posted on May, 13 2009 @ 07:45 PM
I have to disagree. I'm tired of this intelligence agency bashing. It serves no good purpose. If you want to really understand what is possibly
happening, you have to ask some tough questions. This means putting your indignation aside and think for a moment.
Here is an interesting twist on the abhorent mind control studies done from 1940's forward. Ask why? What possible valid reason could they have for
It most likely has nothing to do with terrestrial concerns!
It seems outrageous that branches of our government would risk doing these types of illegal experiments for such simplistic motivations involving
intelligence work with other human organizations or governments.
What does make sense in the ET piece. How often have we heard about ET abductions which the abductee recounts their lost time and inability to control
If that kind of advanced natural or artifical technology exists, our intelligence services would be tasked with finding a way to defend against it. We
cound not risk having our leaders coopted by some alien mind ray.
Sure there are also many reports of abductee's who talk about "men in black", but all those reports are overlaid with the abductee's conscious
interpretation. Whitley is always talking about his experience with Owl's who end up being Alien's, so there is some kind of functional mental
overlay which colors the truth.
I would be very concerned about not being in control mentally, if confronted with a superior technology or intellect.
As in any war, humans would eventually become necessary casualties of the conflict. If the war is over our soul and minds, you cannot use monkey's to
test for resistance. Humans would be the only logical choice.
If it is a war, then at some point we would have had to make a determination of "friend or foe". If most of this kind of perception of non terestial
biological entities occured in the last 80 years, we would see them differently than our ancient ancestors. We would not see them as Gods, Angels or
Demons, but as evolved creations of the greater universe. Not as Good or Evil, but as entities with an agenda. This may be part of the problem, as we
have complicated the picture and assigned our humanization standards or filters to them.
Good or Evil, Friend or Foe, we tend towards some cut and dry, black and white definitions of those not like us. If ET's exist then we can be assured
that any governing human body would work to define them in those terms.
Your either for us or against us. Rather than simply "not us".
Finding a way to protect ourselves and leaders against them is only logical.
The real question is; at what cost? From the typical tenor of the forum posts here, most are not willing to pay the price of this kind of freedom.
Hence, the need to keep the civilians in the dark.
[edit on 13-5-2009 by GriffinRD]