reply to post by easynow
Note to Mods: I have been given specific permission by Bill Irvine to defend my website
Look, I don't expect to win you over in this debate and am not sure why I bother.
Your post contains serious flaws....as does your logic
Firstly my story on the French UFO incident did not claim to be backed by photo's and police reports and stated at the end that it was up to readers
to email French UFO organizations for more details.
As such it might have happened or might not have. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. I did not claim it was more than it was.
On the other hand Dorothy Izzat's claims contains many feet of footage: This leaves two options. Either it is a deliberate hoax or it is real (there
is a slight chance it is someone tricking Dorothy).
Here is why it cannot be real and why YOU not ME are the problem with ufology:
If indeed aliens were visiting Dorothy every other day in a manner that she could get a camera and film them, well why are we even talking. Why don't
or didn't we all just go down and witness light ships and Dorothy's. In fact why didn't the entire world just go and settle the UFO question at
If indeed she had the experiences you believe she did she would be a person of immense interest to all sorts of departments: not merely the subject of
a c-grade documentary spruiked on the Internet.
Sadly your lack of understanding has you believe that this is a first-rate documentary involving 'proof' by 'experts'. It isn't. I doubt I can
cure that problem.
That's right, advanced aliens constantly engage with this lady and it ends up in nothing more than a low-grade documentary.
It's the old 'that which is totally elusive to you is an everyday event to me' trick.
None of the footage is vaguely convincing. In saying that I do not dismiss outright the possibility that Dorothy might have been visited by aliens and
plan to look into this further.
Now to ANW:
I have made peace with the fact that aliens who ARE visiting earth DO NOT want humans (outside of a very small group) to have proof of their visits. I
happen to believe (if not know) that they are capable of all sorts of techniques to avoid this happening, including mind-control (Yes really).
Therefore I do not bother looking for non-existant photographic proof or even police reports. What I look for is sightings that fit into a pattern
that gels with what I have discovered to be the 'current situation'. The vast majority of sightings reported in ANW did occur and I could prove it.
Most are based on multiple unconnected witnesses ringing local news stations and police.
The fact that American ufology doesn't take an interest in them simply shows how far up the garden path YOU have been led. This doesn't mean they
never happened and with a few exceptions where I DID GET IT WRONG most of the stories are fact. Just not fact that fits into your cosy little, rather
[edit on 22-7-2009 by mikecohen1]