Incan walls... How did they do it?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 15-5-2009 @ 07:53 PM by SLAYER69
Yeah some of them are just crazy in size and the shapes.




Stones

Archaeological Excavations Lead To Discovery Of Inca

For quite some time, the National Institute of Culture (I.N.C.), has been quite busy with the archaeological excavations that are being carried out in Toronto, in the area of the Sanctuary of Machu Picchu in Peru. But now there seems to be a new page that has unfolded. An Inca stone of 41 angels has been found during one of these archaeological excavations.

According to information received, the finding was confirmed by the president of the project, Omar Spanish Gutierrez, who referred that the stone measures are 6 meters high and 2,50 meters wide, and also said that it has the form of a flame.

The archaeologist Mario Febran Gomez, said that the stone is located in the religious precinct Nro. 9 of the sector of Torontoy (kilometer 91,500 of the way Cusco-Machu Picchu).


[edit on 15-5-2009 by SLAYER69]



reply posted on 15-5-2009 @ 07:56 PM by spines
reply to post by Gawdzilla



That's interesting. How large were the stones used for the demonstration?

I would imagine that they wouldn't go 'all out' in recreating the size and complexity of the ancient structures, but just how much trouble was the process giving to how many men?


reply posted on 15-5-2009 @ 08:03 PM by Gawdzilla
Originally posted by spines
reply to
post by Gawdzilla



That's interesting. How large were the stones used for the demonstration?

I would imagine that they wouldn't go 'all out' in recreating the size and complexity of the ancient structures, but just how much trouble was the process giving to how many men?


The one I saw was about the size of the center stone in the OP pix, if I read that right, about one meter cube. Weighed in excess of 1,000 kilograms. They only used 20 men on a side, and had it fit in about 30 minutes. Apparently you only have to move the stone about three inches each way. The people on the scene estimated they could have reduced the time by using levers instead of simply pushing it. Pre-dressing would also speed things oup.


reply posted on 15-5-2009 @ 09:19 PM by spines
reply to post by Gawdzilla



That's incredibly interesting. I like that as a plausible answer to how they are so well placed in their final positions, but what about the sometimes long distances they had to move the stones?

I am not adressing you so much as wondering if they had any inkling of an explination at the recreation; they seem to have a better idea about the logistics of these things than most of us do.

Hands on as opposed to my computer screen.


reply posted on 15-5-2009 @ 09:46 PM by Schmidt1989
reply to post by spines



On the show I watched, they explained how the Incas used various methods to move the very large stones long distances.

First, they beveled the bottom of the stone. This makes the stone much more movable, and decreases the amount of pressure needed to push/pull the stone by half. A 30 ton stone would then only take 15 tons worth of work to move.

Second, they made cobblestone pathways, which reduced friction to move the large rocks.

Thats really all I can remember, like I said, I was getting ready for work at the time, the show didn't have my full concentration... I wish I could watch it again. Hoping for a rerun, ill record it.


reply posted on 15-5-2009 @ 11:13 PM by spines
reply to post by Schmidt1989



Do you remember what channel it was on? Maybe I could search around and find some good watching later.

The more viewpoints the better on something like this. I find it easy to fall into whatever it is I am leaning towards most.



reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 12:04 PM by Schmidt1989
reply to post by spines



I believe it was probably history, or National Geographic perhaps. I have about 4 or 5 different history channels so it could have been any one of them.


reply posted on 16-5-2009 @ 12:58 PM by Gawdzilla
Originally posted by spines
reply to
post by Gawdzilla



That's incredibly interesting. I like that as a plausible answer to how they are so well placed in their final positions, but what about the sometimes long distances they had to move the stones?

I am not adressing you so much as wondering if they had any inkling of an explination at the recreation; they seem to have a better idea about the logistics of these things than most of us do.

Hands on as opposed to my computer screen.


The key to moving the stones is really simple. Time. They were on a "sacred" mission or paying their "taxes" with labor, so it didn't matter how long they took. They might not have even considered that it would be done in their lifetimes in some cases. Remember that after the crops were in the ground tending could be left to children and women, so the men would be available to move stones. (In Europe this was called "the campaigning season".)

On a slight side rail: I often see people say, "They didn't even have the WHEEL!" Moving a multi-ton stone on a wagon with very little metal available and wooden wheels? I don't think so.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 7 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 15 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags