It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The UK Independence party rather than the BNP appears to be the main beneficiary of public disillusionment with the political elite, according to polling this week.
The leadership: 75%. Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain. The Party founded Common Purpose in 1970, and created the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in 1992 as a honey trap to neutralise activists.
Reading the Election Results Round-up in last May's Voice of Freedom [BNP publication], it is instructive to see where many of these UKIP candidates chose to stand. In most cases they are precisely in those wards where the BNP was expected to do well. For example, in Dudley Gornal Ward UKIP's intervention cost us the seat - if their 477 votes were added to our 1,170, we would have defeated the winning Tory candidate. Likewise, in Dudley St James where if the UKIP 426 was added to the BNP's 743 votes we would have romped home against the winning Labour candidate. UKIP fielded two more candidates in Dudley in strong BNP wards. Thankfully the BNP juggernaut was just too strong for the ploy to work, but in Parsloes ward Labour came within two votes of defeating us, thanks to a UKIP candidate picking up 423 votes.
[...]
The government's intention is clearly that voters will choose UKIP as a more 'acceptable' expression of protest, avoiding the vilification heaped on BNP supporters.
[...]
Creating a bogus and emasculated 'protest' vehicle like UKIP is the oldest trick in the book even the Cazrist Russians used it to some effect. It is essential we don't let our own government fool the public in this way.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
I have spoken to a few UKIP officials in the leadership committee and they are well meaning patriots and welcoming of all races in their organisation.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Unfortunately the BNP is not a nationalist organisation but a racist and fascist party.
Originally posted by infinite
the British public do not want a party with Afrikaner racialist views governing the Kingdom.
Originally posted by infinite
I mean, why vote for a party whose leader, today, claimed a victory cross honour was only given to a solider because he was black completely forgetting the heroic action he took.
The BNP has never claimed that Mr Beharry “only got a VC because he was black” as the lying headline smears allege - and which can easily be refuted by simply reading the original article. We described the bravery of Johnson Beharry as “routine” in the context of the countless examples of the similar bravery of the men with whom he served and also fought alongside.
Originally posted by blupblup
The BNP are an absolute disgrace to this country....as are it's supporters.
They should be booted out.....
Originally posted by blupblup
The BNP are an absolute disgrace to this country....as are it's supporters.
Labour : 9.99% (345)
Conservative : 29.42% (1016)
Liberal Democrat : 13.17% (455)
Green : 2.46% (85)
BNP : 38.30% (1323)
UKIP : 3.50% (121)
Other : 3.16% (109)
Originally posted by Solomons
As for meinkampf...funny you mention it because mein kampf was the book that made me question the things i had been taught at school.
Originally posted by infinite
How many times were you allowed to vote? Was it a typical open poll, that allows someone to vote numerous times. You cannot tell.
Originally posted by infinite
Cythraul, you're a smart person. Do not believe the so-called "PC attitude" towards a Black solider who risked his own life to save others. If the gentlemen in question was white, I'd doubt Nick Griffin would question the awarding of the medal.
So, stop telling people who NOT to vote for!
Instead, find someone who we SHOULD vote for.