reply to post by poedxsoldiervet
A passive option will work if the chinese and russians do it at the same time. After all, we are all humans, now we are all networked and, in case you
haven't realised it, we are all one.
I personally don't believe there will be anymore massive invasions for a long time. Iraq, Afghanistan (both russia's and america's), Vietnam have
all been fiascos. And nobody is going to invade the US, not because of the military, which would be nuked to oblivion in less than 3 hours, but
because of the armed civil population. Invasions simply don't work, never have, never will. You can't conquor a nation unless you eliminate the
population faster than it multiplies, and this has never been done in human history, that I am aware of. It was attempted with the Jews for example.
Life is stronger than death.
The military does not defend against anything. And, in case you haven't noticed, the US military is not a defense force, that is just orwellian
double speak, it is a tool of occupation and invasion which works for the psychopathocracy and not the american people. It is in the process of being
converted into a fascist internal repression force, which is why you had the national guard shipped out to iraq, for example.
Every person has an option not to fight, not to destroy. Sometimes it implies running away. But I would rather pack my honour and move it than have my
silly ego tell me I have to risk death to keep it.
There is
always a better way than militarism. Although I am not against responsible civilians being armed, it's a personal choice.
[edit on 15-5-2009 by Mindmelding]