It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I find that many times the bible contains both sides/ways of things, and it is taken as one.
The bible and things like it are merely expressions of understanding.
Do you like mystery novels?
I work in human behavior or behavioral science. Asking questions draws the person out. Sorry!!
I'm sorry if you do not like it, but the mind can fabricate every single part of the religious experience.
Originally posted by MatrixProphet
reply to post by Welfhard
I'm sorry if you do not like it, but the mind can fabricate every single part of the religious experience.
Says who? Sounds like 'Dawkins.
this explains the dichotomy between the spirit and the flesh, described in several places in new and old testaments.
Originally posted by Miraj
Yeah it is actually. I hold some belief that the decline in religion is somewhat caused by literacy. Obviously this isn't the case with a religion such as Judaism or Islam (Where they HAVE to read, recite, and remember their texts)
I actually like the bible. Sometimes it's fun to read, because of the great stories. But to me its like a book that contains stories of greek mythology.
[edit on 15-5-2009 by Miraj]
Originally posted by undo
to be honest, i believe the old testament does have a problem. i believe the accounts of our creation and subsequent events are based on the activities of 2 different god-beings: Enlil and Enki, who are combined into the same god-being in the first 5 books of the bible (due to the god word LIL being turned into an one size fits all word)
my theory goes like this:
enlil created us as spirits (we were made in his image and he's a spirit being)
later, enki created a flesh container to house/entrap our spirits. this was the fall of man. enlil is the biblical jehovah and enki is the biblical serpent in the garden. this explains the dichotomy between the spirit and the flesh, described in several places in new and old testaments.
[edit on 18-5-2009 by undo]
Originally posted by The Last Man on Earth
I think you should look at it as you would Grim's Fairytales. It isn't real, has no basis in reality and if you have to start reaching, then it's time to give it up and look facts in the face.
Much as MatrixProphet should. I've never heard such rubbish. But then I guess I'm merely a "left brain thinker".
there is nothing inherently wrong with randomly killing someone, other than it not being helpful for a stable society?
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by blueorder
there is nothing inherently wrong with randomly killing someone, other than it not being helpful for a stable society?
That's not the way atheist think, they believe in treating your fellow man the way you wish to be treated, this is basic stuff. There are plenty of religious nuts who kill people, fear of God doesn't stop them, while there are plenty of atheist who could not hurt a fly.
[edit on 18-5-2009 by rapinbatsisaltherage]
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
That's not the way atheist think, they believe in treating your fellow man the way you wish to be treated, this is basic stuff. There are plenty of religious nuts who kill people, fear of God doesn't stop them, while there are plenty of atheist who could not hurt a fly.
Originally posted by The Last Man on Earth
Thank you thank you thank you!
What scares me most are the religious types who actually put this argument across - like fear of God is the only reason they don't go around killing people! And they think atheists lack morality!
Why should they "believe" that
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
Because they are human, and humans have the ability to feel empathy.
That and some civilized teachings is all it takes.
Most people who don't want to harm anyone don't wish to because they simply do not desire to, it is not something that is of interest to them
and they see it as wrong because they are able to feel what that person may feel, they understand that it is not their place to interfere with another's life.
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
Because they are human, and humans have the ability to feel empathy.
empathy does not necessarily imply compassion or any notion of being "wrong"
That and some civilized teachings is all it takes.
"civilized" teachings, whatever that may be, if it is secular and has no spiritual/religious input, will not be able to "moralise" murder for example, other than societal problem which would cause instability
Most people who don't want to harm anyone don't wish to because they simply do not desire to, it is not something that is of interest to them
I did not ask why most people do not do it- a pretty major reason would be going to jail, execution etc
and they see it as wrong because they are able to feel what that person may feel, they understand that it is not their place to interfere with another's life.
"wrong" in any sense other than legal, has no meaning for someone who is a relentless darwinist
empathy does not necessarily imply compassion or any notion of being "wrong"
if it is secular and has no spiritual/religious input, will not be able to "moralise" murder for example
I did not ask why most people do not do it
"wrong" in any sense other than legal, has no meaning for someone who is a relentless Darwinist
Originally posted by The Last Man on Earth
It seems to me that the only relentless Darwinists exist in the heads of the religiously-minded.
She gave you perfectly good reasons, which you did not accept.
It isn't that jail holds little appeal, its that people have a concience, and do not wish to actually go around killing each other. That's it.
It goes back to tribal structures, and how each individual was essential to the surivival of the tribe, if you want to be a Darwinist about it.
But ultimately, you scare me. If God and jail are the only things that stop you killing...please seek help.