It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by awake_awoke
Or;
Maybe Steele should consider that businesses that offer domestic partnership/marriage benefits to all will end up being more sucessful because they do not disenfranchize the best workers, gay or not. The free market will decide; and I guarantee those that offer equal rights for their workers will prosper-no matter the size of the company.
Please don't say conservatives. This is how Neo-cons do things.
Once again...did not mean to offend you.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Now, I have a question: Does anyone think that health insurance for same-sex couples will cost more than for heterosexual married couples, since the risks of AIDS/HIV are higher for gays?
Originally posted by maria_stardust
Originally posted by jsobecky
Now, I have a question: Does anyone think that health insurance for same-sex couples will cost more than for heterosexual married couples, since the risks of AIDS/HIV are higher for gays?
So, by your logic, only spouses of heterosexual married couples who contract AIDS/HIV should be allowed to have their treatments covered by health insurance.
Do you happen to deem spouses of heterosexual couples more worthy of health insurance benefits?
Interesting...
Especially since we all know that only homosexuals are capable to contracting sexually transmitted diseases.