It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The trustees for Social Security and Medicare are scheduled to provide their annual report on the finances of both programs on Tuesday. In advance of the release, many private analysts said they expected both programs could run out of cash sooner than last predicted.
Originally posted by finemanm
Thats funny, 2041. That is the year I turn 65.
Don't worry, there won't be a need for Social Security beyond 2012.
reply to post by jam321
IMO, the government should be obligate to put the money collected for these entitlements into a trust fund and NOT BE allowed to touch a penny for any other purpose except for what it was intended for.
Originally posted by tamusan
As have most Americans, I have been paying into Social Security all my working life. I always thought that there may be nothing for them to give back to me when I reach 65. It looks like they will not be able to pay benefits by 2041. Even bleaker is medicare, which is thought to be sustainable only to the year 2019.
www.msnbc.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Ninety-five percent of Chilean workers opted for a PRA system. Why wouldn’t they? According to summaries provided by Jose Pinera, the architect of PRAs, retirement, disability and survivors benefits (included) are already 50 percent to 100 percent higher than under the old system. Most current retirees didn’t own PRAs their entire career. Still, the average Chilean’s income from a PRA is 78 percent of his pre-retirement income, a level that is strictly fantasy material for most U.S. Social Security beneficiaries.
For Chileans, their PRA is private property and becomes part of their estate at death. Americans’ payroll taxes go to the Social Security Trust Fund, property of the government. Worse, all the money has been drained from the Trust Fund, leaving only promissory notes. It’s as if you planned for your child’s college education by putting an IOU in a cigar box every year. Your child’s ability to afford college would be as shaky as the Social Security benefits of today’s youth.
Chile’s PRA system has other advantages. It has reduced poverty by increasing the size and certainty of retirement, survivors and disability benefits. The availability of capital has substantially improved Chile’s economic productivity and employment. Retirement issues are no longer political.
But most importantly, Chileans have escaped the perverse pay-as-you-go system, in which current workers are required to pay the pensions for a mushrooming population of retirees. Chilean workers know that future financial crisis and intergenerational tensions won’t be necessary to sustain them in old age. They have real financial security.
Why should Americans settle for less?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
SS was a temporary insurance program. It was never meant to last a decade let alone all this time it has lasted.
Then we have all these people who dont use it as insurance and instead try to retire off of it. WTF is that about?