It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by m0r1arty
Whilst I agree with your most recent post about secrets, and why those with power want to keep them and dislike the internet. I do have to at
I didn't see a saucer shape - and if you did then I'm going to assume that you'd be a great candidate for seeing ice particles too.
In the second video I saw 1 white object pass by the the shuttle, but with any lack of depth to put it in - it may have been either orbital around the Earth or running parallel to the shuttle in the opposite direction.
I'm not going to say "Definitely not a UFO", because they were in space, existed and are unidentified. But I'm pretty sure that without further knowledge we can't say "Ice Particle" or "Saucer".
Originally posted by tombangelta
Could there be any correlation between this mission and the announcement at the recent UFO conference about full disclosure by the current administration.
I hope so.........................
Originally posted by RiotComing
Well I've just done some screen captures off the YouTube full screen and zoomed in on the object, took a few caps as it flits by in the second video..
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/17d03bf4bab9.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4269da899ab2.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/150d2951ebc8.jpg[/atsimg]
NowI know it's a tad blurry (we are capturing off YouTube after all!!) but heck, it looks like a classic saucer shape to me, even with the wee dome on top.....
Originally posted by RiotComing
Stephen Greer always said that we have the ETV (extra terrestial vehicles) and the ARV (alien reproduction vehicle), which are the crafts we have reverse-engineered since the Roswell incident in 1947. So, in my opinion, the object I have captured onscreen here is one of 2 options: and ETV or an ARV. It doesn't matter which one it is.. NASA are deceiving us whichever way you look at it.
Originally posted by NeonStar
I cant believe how people are so quick to jump to wild conclusions re space visitors etc. Of course the moving objects are merely human created object, be it satellites or other debris.
Come on poeple, its crack pots who make these outlandish claims of aliens based on this weak evidence who give the entire disclosure project a bad name and keep it out of mainstream.
Originally posted by RiotComing
As for Steven Greer. He did a lot more for getting the UFO issue out in the open than you have done.
Originally posted by RiotComing
It's amazing witnessing the vitriol and denial I am seeing here on this thread... and here I was thinking I was among friends on a conspiracy site!
Originally posted by mckyle
Originally posted by RiotComing
As for Steven Greer. He did a lot more for getting the UFO issue out in the open than you have done.
Well, for a start, you don't know anything about me. And you certainly don't know about any achievements I may have made.
Originally posted by mckyle
Originally posted by RiotComing
It's amazing witnessing the vitriol and denial I am seeing here on this thread... and here I was thinking I was among friends on a conspiracy site!
That's a bit like the pot calling the kettle black, considering a very large number of your posts start out with a more or less denigrating'poke' at people who may potentially dare to question the argument being presented.
Originally posted by RiotComing
Of course they start out that way! But that is not 'vitriol and denial' - it's a vote of support for the OP!!
[edit on 12-5-2009 by RiotComing]
Originally posted by modern
reply to post by RiotComing
Seriously those are just a mess of compression marks and resizing algorithms… they really hold not analytical value at all. I'm sick of seeing people trying to analyse compression marks.
So if you don't understand anything about image or video compression then please don't try your hand at analysing images, its just ridiculous.