It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Stimulus Watch: Road money skips over needy areas

page: 1

log in


posted on May, 11 2009 @ 04:45 PM
Obama's intial disbursement of $68 billion for "timulus projects" has largely ignored the neediest areas and gone to those with the least need an AP analysis shows:

Counties suffering the most from job losses stand to receive the least help from President Barack Obama's plan to spend billions of stimulus dollars on roads and bridges, an Associated Press analysis has found.

Although the intent of the money is to put people back to work, AP's review of more than 5,500 planned transportation projects nationwide reveals that states are planning to spend the stimulus in communities where jobless rates are already lower. The analysis also found that counties with the highest unemployment are most likely to have been passed over completely in the early spending.

Among them: Wheeler County, Ore.; Steuben County, Ind.; Macon County, Ga.; and Crowley County, Colo., Vermillion County, Ind.; Lapeer County, Mich.; Presidio County, Texas; Tallahatchi County, Miss.

Even before the election Obma aqnd Biden [i]promised that stimulus money would go to people looking for work, and communities hurt by layoffs and plant closures

"We cannot wait," Vice President Joe Biden said last week when announcing a $30 million transit project in his hometown of Wilmington, Del., where the 7.7 percent unemployment rate remains below the national average. "We're spending a lot of time and money. Why? It's about ... jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs. That's why we cannot wait."
"That's the core of my plan, putting people to work doing the work that America needs done," Obama said in a Feb. 11 speech promoting transportation spending as a way to expand employment.

But, that hasn't been the case.

One result among many: Elk County, Pa., isn't receiving any road money despite its 13.8 percent unemployment rate. Yet the military and college community of Riley County, Kan., with its 3.4 percent unemployment, will benefit from about $56 million to build a highway, improve an intersection and restore a historic farmhouse.

Altogether, the government is set to spend 50 percent more per person in areas with the lowest unemployment than it will in communities with the highest.

AP reviewed $18.9 billion in projects, the most complete picture available of where states plan to spend the first wave of highway money. The projects account for about half of the $38 billion set aside for states and local governments to spend on roads, bridges and infrastructure in the stimulus plan.

The very promise that Obama made, to spend money quickly and create jobs, is locking out many struggling communities needing those jobs. The money goes to projects ready to start. But many struggling communities don't have projects waiting on a shelf. They couldn't afford the millions of dollars for preparation and plans that often is required.

The early trend seen in the AP analysis runs counter to expectations raised by Obama, that road and infrastructure money from the historic $787 billion stimulus plan would create jobs in areas most devastated by layoffs and plant closings. Transportation money, he said, would mean paychecks for "folks looking for work" and "folks who want to work."

The AP findings suggest the White House raised expectations too high for the transportation spending, said a spokesman for Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. Needy communities are not benefiting most from transportation money, spokesman Jim Berard said.

"To some extent I think the administration oversold the transportation aspect of this," Berard said. "It was sold as the heart and soul of the package and it really just isn't."

Obama's plan sends $38 billion to states and local governments for roads, bridges, transit and other infrastructure, about 5 percent of the overall program that also includes money for, among other things, schools, community development, technology, worker training and tax breaks.

As the number of projects grows, many poorer communitites could still be left out because they could not afford the upfront costs needed to put proposals in the pipeline.


posted on May, 11 2009 @ 04:51 PM
I've found a website with which you can track the disbursement of stimulus money.

It is here:
"Interactive tracking stimulus money on a map"

This can be very enlightening as the money starts to flow.


posted on May, 11 2009 @ 05:19 PM
nice post, we received 3 more police and 5 cop cars, now that is change you can beleive in

need more jobs not jails. kinda, sorta, smelling like nazi germany

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 10:00 AM
reply to post by tatersalad
I move between S. Central Texas and Central Indiana. There are many communities in these areas that get nothing form these "stimulus" projects.

Just as the article noted, some cities and counties just don't have the money for big studies and expert-created grant applications. They suffer. This looks just like any other 'government contracts' boondoggle.

What a waste! Cities that don't need the money get tons of it, and we get to pay for it.


new topics

top topics

log in