It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stander
There is nothing much I can do here. You guys will continue to blatantly lie, the Goebels style, about GM filing for bankruptcy and Obama wrestling the case away from the bankruptcy judge to preside over the ways things get settled whereby violating each and every amandement in the Bill of Rights.
www.bloomberg.com...
“There’s an enormous momentum in favor of the government plan,” says Jay Westbrook, who teaches bankruptcy law at the University of Texas.
It’s naïve to assume bankruptcy judges feel compelled to follow the law, says LoPucki.
He argues that bankruptcy courts across the country compete for the big cases by giving lawyers for major companies what they want.
“According to the law, this plan should not be approved,” LoPucki says.
Yet he predicts Gonzalez will do it anyway to persuade other companies (General Motors Corp. comes to mind) to pick Manhattan’s bankruptcy court over, say Detroit’s.
Already the Chrysler case is one for the books. You have the federal government sending a company into bankruptcy court, financing its reorganization, deciding who will get what, setting a strict timetable and urging a judge to blink at the law.
Originally posted by finemanm
reply to post by stander
Dude, you are citing to Bloomberg News to contradict what I am saying. Did you even read the article that I cited to show you that this is ILLEGAL?
My article is also from Bloomberg News. If that source is good enough for you, then why are you just discounting my argument that this is illegal.
Here is more from the article that I cite to:
www.bloomberg.com...
“There’s an enormous momentum in favor of the government plan,” says Jay Westbrook, who teaches bankruptcy law at the University of Texas.
It’s naïve to assume bankruptcy judges feel compelled to follow the law, says LoPucki.
He argues that bankruptcy courts across the country compete for the big cases by giving lawyers for major companies what they want.
“According to the law, this plan should not be approved,” LoPucki says.
Yet he predicts Gonzalez will do it anyway to persuade other companies (General Motors Corp. comes to mind) to pick Manhattan’s bankruptcy court over, say Detroit’s.
Already the Chrysler case is one for the books. You have the federal government sending a company into bankruptcy court, financing its reorganization, deciding who will get what, setting a strict timetable and urging a judge to blink at the law.
Originally posted by RolandBrichter
I've already provided the Supreme Court precedence in an earlier post that plainly states that the government's rip off of the Chrysler bondholders is in violation of their 5th amendment rights....and that if the government tries it again with GM....there will be hell to pay....Stander wanted to hear none of it...
Geoffrey Gwin, principal of the Group G Capital Partners LLC hedge funds, said that after weighing the obstacles ahead and along with the opposition they had faced before, the group's five remaining members realized that they couldn't mount an effective legal challenge.
But that doesn't mean that the deal reached before Chrysler's Chapter 11 filing _ which would exchange the automaker's total of $6.9 billion in secured debt for $2 billion _ has the group's support.
"We're still opposing this and not signing the consents, but the active fight has been more challenging," Gwin said.
Thomas Lauria, the group's lead attorney, said in a statement that the lenders he represented, and others, felt undue pressure from President Barack Obama's administration to accept the deal.
The group eventually came to the conclusion that there wasn't enough of them to "withstand the enormous pressure and machinery of the U.S. government," he said.
In addressing Chrysler's Chapter 11 filing last week, Obama said the lenders were seeking an "unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout" after Chrysler and his auto task force cleared the company's other hurdles, including the Fiat deal and a cost-cutting pact that the United Auto Workers ratified last week.
Three of Chrysler's secured creditors have asked a New York court to halt the carmaker's Chapter 11 restructuring on the grounds that it violates their legal rights and the government's authority under the troubled assets relief programme.
The three - all Indiana state pension funds - are among a group of 46 creditors that had appeared to back away this month from efforts to derail the process under which a "new" Chrysler would emerge from bankruptcy protection by July 1. The new entity would be owned by a union healthcare trust, the US government and Italy's Fiat.
Echoing unease at the strong-arm tactics by Washington to speed the restructuring through bankruptcy court, the funds said "the Treasury department has taken constructive possession of Chrysler and is requiring it to adopt a sale plan in bankruptcy that violates the most fundamental principles of creditor rights - that first-tier secured creditors have absolute priority".
Source
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Chrysler LLC will not repay U.S. taxpayers more than $7 billion in bailout money it received earlier this year and as part of its bankruptcy filing.
This revelation was buried within Chrysler's bankruptcy filings last week and confirmed by the Obama administration Tuesday. The filings included a list of business assumptions from one of the company's key financial advisors in the bankruptcy case.
Some of the main assumptions listed by Robert Manzo of Capstone Advisory Group were that the Treasury would forgive a $4 billion bridge loan given to Chrysler in the closing days of the Bush administration, a $300 million fee on that loan, and the $3.2 billion in financing approved last week by the Obama administration to fund Chrysler's operations during bankruptcy.
Source
In addition, the government would extend a credit line to the new company and forgive the bulk of the $15.4 billion in emergency loans that the U.S. has already provided to GM, the source said.
Originally posted by finemanm
reply to post by stander
Just because Obama said that they want an unjustified bailout does not make it true.
"A group of investment firms and hedge funds decided to hold out for the prospect of an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout," Obama said.
"They were hoping that everybody else would make sacrifices and they would have to make none," he said. "I don't stand with them."
The dissident bondholders, whose ranks have dwindled since the proceedings began, contend that either another buyer challenging Italy's Fiat /quotes/comstock/23g!f (IT:F 7.81, -0.02, -0.19%) or even a liquidation could give the stakeholders a better deal.
Federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Arthur Gonzalez, however, overruled the group, which also complained that the case was moving too quickly and that the U.S. government was leaning too heavily on the process.
President Barack Obama slammed the holdouts, which includes some hedge funds, calling them "speculators" when he unveiled the proposed bankruptcy plan last week.
Gonzalez ordered that the lenders be identified midday Wednesday despite the group's request to remain anonymous in light of death threats received by some members.