It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
2 More Die From Swine Flu, 3 NYC Schools Shut Down
Ex-Astronaut Lisa Nowak Withdraws Insanity Plea
Family: Co-Pilot Wasn't Sick, Tired or Inexperienced
NBA Player Wayman Tisdale Dies at 44 of Cancer
Couple Dies in Murder-Suicide in Illinois Cemetery
NASCAR Driver Mayfield's Positive Test Not for Steroids
Deaths from Flu: 63,730 annual deaths for influenza and pneumonia (NVSR Sep 2001); estimated 20,000 deaths from flu (NIAID)
From: Biggest Disinfo agent ring in the world
Swine Flu 'Pandemic': What it proves
The swine flu pandemic was helpful in proving the power of the MSN in another form. It's ability to capture the nation with a perceived threat, and systematically remove rights, cause mass panic, have people again wasting 1000's of hours talking about nothing. And, even on THIS forum, their well oiled propaganda machine worked amazingly well. Even admins were feverishly pushing the swine flu garbage, before realizing the Media had again hoodwinked them.
Honestly, if 1 week before the "SWINE FLU FRENZY" someone came to this forum and said "Closing the border to mexico will be on the table of possibilities in a couple weeks" they would have been ridiculed off the board without a doubt. But in the face of a "Pandemic", it was an easy possibility. Thus proving how quickly the world could change for ALL of us, if the Media portrays a threat even worse than the swine flu.
King9072 - Biggest Disinfo ring in the world
We must stop the media from skewing facts, rather than stating them. We must stop the media from protecting interests, rather than exposing them. We must stop the media, from being unchecked, and given a free ride to lie, manipulate, plant and distort facts. We must stop the media, for every great change that we desire, hinges on our ability to sway the media into being an ally, rather than enemy. Without them on our side, there is no way that anything can ever be done to destroy the pavement of the road to tyranny.
Originally posted by DragonsDemesne
This is why the only MSM news I ever watch with any regularity (and this is still maybe once a month) is 60 minutes, because they still take on some of the real issues. They still have some pretty stupid stories, too, but at least they have some that are of real value, which is more than any other MSM has.
Originally posted by A.M.L.
What I think most ATS users would like is a change in consumer taste in relation to news. I don't know what needs to happen to do this, however.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by A.M.L.
What I think most ATS users would like is a change in consumer taste in relation to news. I don't know what needs to happen to do this, however.
To me this is like NASA suddenly switching its agenda from space exploration to predicting trends in fashion, and justifying it by saying they are receiving larger contracts now. It's a sell-out, plain and simple.
The press, especially "news," is supposed to serve a purpose, that is not entertainment. That is why it's in the bill of rights that our press is to remain free from government restrictions (NOT because our founding fathers loved their celebrities so much ). But you'll notice in the past few decades, some ~95% or so of all media has been bought up by about 5 or 6 mega-corporations like General Electric, Sony, Hearst, and Time Warner, that are huge lobbyists. General Electric owns huge chunks of our major media and simultaneously makes a killing off of producing bombs for our military. Now think about that conflict of interest for a second, especially the next time you hear news "pundits" talking about reasons we should go to war with so-and-so, or continue war with so-and-so, or escalate our efforts, etc.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Originally posted by A.M.L.
If I may guess as to the point you are trying to make, you're saying that because of corporate presense in media that it [the mass media] is producing unprofessional, biased, and incompetent journalism. Is that what you're saying? Correct me if I am wrong.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by A.M.L.
If I may guess as to the point you are trying to make, you're saying that because of corporate presense in media that it [the mass media] is producing unprofessional, biased, and incompetent journalism. Is that what you're saying? Correct me if I am wrong.
No, I'm saying huge corporations are buying out all US media because it is a strategic asset to them. Most explicitly General Electric, creating the conflict of interest I just mentioned. Maybe you are naive enough to see nothing wrong with getting your war news from the same company making bombs, but I'm not. Also look back to your history books about what happened to the media in Nazi Germany. It not only played a role, it played a critical role in the rise of Nazism. You are a little peasant compared to the people running these companies; they are not like you or me. They do not think like you or me. If you can't get your head into that ball game then I can't help you.
Originally posted by A.M.L.
Can you rectify the fact that NBC has published stories that are critical of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Why would General Electric allow it's subsidary to publish articles that would detract from support of the war?
Originally posted by A.M.L.
Can you rectify the fact that NBC has published stories that are critical of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Why would General Electric allow it's subsidary to publish articles that would detract from support of the war?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by A.M.L.
Can you rectify the fact that NBC has published stories that are critical of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Why would General Electric allow it's subsidary to publish articles that would detract from support of the war?
Because it's better than having actual independent journalism analyze what is going on. SOMEONE is going to be critical of the wars, because they are insane from a foreign policy standpoint, which is why the UN laughed in our faces when we asked for help to invade Iraq. If you heard nothing but good things about war on your television even YOU would experience cognitive dissonance, because something is not right about that. It's no different than using the Republican/Democrat polarization to fold people against themselves while things NOBODY wants are implemented by both "sides." It's surprising to me that you would not have thought of this before you asked me; do you not think the most powerful institutions that exist in this country would think of this? Do you think they don't study human psychology or tailor to it? Have you never studied advertising gimmicks?