It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Expect to hear from John Christy of the Earth System Science Ctr at UA-Huntsville; a climatologist who refuses to accept funds from oil or auto industries. He was a lead author of the 2001 IPCC report and an author of AGU's 2003 statement on climate change. Christy is not calling for drastic cuts in CO2.
Christy has produced reams of data that undermine arguments that earth is warming at an unusual rate and question if remedies being considered do any good.
(Interview follows at link.)
Q. During your House Ways and Means testimony, you showed a chart juxtaposing predictions made by NASA's Jim Hansen in 1988 for future temperature increases against the actual recorded temperature increases over the past 20 years. Not only were the actual increases much lower, but they were lower than what Hansen expected if there were drastic cuts in CO2 emissions - which of course there haven't been. [Hansen is a noted scientist who was featured prominently in Al Gore's global warming documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth."] Hansen was at that hearing. Did he say anything to you afterwards?
A. We really don't communicate. We serve on a committee for NASA together, but it only deals with specific satellite issues. At the Ways and Means hearing, he was sitting two people down from me, but he did not want to engage any of the evidence I presented. And that seems to be the preferred tactic of many in the alarmist camp. Rather than bring up these issues, they simply ignore them.
Note: (Contacted by Fortune, Hansen acknowledges that his 1988 projections were based on a model that "slightly" overstated the warming created by a doubling in CO2 levels. His new model posits a rise of 3 degrees Celsius in global temperatures by 2100, vs. 4.2 degrees in the old one. Says Hansen, "The projections that the public has been hearing about are based on a climate sensitivity that is consistent with the global warming rate of the past few decades."
Christy's response: "Hansen at least admits his 1988 forecasts were wrong, but doesn't say they were way wrong, not 'slightly,' as he states." Christy also claims that even Hansen's revised models grossly overestimated the amount of warming that has actually occurred.)
But we still need to curb our fossil fuel usage. And turn off lights to conserve electricity. And install solar panels because they HELP.
You should care about your environment. Warming isn't the only problem. Deforestation? Pollution? Littering? Habitat loss?
It's not worth your Hummer.
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
... either way, pollution is real. It may or may not be heating up the world (I think it is, but regardless) it's affecting our HEALTH. And the health of thousands of species.
But we still need to curb our fossil fuel usage. And turn off lights to conserve electricity. And install solar panels because they HELP.
You should care about your environment. Warming isn't the only problem. Deforestation? Pollution? Littering? Habitat loss?
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by getreadyalready
As China and India continue to develop that will be more and more people consuming power.
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
It's not worth your Hummer.
Originally posted by jdub297
Flexible, cheap solar cells will soon be available (w/i 1 year) that deliver power at $0.10 per watt, even in ambient light and from oblique angles to the source. There's hope in renewables.