It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Who would be today's Oswald?

page: 1

log in


posted on May, 11 2009 @ 06:30 PM
Would it be a White male militia member?

How about a Black female college student influenced by rap music and Black Nationalism with a history of travel overseas in Muslim countries?

Perhaps a massive scandal of political or financial corruption would be the scapegoat?

I recall many people saying JFK wasn't going to complete his term and thinking that he would be trapped in scandal and forced out.

The disgust is nearly palpable and growing each day in the political and financial news.

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 06:42 PM
Most excellent question.

I'm torn.

White supremist, or Black Muslim fanatic?


I guess we'll have to wait and see.

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 07:34 PM
White militia seems to be a low level answer leading to anger amongst the Black community.

Black radical seems to be a better answer, perhaps instigated by a draft of millions of young black men into a war against Islam.

I also think financial scandal could do it just as easily.

U.S. citizen seems more likely than foreign agent. People would be driven to war by a foreigner. A local would be seen as a nutcase.

An accident would be astonishing, but would probably incense the Black community.

Let's get some think tank action going on here....!

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 07:35 PM
Osama bin laden. Good day.

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 08:25 PM
Sure, Osama Bin Laden could come out of hiding and demand that his followers defeat the enemy Commander.
That would make about as much sense as 9/11 and bring the same results... American troops pounding the crap out of some Muslim stronghold someplace.
Osama would be a terrific scapegoat.

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 09:18 PM
Barbara Who? Why should ethnicity or gender be a consideration? Certainly a young black female could end up being CEO of a corporation like Enron 30 years from now.

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 09:22 PM
no one because Obama has his arms up horizontally with the nice strings fit tightly around his arms?


posted on May, 11 2009 @ 09:31 PM
If Oswald was a patsy, and I quite frankly believe he was, then he fit quite nicely to the agenda of those behind the conspiracy.

All patsy's do.

So, lets for a moment imagine there is to be an assassination attempt. This would only be done by a group with an agenda. For that agenda to be successful the patsy would have to look like an enemy of their cause, They would not want the assassin to look like he was one of theirs.

Who the next patsy is depends on who is behind the conspiracy. They would paint a picture of that person to look like one of their enemies, set him/her in motion and after they would destroy them.

The first rule of a successful assassination is kill the assassin. That way they can't talk or provide any information that might link them back to you. (Whether they have any information or not.) That's why Oswald had to die.

The next Oswald will depend upon the agenda of those behind the conspiracy.

Just my thoughts,


[edit on 11-5-2009 by mrwupy]

posted on May, 11 2009 @ 09:51 PM
reply to post by THX-1138

That all depends on if he toes the NWO party line. When they decide that he's a liability, they'll use the person that will cause the most uproar.

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 02:25 AM

Originally posted by SpacePunk
reply to post by THX-1138

That all depends on if he toes the NWO party line. When they decide that he's a liability, they'll use the person that will cause the most uproar.

This is the correct answer. JFK was disposed of when he woke up, turned on his handlers, stuck to his principles and opted in a mission to destroy the Federal Reserve, expose the corruption in the CIA/MOSSAD, Mafia ties, destroy the military industrial complex which Eisenhower warned on in his 1961 farewell speech, and dare I say it... JFK (and Marilyn Monroe) also knew of the ET issue. He 'had to go', in other words (as was Abraham Lincoln).

Obama is facing an interesting historical parallel. At the moment he is toeing the NWO line, giving them what they want. But, let's say he reaches a point where a decision infringes his core principles.. and he decides to hold his ground.. he won't be assassinated based on the colour of his skin.. it will be simply because he turned on his handlers.

And whom are his handlers? They haunt the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group. A bunch of lowdown crooks.

[edit on 12-5-2009 by RiotComing]

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 05:01 PM
Wow. You guys are trying to turn this thread around.

Obama is working with Democrats to destroy America.

Republicans are working with America to save Her.

You all sound like you have fallen for the "both parties are the same" scam.

Remember JFK was a Democrat.

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 09:31 PM
reply to post by THX-1138

It doesn't matter which administration is in power, the people truly running the show are from the Bilderberg, CFR, and Trilateral Commission. This has been proven, time after time after time.

For an overview on how this works, watch the Alex Jones documentary 'The Obama Deception'.

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 09:59 PM
reply to post by RiotComing

If Obama managed to shake off his handler, and operate against the NWO expectations, it would be in the best interests of the United States to keep him alive. Ideally the military should step up, and protect him if that happens.

posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 03:53 AM

It's the disgruntled Muslim....

new topics

top topics


log in