Originally posted by TurkeyBurgers
"Most people want proove of the human and ape missing link because there is a missing link. And because humans and apes walk the planet to this day
where is the in between?? Its a flaw in darwins theory of our evolution."
Well I can help give you some clues to that as well. Here is a page from a website that shows MANY different transitional fossil skulls between apes
and man. I do not know if this is what you are looking for just trying to help.
www.talkorigins.org...
That website talkorigins is really cool.
Here is a link to the Frequently Asked Questions that is awesome and helped me a great deal. I hope it helps you find some answers to questions you
might have.
www.talkorigins.org...
aaah yes the old chimpanzee, skulls and many "doctored" skulls of Australopithecus aficanus or "Lucy in desguise with diamonds" LSD hallucination
that another pathetic pile of piltdown propaganda passed off as fact back when it was first discovered and artisans would create entire skulls from a
tooth or bodies from a monkey skull. Kids still believe this stuff years and years after it has been debunked because Darwinists NEVER get around to
removing the JUNK they believe is science. In Fact Most of us can walk into the halls of modern public school system biology class and find ernst
haekles tweaked fraudulent embryo drawiings in the text books and then we have their spin on DNA that I remember lurking on this wensite years ago
when all the darwinists were sweeping DNA's digital code under the rug calling it nothing important just a simple molecule is all move along nothing
to see here. Or when they were always giving excuses for how hard it is for a fossil to become a fossil and why there were so few transitional
fossils. Then one day someone in the darwinist community came up with the idea that ALL fossils are transitional when the fossil record shows stasis.
I have heard the mechanism for sexual selection then, later it was "punctuated equilibrium" then it was random mutation and natural selection or
what we have always known as adaptation with variation. I remember when creationists used to explain how the domestic dog proved that evolution
doesn't take millions of years and evo's would ridicule them as only breeds of dogs and not evolution.
Then I watched them steal that same example for dogs to justify an explanation for punctuated equilibrium calling all the varietys of dog, "species"
when it was ridiculed for calling it that by creationists.
Obfusating the vernacular of this particular area of science is what darwinists do and the evolution industry is in the midst of yet another re-vamp
of the entire evolution story and this time stealing from the ID people the same concepts and ideas they ridiculed as NOT science back when they with
the help of the ACLU and PBS bastardized the dover VS kitzmiller trial on television.
The science of Darwinian evolution is on its deathbed and has kept medicince in the stoneage having become exactly what they accused creationsist of
attempting to do to science. They have in fact become the antithesis of science and turned it into a religion . To even question it is blaspheme and
they defend it with all the pomp and zeal of a hell fire and brimstone baptist preacher looking as ridiculous as the landover baptist.
No wonder our science scores have dropped so far back. It is because we are still looking for silly missing links to satisfy the idiotic need to say
to creationists, "see I told you we came from apes" as if they actually WANT to be primates so much, everything they discover is an addition to that
proverbial mountain of BS they call " evidence"
