Who 'controls' Stephen Hawkings thoughts?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 03:16 AM by donttaserme
reply to post by The Change



i saw this on south park .. its totally sadam he is behind the curtain isnt he?
even though south park is a smut kinda cartoon there is always that ring of truth to some episodes .. hmmm


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 03:46 AM by symmetricAvenger
reply to post by The Change



lol the wizzard is ; )

well you did ask so im just saying just saying ; )


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 04:01 AM by KRISKALI777
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss



Stephen Hawkings is actually modelled on that puppet fron the SAW movies- you know the one on the trycycle; only difference- the wheelchair.
Just as Jigsaw controlled this robot- Green evil reptiloid Aliens are controlling Hawkings. They have removed his larynx and speak for him, via his computed voice-box



reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 04:16 AM by rachel07
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss



I wondered what speech software he was using to speak. He must have state of the art software, as he doesn't have to type anything, or use his eyes to focus on a keyboard. (You never see him blinking.) What kind of software did they give him, and did they implant something in his brain that could be picked up onto the machine on his chair? It is a very good question. I wonder if anybody knows the answer.


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 05:09 AM by space cadet
reply to post by Mindmelding



wow, what a scenario! So he could be the test subject for a project of mind controlled puppets everywhere one day?!

It is truly a valid question though, the OP started a thread that I really don't think anyone will be able to answer with all certainty, which leaves the door wide open for conspiracy. For that I gave him a star and flag!


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 05:30 AM by pop_science
reply to post by space cadet



There's many devices people use to who are disabled in that way.

This may give you some insight -

www.businessweek.com...

The device
www.words-plus.com...


One of my patients uses a device much like that there's really not much to it.


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 05:30 AM by SugarCube


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 05:35 AM by silo13
Mr. Hawking does of course.
As for *pure* thought?
He doesn't' like the American accent his voice synthesizer gives him.
That's pure enough for me.


"In 1980, we changed to a system of community and private nurses, who came in for an hour or two in the morning and evening. This lasted until I caught pneumonia in 1985. I had to have a tracheotomy operation. After this, I had to have 24 hour nursing care. This was made possible by grants from several foundations.

Before the operation, my speech had been getting more slurred, so that only a few people who knew me well, could understand me. But at least I could communicate. I wrote scientific papers by dictating to a secretary, and I gave seminars through an interpreter, who repeated my words more clearly. However, the tracheotomy operation removed my ability to speak altogether. For a time, the only way I could communicate was to spell out words letter by letter, by raising my eyebrows when someone pointed to the right letter on a spelling card. It is pretty difficult to carry on a conversation like that, let alone write a scientific paper. However, a computer expert in California, called Walt Woltosz, heard of my plight. He sent me a computer program he had written, called Equalizer. This allowed me to select words from a series of menus on the screen, by pressing a switch in my hand. The program could also be controlled by a switch, operated by head or eye movement. When I have built up what I want to say, I can send it to a speech synthesizer. At first, I just ran the Equalizer program on a desk top computer.
However David Mason, of Cambridge Adaptive Communication, fitted a small portable computer and a speech synthesizer to my wheel chair. This system allowed me to communicate much better than I could before. I can manage up to 15 words a minute. I can either speak what I have written, or save it to disk. I can then print it out, or call it back and speak it sentence by sentence. Using this system, I have written a book, and dozens of scientific papers. I have also given many scientific and popular talks. They have all been well received. I think that is in a large part due to the quality of the speech synthesiser, which is made by Speech Plus. One's voice is very important. If you have a slurred voice, people are likely to treat you as mentally deficient: Does he take sugar? This synthesiser is by far the best I have heard, because it varies the intonation, and doesn't speak like a Dalek. The only trouble is that it gives me an American accent"


... Direct quote from Stephen Hawking's website


peace


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 11:32 AM by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Wow I didnt even know if anyone would respond to this.

I was mainly talking about who gives him his 'news'. Quite a few things have changed since his decent, yet they have him commenting on things as an authority. If his mind is still sound, I dont think he'd want to comment on controversial things without actually being an authority.

Being so disabled, he cant exactly go out and scour the web and all the latest scholarly papers like you or I. Yet I've seen him commenting on AI, transhumanism type stuff and Global Warming, while he's an astrophysicist.

Dont know much about his personal life, which would help clarify who his 'CoS' is. I mean have his wives been multidiscipline science experts? The point is on these matters I find his credibility weak. If hes surrounded by a bunch of ideolouges who 'tell him what to think' (think "Consensus Science") that isnt the same as when decades ago he was in a position to actually put his hands on data and decide for himself.

Dont know much about his friends, although apparently billionaire Richard Branson of Virgin corp is going to fund his space flight or some jazz like that. That might mean something to some of you?


BTW: I'm not aware of neural implants that do what some of you thought above, but they're literally right around the corner. Existing tech's I've seen allow you to move a cursor around a computer screen and do some other fancier stuff like fly around Google Earth or control video games. All 'they' have to do is figure out how to to recognize letters being thought, and then apply predictive text like Hawkins uses to type faster or what Google now does as your typing, and then apply speech processing and you pretty much have it. This would be done by tought, not by hooking into the voice box nerves or anything like that.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nibiru Video Explains It All (Conspiracy)
  Posted 19 days ago with 8 member flags
Mark Dice calls out Alex Jones
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Any radio operator notice very sharp increase in testing the EBS
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
what I think about how bad our wolrd is.
  Posted 2 days ago with 2 member flags
Hollywood finds one more way to shove Nazis up our ... noses!
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags
The spirit of JESUS is here!
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 17 hours ago, 166 replies
AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 9 hours ago, 80 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 10 hours ago, 56 replies
war hungry Iran
  Middle East Issues, Posted 16 hours ago, 41 replies