It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It's Official: Bush Admin Saw Iraq As Religious War

page: 2
6
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 18 2009 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by jd140
Personlized cover sheets.

Who cares?

Only those who are running out of new things to hate the last administration for.


Actually, they're trying to deflect everyone's attention away from their Speaker Pelosi calling the CIA liers.




posted on May, 18 2009 @ 06:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by jerico65

Originally posted by drwizardphd
I just want the bastards who threw us into an illegal war because of religious extremism to own up to their crimes.


Well, shuck-a-rooties, I always thought it was a "War for Oil"? Now it's "religious extremism". Could everyone please get on the same HateTrain?

I think alot of people need to take the high horse they are riding and put it back in the barn.


Good catch.

Notice the (somewhat) subtle shift in tactics by the left - even if they say they aren't the left? Huffington Post? Right ... They couldn't get any traction using the "war for oil" card, so um, let's try the "war for religious extremism" card.

And get a clue if anyone thinks a bunch of show trials spread over the next several years would "heal the country". The true result would be a paralysis that would destroy obama's last (minuscule) chance to accomplish anything with the 4 years he'll be allowed.


[edit on 5/18/2009 by centurion1211]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 06:57 PM
link   
reply to post by centurion1211
 


You said :
And get a clue if anyone thinks a bunch of show trials spread over the next several years would "heal the country".

Fergetabout a bunch of show-trials !

Howabout bringing a bunch of slimeball criminals to justice ?

Or does that make too much sense ?



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 07:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by jd140
Who cares?
Only those who are running out of new things to hate the last administration for.



Originally posted by Retseh
Who cares.
This is all fast becoming ancient history.
Liberals need to get over this, we could still be prosecuting Clinton for attempted rape, but what's the point, no one cares any more.



[snip: Personal attack Removed]

THIS Ancient history is the biggest foreign policy blunder in the United States history. It cost almost 5000 of your own men their lives, it destroyed Iraq and it made your corporate leaders billions

Your so willing to forgive and forget how they turned your nation into the most hated and corrupt nation on the planet? How they stole your government, attacked your own people, then lied and blamed someone else? Are you just stupidly blind? or ignorant.

At least the French executed people like you in the streets, sadly, it seems you get quite a following on sites like this.

The only thing Americans should be trying to forget, is how many of them stuck there heads in the sand and hid, when they needed to show some balls!




[edit on 18-5-2009 by Agit8dChop]

Mod Edit: Civility and Decorum are Required

[edit on 5-18-2009 by worldwatcher]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   
I can't believe people are still saying "Who cares?"

They must not have loved ones in Iraq right now. They must not understand the value of human life. I'm guessing these people think death and destruction is just something to read about in the news on a boring day at the office.

Complacence should have been labeled the eight deadly sin in the Bible. It does more harm to mankind than all the other sins combined.

"Ancient History" my hairy butt crack. The Bush Administration will be ancient history when the troops are home, the economy is restored, and our standing on the world stage is back to where it was!



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 07:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
THIS Ancient history is the biggest foreign policy blunder in the United States history.


Your opinion. I think one of the biggest blunders was not slapping down Iran when they overran the embassy, but that's neither here nor there.


Originally posted by Agit8dChop
At least the French executed people like you in the streets, sadly, it seems you get quite a following on sites like this.


"Executed people like you"? Sweet, calling for the death of someone posting on a stupid forum? That's rich.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by mattifikation
I can't believe people are still saying "Who cares?"

They must not have loved ones in Iraq right now. They must not understand the value of human life.


You ever been there, or just bringing up that, "Don't you care about the troops" angle because it's useful at this time?

And I'll save you some typing. Yes, I've been there, yes, I care about human life, and yes, I've killed the enemy. And I really don't give a flying f**k what is on a cover sheet, or the fact some pogue on Huffington Post got some sand in their shorts over this.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 07:47 PM
link   

"Executed people like you"? Sweet, calling for the death of someone posting on a stupid forum? That's rich.


No, executing people who are willing to collaborate with the enemy.

Your telling me 'so what / who cares ' to the biggest criminal take over of the United States.

you deserve a traitors fate.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 07:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
No, executing people who are willing to collaborate with the enemy.

Your telling me 'so what / who cares ' to the biggest criminal take over of the United States.


Did you actually read any of the posts? I'm saying, "Who cares" to what's on a bunch over cover sheets.


Originally posted by Agit8dChop
you deserve a traitors fate.


Well, you know I'll be losing sleep over that. And if you're feeling froggy, jump. I bet you'll find out you're not as hard as you wish you were.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 08:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Agit8dChop
 


Star on both your posts! And imo this transcends borders and nations.It is traitorous to humanity and the values in which we base ourselves as *civilized* smoke and mirrors,and i bet you will find millions of people that think like that all over the western world.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 08:11 PM
link   
reply to post by jerico65
 


You said :
And I really don't give a flying f**k what is on a cover sheet, or the fact some pogue on Huffington Post got some sand in their shorts over this.



Pogue

Pogue is an offensive military slang term used to describe non-infantry, non-combat soldiers, staff, and other rear-echelon or support units. It has been used in the United States Navy and Marine Corps since before World War II, entering Army usage around the time of the Vietnam War. A related term is the acronym REMF, or "rear-echelon mother #er".

