reply to post by MagicaRose
Just the precedents that we are setting; what goes around comes around.
In Iraq, a million people have been killed because a gang of criminals (the leaders of which had been trained and funded by the CIA) who had trained
in Afghanistan AND THE U.S. (!) carried out (or so we have been told) the 9/11 attack.
We are constantly told of the evil "foreign fighters" opposing the U.S. military in Iraq. Perhaps this person travelled the entire FIVE MILES from
Iran to join the resistance to the occupation. Yet, a Phillipino, who travels halfway around the globe to immigrate to the U.S., then halfway around
the globe again to Iraq to serve as an "American" soldier IS NOT referred to as "foreign" to Iraq. As if the Phillipino (or American) belongs in
the Middle East but the Iranian (or Syrian, Saudi, Yemeni etc.) does not.
Imagine this: Another nation invades the U.S. based on the premise that we possess WMD's along with the fact that our president is an egomaniacal
lunatic. Their goal is actually to acquire needed resources, while enriching the "elite" and the "defense" industry of the invading nation and
distracting their own people from the fact that they are being screwed coming and going. Not to mention the opportunity to develop, test and finance
weapons which could easily be used against their own people should any object to going along with the "program". Any Americans who resist this
invasion are described as "insurgents" and "terrorists". The "Iraq" precedent.
The invasion of Afghanistan SEEMED justified when we were told that the target was al-Qaida, but now binLaden et al are "not important" and we are
engaged in exterminating a religious group (the Taliban). We are told that this is due to the fact that al-Qaida trained in Afghanistan while the
Taliban was in power (don't forget that al-Qaida trained in the U.S. while OUR government was in power!)
Imagine this: A terrorist attack occurs in mainland China. China blames MS-13 (the Central-American gang) for the attack and asserts that they trained
for the attack while residing in the United States. Christians made up the majority of elected officials in the U.S. government at the time of the
China invades the U.S., ostensibly to take out the MS-13 organization, but in reality begins targeting ALL CHRISTIANS instead. Homes filled with
Christian families are bombed, with the Chinese media voicing the justification: "SUSPECTED (i.e. not confirmed) terrorists were BELIEVED (i.e. not
confirmed) to be hiding in the structure". Note that the Chinese define "terrorist" as "a Christian who fights back".This is the precedent we
have set in Afghanistan.
Our military moves make sense when you view the U.S. military as the "Global Corporate Militia". They do the bidding of the Global Corporations.
These corporations, many of whom originated in the U.S., gladly share whores, champagne and profits with the Communist Chinese leaders and others.
They are only loyal to the goal of profiting from the chaos created when war rages and populations are thrown together and torn apart by their
Their global vision could not succeed with a homogenous and nationalistic U.S. in existence, hence their programs to Balkanize and divide the American
People. They cannot depend on an American (in my dictionary, a Citizen of the United States who is of European descent) military to turn against it's
own people, hence the focus on rampant third-world immigration along with efforts to recruit these immigrants into the police & military forces.
If these "Explorers" ever end up on the border, it will be in attempt to keep us from leaving, not to keep foreigners out. I was suspicious of the
"border fence" in the same way: more likely they decided to build it in anticipation of Americans seeking to escape from what is likely coming.
[edit on 17-5-2009 by whitewolf60]