Those are pretty harsh words for a kid, don't you think?
I'm not going to jump on any bandwagons here, and I really don't care
whether or not the Pentagon has missile launchers on the immediate
property.
My question is: were is the definitive proof to show either way?
I haven't seen anything proving for, or against.
We do know there are several military bases within minutes of the Pentagon
that have fighter jets and apparently, surface to air missiles on tap.
Why wouldn't the center of military planning have some sort of defence
mechanism to protect its interests?
I mean, the Pentacon must have something more than 82 cameras
that can't even pick up a big a$s commerical airliner, huh?