reply to post by Kokatsi
SUMMARY
So, you need TWO ZODIACS to have World Ages at all. The one I use for everyday astrology is according to the stars, sidereal. The other one comes from
the four cardinal points - the equal days defining spring and fall, and the longest day and the longest night. That is what most Western astrologers
use for everyday astrology. It is called tropical - moving.
Imagine two wheels with the same 12 equal zodiac signs, with the starting point zero degrees Aries right upon the other zero degree Aries.
That was supposed to happen some two hundred - or latest four-five hundred years - after Jesus. Then start to rotate the four-star wheel slowly
backwards over the other one (which is practically unchanging for millions of years).
Right now we are about 24 degrees backwards, the rate is about one degree backwards every 70 years.
This is precession.
It does not matter which of the two zodiacs people use for everyday astrology. Results will speak for themselves.
However, if you want to say something about world ages, you've got to look at the relationship of TWO ZODIAC WHEELS TO EACH OTHER.
There are several theories where the exact boundaries of the sidereal zodiac are. That yields slightly different dates for the coincidence.
People who think we could be in the Age of Aquarius unconsciously refer to a time pattern which would put the appearance of Christianity (a Pisces
phenomenon) BEFORE THE BIRTH OF Jesus. That's right.
If we are in Aquarius now or already in 2012, and the whole precessional cycle is about 25-26,000 years, it follows that Christianity began about
three hundred years before Jesus.
That would be quite a bold statement...
In this thread I was not exhorting anyone to use the zodiac I use along with many Oriental astrologers. BTW, there are many varieties, Western
astrologers working with the sidereal, and for a rarity there are Indian astrologers (usually outside of India) that experiment with tropical...
I merely pointed out that you need to move TWO WHEELS over each other to arrive at World Ages at all. Wherever Aries 0 degree of the tropical is,
that's where the Age is named after...
The rest you can caluculate in your head.
However, back to content, I do think there are important gateways to Aquarius these days as well in 2011-2012, and then on. The energy needs cleansing
before we arrive there. I will try to write about that in another thread when I have the time to recap them. Many Western astrologers who do not know
the correct world ages make very good summaries and predictions of these years.
From the above it makes sense that Western astrologers working with tropical do not need the other zodiac for their everyday work.
(I wish more of them would acknowledge in some gestures sometimes that there are other zodiacs and other astrologies too. Indians for example must
have a rough concept of the Western tropical zodiac as a starting point, otherwise they cannot understand their own calculations. This is not
mutual.)
So the other topic will be without all the astrological or technical stuff, just some thoughts on the results of where the planets will be in the
coming years. I would be looking forward to contributions both from prophets, seers, and tropical astrologers or Chinese or Mayan astrologers.
Of other world age systems too.
When I post that thread I will make a note here. U2U me if you have any more remarks, comments or technical questions. I will try to answer.
And I will keep on referring to this thread whenever I think someone could use some background in the astrological theory of the world ages and the
two zodiacs.
Perhaps this topic is way too technical and dry, the other one won't be... It will be a few days at the least. (I will have to compare notes and
sound lectures.)
Thanks for all flagging me and giving me feedback...
Kokatsi