It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Again, isn't that what many people, [probably even yourself did] do when they decide to belive something--they look at and rely on the works of others more knowledgable then themselves?
More than that crazy "goo to you" belief. But, our sources "don't count" from every anti-Christian thread I've seen on this site.
Miracles aren’t a grab-bag of goodies for us to enjoy; rather, God uses miracles in particular points of time for very specific purposes. God doesn't need to prove Himself to us (we’re on trial, not Him), nor does He “need” to bless us. When He does bless us, it is entirely out of mercy.
God has done greater works than restoring limbs. If He created the entire universe out of nothing, spoke all plants and animals into existence, sculpted and breathed life into the first two humans, and raised His Son from death, it is clear that He has the power to heal amputees if and when it is His will.
If there is no God, why should we care if people have lost limbs? To borrow from C. S. Lewis, in a truly godless world, amputations wouldn’t be “good” or “bad”; they would simply be, a fact of life no different from a tree shedding leaves. Attacking theism on a moral basis undermines the argument.
You qualify your own question with “[e]xcept the ear that Jesus put it back.” You may as well ask, “If God is all-powerful, why did He never part the Red Sea—except for that one time in Exodus?”1 And not only is your argument qualified; it is also, essentially, an argument from silence. Even if the Bible doesn’t record the healing of an amputee, that doesn’t mean God never has.
So far we have conceded your point that, other than the scene in Luke 22, “never, ever in all Bible was a case of an amputation healed.” But is this so? First, it may be that there was no biblical Hebrew, Greek, or Aramaic word for “amputee”2; it is possible that some passages referring to individuals as “lame” or “crippled” (Matthew 15:30, 21:14; John 5:2–9a) are actually referring to those who had lost limbs. Besides, how is healing a totally useless limb any less miraculous than restoring an amputated limb? Second, because of the nature of leprosy, the healings of lepers in the Bible actually does imply the restoration of some body parts, such as fingers
1. "Positive Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer in a Coronary Care Unit Population"
MethodsCardiac patients from the San Francisco General Medical Center were randomly divided (using a computer-generated list) into two groups. The names of the patients in the "test" group were given to a group of Christians, who prayed for them while they were in the hospital. The intercessory prayer team members were chosen on the following basis:
Born again Christians on the basis of John 3:35
Led an active Christian life on the basis of
daily devotional prayer
fellowship in a local Christian church
The "placebo" group received no prayer. Neither the "test" nor the "placebo" group of patients knew if they were receiving prayer. Likewise, the hospital staff, doctors, or nurses were "blinded" since they did not know which patient belonged to which group.
ResultsStatistics were acquired from the prayer and placebo groups both before and after prayer, until the patients were discharged from the hospital. There were no statistical differences between the placebo and the prayer groups before prayer was initiated. The results demonstrated that patients who were prayed for suffered "less congestive heart failure, required less diuretic and antibiotic therapy, had fewer episodes of pneumonia, had fewer cardiac arrests, and were less frequently intubated and ventilated." Statistics demonstrated the the prayer group had a statistically significantly lower severity score based upon the hospital course after entry (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis of all the parameters measured demonstrated that the outcomes of the two groups were even more statistically significant (p < 0.0001). In science, the standard level of significance is when a "p value" is less than 0.05. A value of 0.01 means that the likelihood the result is because of chance is one in 100. A p value of 0.0001 indicates that in only one study out of 10,000 is the result likely to be due to chance. Table 2 from the study is reproduced below. The remarkable thing which one notices is that nearly every parameter measured is affected by prayer, although individually many categories do not reach the level of statistical significance due to sample size. However, multivariate analysis, which compares all parameters together produces a level of significance seldom reached in any scientific study (p < 0.0001). The author points out that the method used in this study does not produce the maximum effect of prayer, since the study could not control for the effect of outside prayer (i.e., it is likely many of the placebo group were prayed for by persons outside of the study). It is likely that a study which used only atheists (who had no Christian family or friends) would produce an even more dramatic result. However, since atheists make up only 1-2% of the population, it would be difficult to obtain a large enough sample size.
ex]
source: www.godandscience.org...
Moo, your question about healing amputees has faulty logic and some sketchy assumptions… Moo you are assuming God has never healed an amputee. Who is to say that in the history of the world, God has never caused a limb to regenerate? It’s a conclusion that simply cannot be drawn my friend…
Moo you are assuming God still performs miracles today just as He did in the past.
.8 He gave this power to His disciples and those who follow Him.9
.Does God’s goodness and love really require Him to heal everyone? NO! Illness, suffering, and pain are the result of our living in a cursed world—cursed because of our sin…
Moo you are assuming by your question that God is bound to say "yes" to any prayer offered in faith.
moo,you are assuming God does not exist. This is the underlying assumption on which the whole "why won’t God heal amputees" argument you trumpet. It is an attempt by you to have a “gotcha” moment, huh? Read this for more insight…
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by moocowman
Moo, I believe you need calibration....
Salvation is easy!!!!!
Knowing an infinite God is complicated...
OT
Originally posted by moocowman
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by moocowman
Moo, I believe you need calibration....
Salvation is easy!!!!!
Knowing an infinite God is complicated...
OT
Amazing isn't it, not only does the creator of all that there is create something to be saved from to begin with but then makes it really difficult and complicated to understand what the hell it's trying to say.
You know what's very sad OT ? that my morals are higher than Yahwehs
So then each one of us will give an account of himself to God. Romans 14:12
Originally posted by moocowman
God answers prayers with yes/no/later, do you agree or disagree OT simple yes or no please.
'Yes', 'No' and 'Wait'. That is how God answers prayers. You have probably heard this a thousand times, and you believe it completely.
'Yes', 'No' and 'Wait' may sound comforting, but here is the thing that I would like to help you understand.
'Yes', 'No' and 'Wait' is actually an optical illusion.
Let me show you how this illusion works. Imagine that I put a jug of milk on the counter, and I say to you, "Pray to the jug of milk." I tell you that if you pray to the jug of milk, it will answer all your prayers. You are skeptical, but you agree to try it. You pray to the jug of milk to give you 1,000.
Now I say to you, "The jug of milk answers prayers in the form of 'yes', 'no' and 'wait'. Let's see what happens."
What is going to happen? There are three scenarios:
Scenario 1: Out of the blue, a check for $1,100 arrives in the mail tomorrow. It is an unexpected tax refund check from the IRS. I say to you, "See! The jug of milk answered your prayer!"
Scenario 2: Seven weeks later, out of the blue, you get a cost-of-living raise and it happens to increase your salary by $1,200 per year. I say to you, "See! The jug of milk answered your prayer! You just had to wait patiently."
Scenario 3: Nothing happens for six months. You ask me, "Why?" I say, "We have to trust that the milk jug knows what’s best. Let's be patient."
link: whywontgodhealamputees.com...
Originally posted by OldThinker
My savior is not pushy, he's a gentlemen...don't ignore his promptings, please?
OT
Yes...simply. You're thinking for yourself in asking here, huh? You wouldn't be parroting MILK...?????
moo, you do not want to hear this...there have been experiences in your life that have influenced you and influenced your 'disbelief' system...do some introspection...ok?
My savior is not pushy, he's a gentlemen...don't ignore his promptings, please?
But as a internet friend, please be careful, there, ok? So then each one of us will give an account of himself to God. Romans 14:12
So disease is not caused by demons as claimed by many xtians, ?