It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Biden Caught Off Guard by 911 Conspiracy Theorists

page: 1
11
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 18 2009 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Well this guy put the question about as direct as anyone could to Biden....and his answer was a one word answer. I am still not sure if they plan to do anything at all...if I was a betting man I would not give it very good odds based on this video. The part that I found interesting was Bidens face change when he was presented with the question.

www.liveleak.com...




posted on May, 18 2009 @ 12:49 PM
link   
As if biden had a clue...as if Obama or Bush have a clue,his daddy probably did.Presidents and VP's are only around for 8 years max,the real movers and shakers have been doing this for decades and are not some revolving bunch of idiots that get voted in and out.

[edit on 18-5-2009 by Solomons]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 12:51 PM
link   
Thought I would post it here as well for anyone who does not like going thru links.



Let me know what you think of his reaction.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 12:53 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptGizmo
 


It was a very interesting reaction. At least he didn't blow the guy off completely. He actually looked at the document but I believe the biggest issue is with the image of the guy that presented it.

I hate to say this but he was unshaven with long hair. Kind of hippyish. That right there will probably set most people off to actually listening to anything he has to say.

Biden actually blew him off in a nicer way than say Rudy would have.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 12:58 PM
link   
was slightly off topic... more appropriate for another thread.

[edit on 18-5-2009 by DohBama]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 12:58 PM
link   
A really good video...a terrible response.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:02 PM
link   
I would have blown him off too.

He pretty much said if you don't investigate then you are untrutsworthy.

As much as I don't like Bidens politics, he is almost a regular down to earth guy. You come at that type of person like that and you are going to get 1 of 2 reactions.

1. The one we saw there.

or

2. A punch in the mouth.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:10 PM
link   
the one word response is interesting.

What is more interesting is that he got the hell out of there and had his guard block the reporter from advancing for further clarification.

I would interpret the answer as yes to the compound question in it's entirety.

Running away has been the norm as is nonresponsive answers from top cabinet employees and of course regulators.

Run biden run...

typo

[edit on 18-5-2009 by imd12c4funn]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:12 PM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 


That is still no excuse to blow off a topic such as this. It's a very damning report to the 9/11 commission and official government stance on the events. How should this guy have come at Biden in the 15 seconds he gets to ask a question?



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Well good on the guy for asking the question that we all would love to have asked ourselves.

I think Bidens response was cool and to the point.
What did the guy think Biden was going to say when he put him on the spot like that? It's not something he can commit to on the fly.

But it was entertaining to watch!





[edit on 18-5-2009 by Flighty]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by ExPostFacto
 


Not dance around it. That is how he should have approached him.

If that is the question he wanted to ask, then he should have just asked it. Not act like he had a question about the economy and blindside him with a crazy 9/11 question.

I don't know how damning this report is, but apparently Biden hasn't read it. Is it fair to ask someone a question based on that report when they haven't read it?


Of course the truthers will see this as a sign that the US really did blow up the buildings.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:48 PM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 


The report says an estimated 10 tons of nano thermite (that hadn't even been developed yet, and wasn't developed yet until a year later in a USA labratory) was in the dust particles of the WTC.

In all fairness, I see where you are coming from that he should have just asked him about the report and the allegations it makes. However, in the reporters defense, he was leading softly to the main question as to not sound as you said a crazy 9/11 conspiracy theorist.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:49 PM
link   
So, I saw disgust on his face when Biden looked at the paper.

No surprise, no amusement, no curiosity. Just disgust. Which tells me one of two possibilities: Biden is simply disgusted at the thought that the perpetrators might actually have been US agents, or he is disgusted at having to lie yet again to carry on the coverup. It's pretty hard to know which based on the video.

And the quick "yes" (you can trust us!) was a little TOO quick. Something still doesn't sit right with me regarding the events of that day and the days following.

Nice vid, thanks for the post!



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:52 PM
link   
Really, I thoroughly dislike the idea that appearances matter; but they do. The long-haired, bearded reporter is probably an intelligent, critically-thinking man, but one look at him and many people see a guy who's so wrapped up in conspiracy theories that he doesn't have time for a shave and a haircut, especially when you stand him side by side with the other reporters there.

I have to put on a "costume" every single day when I go to work so that I look "appropriate" for my environment. It blows, as I could do my job in jeans and a t-shirt and get the same results for the most part.

Biden's response reminds me of that question he was asked during the campaign about being able to keep a handle on his loose lips. He responded with a "Yes." I don't think there was much more that he could say without getting into trouble...



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 01:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by jd140
 


The report says an estimated 10 tons of nano thermite (that hadn't even been developed yet, and wasn't developed yet until a year later in a USA labratory) was in the dust particles of the WTC.

In all fairness, I see where you are coming from that he should have just asked him about the report and the allegations it makes. However, in the reporters defense, he was leading softly to the main question as to not sound as you said a crazy 9/11 conspiracy theorist.


The way he put the question is what I have an issue with. He gave him an ultimatium in the form of a question.

If these nano thermite things hadn't been developed until a year later, how do you purpose they got there?

Hard to get 10 tons of something that doesn't exist.

Wasn't it not to long ago people were claiming thermal nitrate was what brought the towers down?

What will it be in another 6 months, Langoliers?



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 


That is the question posed by the scientist. How undiscovered types of thermite were found in dust...




posted on May, 18 2009 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptGizmo
 


Well, I have a few things to say about this video.

He wasn't tackled immediately by Vice-President Joe Biden's Secret Service detail, is amazing.


That he got the whole question out without being harrassed by the same said detail, is even just as amazing.

The source of the video is a website I have never seen, but why do they have pornography as a source of revenue for their website? That's sure to give them issues as to their validity in getting non-conspiracy theorist supporters.

All of these people who do not believe the official version of events are doing things right by peacefully trying to get answers and stirring up controversy, but I'm still curious why no one has collected all of their information and gone to the International Criminal Court which is where you go to prosecute people for Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and as well War Crimes.

The events of September 11th, no matter the perpetrator, would fall under War Crimes.

It would not take much to register a Non-Profit Organization, a 501 (c) is exempt from taxes, and having a fundraiser selling Political Bumper Stickers would be an excellent way to raise funding as well as awareness of it.


[edit on 18-5-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by ExPostFacto
 


Doesn't seem like a possible thing does it.

If they weren't discovered then they couldn't have been there. Which leans me towards the study being a lie.

Unless somebody invented time travel.

If thats the case I want to go back to November 5, 1955.



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 05:50 PM
link   
Unfortunately the interviewer made a mistake that people who finally get big time air time (which is what a conversation with the VP is) often make. He asked two questions.

Are you going to open a criminal investigation of how nano-thermate got into the WTC dust? (I know, not the exact words, but a tough question.)

And then, he made his big mistake. He gave the VP his escape route by asking question number two.

"Can the American people trust you if you don't open this criminal investigation?" (Not the exact words, but a dumb question that let the VP seem like a nice but busy guy who does what everybody does, answers the last question he hears, "Yes!", and hits the road.)

Words to the wise. If you ever get into that spot. Ask one and only one question and make it a zinger!


[edit on 18-5-2009 by ipsedixit]



posted on May, 18 2009 @ 06:02 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptGizmo
 


Interesting the one paragraph at your link says "9/11 nut" - the press constantly puts out anyone who believes 9/11 was an inside job is labeled a "nut".

Edit to say S and F for you my friend!

[edit on 18-5-2009 by questioningall]



new topics

top topics



 
11
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join