Judge rules family can't refuse chemo for boy

Yeha and when their kid dies because a buddist monk didnt cleanse his chakras properly im sure they would much rather have the memory of denying him treatment that could have saved his life.

They will be in pain 1000x times worse.

I think it should be up to the kid, at that age you can make choices for yourself to a satisfactory degree. If the kids wants to listen to his parents, good. If he wants to listen to his doctors, good as well. If the kid doesn't want it, then they shouldn't give it to him, its his life. He knows the risks of going the natural way, he might die. But that's a risk I'm sure he's aware of.

I am not okay with parents who let their child needlessly die and that is what would have happened if someone hadn't stepped in.

Let him "needlessly" die, if he wants to. His parents aren't letting him do anything, he's not someone's property.



[edit on 16-5-2009 by ghaleon12]

reply to post by jd140


Yeah, like Lance Armstrong? It's so rare, that if you atually do survive cancer and live life cancer free, you become a celebrity. Take a clue buddy....

Duplicate Thread:

Please post in the ongoing discussion..

Ongoing

Closing

Thank you

Semper