It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[11] --------------------------------------------------------------
Debris from the crash has been found up to 8 miles from the crash site, but searchers are concentrating on the crater where most of the remains are located. Papers and other light objects were carried aloft by the explosion after impact of the plane and they were transported by a nine-knot wind. www.post-gazette.com...
[12] --------------------------------------------------------------
Pictures www.vaed.uscourts.gov... www.vaed.uscourts.gov... Live news coverage showing debris www.youtube.com... The hijacker's license bp0.blogger.com...
[13] --------------------------------------------------------------
FBI spokesman Bill Crowley said that the largest piece
of plane recovered was a shred of fuselage skin that
covered four windows -- a piece seven feet long
from a jetliner that was 155 feet long. The
heaviest piece, he said, was a half-ton section
of engine fan.
www.post-gazette.com...
www.washingtonpost.com...
[14] --------------------------------------------------------------
Once he was able to absorb the scene, Miller says, "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service." As a funeral director, Miller says, he is honored and humbled to preside over what has become essentially an immense cemetery stretching far into the scenic wooded mountain ridge. He considers it the final resting place of 40 national heroes. He saw dust, not bodies.
[15] --------------------------------------------------------------
Flight Data Recorder data and WTC data for Flt 93 www.ntsb.gov...
[16] --------------------------------------------------------------
THE NORAD RESPONSE TO 9/11 Compiled by Andrew Burfield forums.randi.org...
[17] --------------------------------------------------------------
VIDEO: Eyewitnesses to Flt93 crash (0:1:15) www.youtube.com...
[18] --------------------------------------------------------------
Phone calls from Flight 93 9/11 Commission folder entitled "Flight 93 Calls - General". 911myths.com...:Team7_Box12_93Calls_General.2.pdf
[19] --------------------------------------------------------------
Flight 93 Radar track i286.photobucket.com...
[20] --------------------------------------------------------------
Crash debris found 8 miles away
www.pittsburghlive.com...
www.pittsburghlive.com...
www.pittsburghlive.com...
[21] --------------------------------------------------------------
Olsen Phone calls discussed
forums.randi.org...
Originally posted by turbofan
Let me help you with this weak/dis-info post:
[1] DNA for all passangers crew found and identified
Along with the terrorists right? The kind of DNA
that can withstand all the 'fire' and melt engine parts?
Originally posted by turbofan
[2] The hole
Made by what? Proof?
Originally posted by turbofan
[3] 95% of the airplane recovered in the hole
Where are the photos? Proof?
Originally posted by turbofan
[4] Black boxes recovered and analyzed
Several anomalies including an auto pilot that does not disengage
with extreme yoke movement. Please view P4T's analysis (again
done by certified professionals that can be verified at FAA.gov....not
some kid with an internet account).
Originally posted by turbofan
[5] Video of Phanton hitting wall
So? What's the point? It breaks apart and doesn't go through
the wall. How does that support your case?
Originally posted by turbofan
You can't have small pieces breaking up AND digging 165 foot holes in
the ground; and breaking up the Pentagon.
Originally posted by turbofan
[6] Lots of Flight 93 links
Wow, I have lots of bread in my fridge. Where's the proof?
Originally posted by turbofan
[7] 1960 Air-to-air collision NYC
And? Point? I saw two dogs going for a walk yesterday in Detroit.
Originally posted by turbofan
[8] Analysis of Flt 93 Balck Boxes
see P4T reference above.
Originally posted by turbofan
[9] 1,200 investigators and first responders
1,201 bottles of beer.
first responders on video saying they saw nothing. Pictures of the
crash site that show nothing. Some of which arrived before any
authority. Nice...ummm...try
Originally posted by turbofan
[10] Remains of aircraft in storage.
My cars are in storage. Want to see PICTURES?
Originally posted by turbofan
[11] Papers & light objects found up to 8 miles from the crash
Yup, that normally happens when an aircraft is shot down, or breaks
up in mid air.
Originally posted by turbofan
[12] Pictures
Flowers
Originally posted by turbofan
[13] Largest peice of Flt 93 was half a ton
Normally happens in a shoot down, or mid-air break up. Wait...where
did I read that before?
Originally posted by turbofan
[14] Coroner Statement
Eye witness VIDEO accounts. By the way, is this the same guy saying
he went to the site and didn't see any bodies?
Originally posted by turbofan
[15] Flight Data Recorder data and WTC data for Flt 93
P4T
Originally posted by turbofan
[16] THE NORAD RESPONSE TO 9/11 COmplete timing and FAA info
Care to narrow that down a bit? Which part specifically should we
debate?
