control room shot of Mir vs the NASA "feed" video of the same STS-63 mission)