Wow I didnt even know if anyone would respond to this.
I was mainly talking about who gives him his 'news'. Quite a few things have changed since his decent, yet they have him commenting on things as an
authority. If his mind is still sound, I dont think he'd want to comment on controversial things without actually being an authority.
Being so disabled, he cant exactly go out and scour the web and all the latest scholarly papers like you or I. Yet I've seen him commenting on AI,
transhumanism type stuff and Global Warming, while he's an astrophysicist.
Dont know much about his personal life, which would help clarify who his 'CoS' is. I mean have his wives been multidiscipline science experts? The
point is on these matters I find his credibility weak. If hes surrounded by a bunch of ideolouges who 'tell him what to think' (think "Consensus
Science") that isnt the same as when decades ago he was in a position to actually put his hands on data and decide for himself.
Dont know much about his friends, although apparently billionaire Richard Branson of Virgin corp is going to fund his space flight or some jazz like
that. That might mean something to some of you?
BTW: I'm not aware of neural implants that do what some of you thought above, but they're literally right around the corner. Existing tech's I've
seen allow you to move a cursor around a computer screen and do some other fancier stuff like fly around Google Earth or control video games. All
'they' have to do is figure out how to to recognize letters being thought, and then apply predictive text like Hawkins uses to type faster or what
Google now does as your typing, and then apply speech processing and you pretty much have it. This would be done by tought, not by hooking into the
voice box nerves or anything like that.