Originally posted by turbofan
[17] VIDEO: Eyewitnesses to Flt93 crash
VIDEO, PICS of eye witnesses proving otherwise supported by lack of
government co-operation to show that their official story holds water.
Originally posted by turbofan
[18] Phone calls from Flight 93
Proven impossible. Please study RF technology.
I can certainly help you in that department.
Originally posted by turbofan
[19] Flight 93 Radar track
See discussion about ALT and Speed with respect to "coast mode"
Originally posted by turbofan
[20] Crash debris found 8 miles away
Already covered above.
Originally posted by turbofan
[21] Olsen Phone calls discussed
Yes, it was easily debunked. Enjoyed it, along with the experiments
conducted by REAL people with cell phones in aircraft.
Originally posted by turbofan
Not bad "Mr. Reheat". Out of 21 points, you failed miserably on 20 points.
You can say with a straight face that a jumbo jet crashed in this place?
The dis-info material your handler is teaching you is getting lamer by the day!
Originally posted by turbofan
[13] Largest peice of Flt 93 was half a ton
Normally happens in a shoot down, or mid-air break up. Wait...where
did I read that before?
Originally posted by turbofan
Well Treb, let me give you one scenario (unlike yourself with the cab thread):
Missile hits plane at altitude.
Expansion of gasses, explosive pressure, shockwaves, etc. all contribute
to breaking up the aircraft.
Originally posted by turbofan
Wrong again, as usual…
It seems you are out of date on your missile technology (which is not
surprising). Here are some of the latest models used to date (and pre 2001):
AIM 9X
AIM 120
Also note you are comparing a fighter jet which is designed to withstand missile strikes, uses special fuel to resist explosion and has less fuel on board.
You will notice that when a wing is clipped, or tail section is clipped on a fighter, there is little damage, and/or flame.
Most of the weight in (sic) central to the fuselage to allow agile flight.
Now imagine those missiles igniting all that fuel in a commercial airliner which was fully loaded with fuel.
Originally posted by trebor451
The defining characteristic of the AIM9X would be?? Vectored thrust and off-boresight /90 degree tracking. What does that have to do with the discussion on whether or not a 20 lb sidewinder warhead can blow up a 757? Same 20 lb warhead as previous versions. Dodging the question and changing the discussion and off topic – PfT tactic #1.
Plus, AIM-9X IOC (initial operational capability) was November 2003, a tad after you claimed it could have been used by an Air National Guard pilot on 9/11.
Is this your idea of “debate”? Posting a video? PFT tactic #2
You will notice that when a wing is clipped, or tail section is clipped on a fighter, there is little damage, and/or flame.
Why do you ignore the examples of airliners being hit by anti-aircraft missiles and surviving? You don’t seem to understand what is going on here.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by turbofan
You seriously do not know what you're talking about.
Originally posted by turbofan
Also note you are comparing a fighter jet which is designed to withstand missile strikes, uses special fuel to resist explosion and has less fuel on board. Futhermore, the fuel tanks are not in the wings of fighter jets.
Most of the weight in central to the fuselage to allow agile flight.
Originally posted by turbofan
It's not a "tactic" in the sense of an excuse; it's an effective method
of showing GL's what happens in the real world.
Originally posted by turbofan
I'll link up some modern diagrams of jet fighter fuel tanks vs. commercial
airliner fuel tanks so you can see the difference. You have successfully
shown fuel tank locations in a few fighters; good stuff. A bit further out
than I have seen in more current jets, however nothing in the tips of the
wings like a commercial airliner.
Originally posted by turbofan
I do also realize that a hit to the wings, or under belly fuel tank section
will destroy it.
Originally posted by turbofan
The point is, I have proven that a missile strike to a fuel tank on a fighter
which is DESIGNED to resist destruction can be blown up.
Originally posted by turbofan
Sometimes you have to wonder who you're debating on the other side
of this screen, "Trebor".
Originally posted by ReheatTrebor has correctly DESTROYED each and everyone of these statements. (Echo) You seriously do not know what you're talking about.
An IR missile will go at the engine and a radar missile will most likely go to the fuselage.
Destroy it how? Cause little bitty pieces to fall over an 8 mile radius?....hardly.
Sure, a A-A missile hitting a fuel tank on any aircraft is likely to produce an explosion. There will still be big pieces falling to the ground.
Describe details of how a fighter is designed to resist destruction by a missile if the missile actually hits... Do you really know anything at all about aircraft construction?