It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Afghan's Karzai Demands U.S. Halt Air Strikes: Report

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:23 PM
link   

www.newsdaily.com...




WASHINGTON, May 8, 2009 (Reuters) — Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Friday called on the United States to halt air strikes in his country, following attacks this week that Afghan officials said killed 147 people.

"We demand an end to these operations ... an end to air strikes," Karzai said in Washington in an interview with CNN.

Karzai said Obama in their White House summit on Wednesday had expressed "sorrows and apologies" over the deaths in Farah province.

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
uk.reuters.com
news.yahoo.com
www.nytimes.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
US denies 147 civilians killed in Afghan violence

[edit on 8-5-2009 by Darth_Prime]




posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:23 PM
link   
i wanted to post this after i read the post *see related threads* about the "US denies 147 civilians killed"

i think this should be intolerable, well on a higher level all these false wars are intolerable, and yet the sheeple are still okay with it cause we are fighting the war on "terrorism" which is just one more false war.

and at the same time trying to get other countries to attack us so we can get this whole WWIII Global Takeover up and running big time..


(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 8-5-2009 by Darth_Prime]



posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:30 PM
link   
Good luck with that. The military does not usually take its marching orders from the countries its invaded.



posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:34 PM
link   
reply to post by autsse
 


Even after we have allowed a government to be elected? What good is going into a country, deposing their government, installing a new one, and then disregarding them when they want you to leave/stop?

What do we do, kill the democratically (s)elected president of Afghanistan because he doesn't want us there? Oh wait, we have done that before.

What a wonderful message we send to the rest of the world, "we can invade you, replace you, ignore you and punish you."



posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:37 PM
link   
reply to post by niteboy82
 


Not to mention that many of the civilians that died ARE CHILDREN.

How in the hell can we say we promote freedom when we are KILLING CHILDREN!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?





posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:42 PM
link   
I think the man should get his wish. The Taliban will be back within weeks, Karzai will be executed, and the mass misery under fundamentalist Muslims will be once again in control.

Karzai forgets what saved him and his village back when he was just a nothing, and the Taliban was having its ass kicked by Special Forces directing one particular air strike, pulling his bacon out of the fire, just in the nick of time.

Since we're not over there to win, let's come on home and wait until we're attacked again.



posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:44 PM
link   
reply to post by niteboy82
 


I'm just saying this is how war works. The invading forces no matter who rarely bow to the demands of the locals.



posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:47 PM
link   
reply to post by autsse
 


That's BS.

If they can handle it, then let them.'

If they can't, we'll handle it.

If we handle it, they should shut the hell up.



posted on May, 8 2009 @ 11:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by niteboy82

What a wonderful message we send to the rest of the world, "we can invade you, replace you, ignore you and punish you."


that seems to be the motto of the USA, whats sad is people go a long with it, but they are so hypocritical, how would the mass sheeple that is all for us invading the middle east, killing children and innocent people,how would they like it if that happened to the US, if lets say china, or IRAN just came over invaded us, killed innocent people, took out our *false* elected puppet, and installed there own ideals ..


the sheeple wouldn't dig it too much man

[edit on 8-5-2009 by Darth_Prime]



posted on May, 9 2009 @ 12:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Darth_Prime
 


Well, if we in the US couldn't do a better job of protecting innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan, exporting terrorism, and training terrorists, we'd deserve it.

But we don't have an ass-backwards, primitive, bloody country full of total misery.



posted on May, 9 2009 @ 12:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by Darth_Prime
 


Well, if we in the US couldn't do a better job of protecting innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan, exporting terrorism, and training terrorists, we'd deserve it.

But we don't have an ass-backwards, primitive, bloody country full of total misery.




the US train just as many terrorist, how soon the US forgets the CIA trained Bin Laden, and funded/backed him from the beginning.

as well as many other terrorist that rose to dictatorship level


and if you really want to get down to the picky part of it, the US has as many "terrorist" as well



posted on May, 9 2009 @ 12:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Darth_Prime
 

I don't suppose you're talking about supplying Afghan fighters with weapons and ammo when their country had been invaded by the Soviet Union, are you?

You mean the weapons obtained by a Jewish arms dealer, who had to make a deal with the Egyptians, who had the weapons, and then provide them to the Afghanis?

Like providing Stinger missiles to shoot down Soviet helicopters and jets which were pounding villages and wholesale slaughter?

You mean THAT US support?



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join