Where the Hell's a debunker when you need one?

hmmm still waiting on that u2u.... how can i debunk without the sources? haha oh rite- it's all nonsense k'thx.

Here is another thread that seems to have the link

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I haven't checked it out yet, just saw the other thread..........

nice, its been posted over here

www.abovetopsecret.com...

it's not as interesting as promised - haha what a shock! - just some very wide and vauge cold reading...

heres mine...

Another nonsense [tin merchant] will claim to be able to [predict future] after a flurry of [throwing mud at a wall] some of it will [predict future] and the desperate [idiot masses] forgetting that [trend analysis] is a vague and unreliable [science] will treat it like [a religion] using it to [avoid looking at the truth] - however they won't let it affect their [mind] because to believe in [predict future] rather than understand the dynamics of [trend analysis] automatically forces you to believe the future in unchangeable.

How did i do? can i be the new webbot? i hear the old one got depressed and killed himself (3 bullets to the back of the head)

Here is a youtube video regarding it. Still scouring google for more info. I will report anything interesting if i don't lose interest.

*TheAssociate chugs another cup of coffee*


TA

Edit to add: This sounds like one of those alternate reality games like Nine Inch Nails did to promote Year Zero (link). I wouldn't put too much stock in it.


TA

[edit on 9-5-2009 by TheAssociate]

I haven't read the reports, and as a programmer I think webbot is a bunch of nonsense.

Proof of this was that recent "major earthquake" prediction they made. And it didn't even come true. Perhaps not a big deal in itself, except when you consider there are between 8-10 "major" earthquakes every year. So such a prediction at any time has a decent chance of coming true, especially over a 2-3 month period. That no major earthquake happened in that time period is pretty much a nail in the coffin for being able to "predict" the future.

8-10 major earthquakes a year means on average almost 1 per month. So to predict an earthquake over such a long period of time I would think comes out statistically that you have a better chance of having a major earthquake than to go that long without one. But even with the odds in it's favor, it still failed to predict anything.

If someone could be so kind as to drop it my way I would really appreciate it. I'm going crazy with anticipation, and apparently I'm too new/lowly to get into RATS forum or even send a private message to anyone.

WhiskeySix

I have already debunked it. I wrote an essay on the debunking and posted it on the web. Search the web and find my debunking essay, and then post it here.