The term may be derived from a Tagalog word meaning "prostitute". Originally, the term was a sexual insult, as "pogue" was slang for a young male who submitted to sexual advances. This led to the related term "pogey bait", meaning candy or sweets.

Source : Wikipedia



Jon Soltz - Bio

Co-Founder and Chair of VoteVets.org, is a leader of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans community and is originally from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. From May to September 2003, Soltz served as a Captain during Operation Iraqi Freedom, deploying logistics convoys with the 1st Armored Division. During 2005, Soltz was mobilized for 365 days at Fort Dix New Jersey, training soldiers for combat in Afghanistan and Iraq. He also served his country with distinction in the Kosovo Campaign as a Tank Platoon Leader between June and December 2000. Soltz is a graduate of Washington & Jefferson College with dual degree in Political Science and History. He has completed graduate work at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.

Jon Soltz has quickly become one of the most authoritative voices on veterans issues and military issues. He has been interviewed by national outlets such as the Associated Press, Washington Post, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, TIME, Newsweek, among others, and in dozens of local outlets.

Source : Huffington Post

There's something really elitist about your attitude.

Like since you made the choice to go ever there and 'serve' you are somehow more entitled to call yourself a patriot than someone who is a mere civilian ...

Shame on you, sir !



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 08:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by visible_villain
There's something really elitist about your attitude.

Like since you made the choice to go ever there and 'serve' you are somehow more entitled to call yourself a patriot than someone who is a mere civilian ...

Shame on you, sir !


And your point is????

I fight so civilians don't have to. As someone once said, "They have the right to their opinion and I have the right to bust them in the mouth if I don't agree with it." A little over the top, but funny.

Wasn't this thread about some stupid cover sheets?



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 08:50 PM
link   
reply to post by jerico65
 


Yes because if we didn't invade Iraq Americans would be on the streets right now fighting Saddams republican guard.I have respect for soldiers who fight battles to defend their country and way of life from tryants.Except right now the boot is on the other foot and the only tyrants right now are America and the UK.Thats just a fact.We are the aggressors,the tyrants,the murderers and the scum of the earth.Lie to yourself all you like,there is nothing just about this,nothing patriotic.Its barbarism.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 08:54 PM
link   
reply to post by jerico65
 


It's a thread about religious idiocy finding its way into military policy. It's about how people like you and your Bushy are no better than the diaper headed freaks running around screaming about killing infidels.

It's about your mouth asking "who cares" when obviously, quite a few people care. We get it. You don't care. Frankly, I think you're lying and you do care. Otherwise you'd go away and let those of us who do care actually discuss the issue.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Solomons
We are the aggressors,the tyrants,the murderers and the scum of the earth.Lie to yourself all you like,there is nothing just about this,nothing patriotic.Its barbarism.


Murderers and scum of the earth. Well, I've been called worse things by better people......


And your rant has what do to with the topic at hand? Those coversheets??



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 08:59 PM
link   
reply to post by jerico65
 


No,not just you,me and every person in the both countries who didnt do more to stop it from happening in the first place and prevent the blood bath.But your right,we are going off topic.Apologies to the OP.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 09:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by mattifikation
It's a thread about religious idiocy finding its way into military policy. It's about how people like you and your Bushy are no better than the diaper headed freaks running around screaming about killing infidels.


Were you ever in the military? Playing Call to Duty doesn't count.

Coversheets like the ones shown are used during briefings. I've seen quotes from Sun Tzu, The Bible, The Koran, Von Clauswitz, Patton, Rommel, you name it. It's not policy.

And no matter how many times you write it, US and Coalition forces aren't the same as the "diaper headed freaks" you mentioned. (Diaper-headed freaks? That's a bit elitist and bigoted, isn't it?)


Originally posted by mattifikation
It's about your mouth asking "who cares" when obviously, quite a few people care. We get it. You don't care. Frankly, I think you're lying and you do care. Otherwise you'd go away and let those of us who do care actually discuss the issue.


I don't care what was written on the coversheets, but I do care that people that don't have Clue One about a military briefing getting the wrong ideas.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 09:03 PM
link   
reply to post by jerico65
 


Wasn't this thread about some stupid cover sheets?

IMHO this thread is about yet more evidence of a continuing criminal enterprise operating out of Washington which has so far successfully camoflaged their nefarious objectives and activities behind the smokescreen of religious moral justification, using, in this instance, verbatim quotes from the Bible on official briefing documents ...

It boggles the mind, plain and simple ...



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 09:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Solomons
 


... we are going off topic.Apologies to the OP.

Wow !

Nonbody's ever apologized to me before ...

Usually I just get slammed, double-flamed, but usually only just ignored ...

Thanks !




posted on May, 18 2009 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by visible_villain
IMHO this thread is about yet more evidence of a continuing criminal enterprise operating out of Washington which has so far successfully camoflaged their nefarious objectives and activities behind the smokescreen of religious moral justification, using, in this instance, verbatim quotes from the Bible on official briefing documents ...

It boggles the mind, plain and simple ...


Sorry your mind got so boggled over a few phrases on a coversheet.

What if it were a quote by Rommel? Or Napoleon? Or Giap?




top topics



 
6
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join