NICE FIND!!! S&F for you! I like it even if it turns out to be bogus I still like it! lol which I doubt! this is what I kinda felt all along!

This would also explain alot! like the reason for all the cover up photo's ect. all the photo shopping! The disclosure project and this are probably the most vital pieces of information a person can have! I think there is more to come and much more than we are expecting.. at least for myself I was expecting less! im pleasantly surprised

I must say I like the false Horizon clip. The ones with the discs were clearly manipulated.

Do you realize this is from the Crit? The same people that brought us the 200000 old angel article. Guess that doesnt prove its a hoax, but....

great.

I cant wait to see it.

The question for me is who's ships are they? What are they doing there?

We must start to explore the next stage of ETs on the moon or elsewhere and their agendas.

These disc ships in the Clementine hd photos would be about 2 miles in diameter? Are these discs are the same as the sts shuttle (tether) discs?

They seem to be blue/metallic - what materials do we know of that could resemble that type of reflective metal (if it is metal)?

If they use the moon as a type of stop over - do they get fuel or food or anything else as it seems rational to do so.

So many questions we should all be asking, any more would only contribute to such a way of thinking.

wZn

It's not often something makes me to a double take. I'll have to dig into this on my own when I get home. Should be able to pull those same photos and crank up PS and see this false horizon stuff for myself. Is there any legitimate Occam's Razor type explanation as to why they would cut the horizon and around the earth out? The fade to back, as they say? I can't think of one myself.

The floating 'disks' I'm not so sure about, although it's certainly curious to say the least. It does look like they are pulling a bit of trickery with those new color photos, there's a tiny bit parallax between the disks and the moons surface and unless they're using stereoscopic pictures I call them on that as a bit of trickery to sell copies unless they can explain how they determine that these things are hovering off the surface a bit more. Could be some kind of surface feature that you only really notice in color pictures. Regardless, I still would like to know what these things are, they certainly stick out now in the new photos and warrant a closer look. You would think some of the hobby astronomers would have noticed something moving around the surface by now given the advancements in the area.

Very interesting so far....although what's this about some 20000 year old angel another poster mentioned? Is this guy (movie maker) credible?

i would be interested to see the film...but if they are going to hinge claims on clips taken from the Clementine images, it is going to make for a lot of "facepalm" while i watch it.

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
i would be interested to see the film...but if they are going to hinge claims on clips taken from the Clementine images, it is going to make for a lot of "facepalm" while i watch it.

Explain. Something up with the Clementine data?

I like your style Phage, direct, yet not arrogant.

Yet again we have another WWN-like article making the front pages. Stop that please. Nobody takes WWN seriously or any other affiliate, and having these stories on the main page of ATS will give all of these unique vistors the wrong impression about our true and serious discussions.

I saw today from the daily galaxy that the earth may have had two moons at one time! Neat stuff- anyone watch this movie?

Great another "valid source" from The Crit.

From the same valid source that brought us the 10" carving of an angel from there, I presume?
So, we are supposed to believe that a whole nation, led by generations of political figures have lied to us for over forty years about the moon landing? Well, I'll have to agree with you on that point.They have lied about almost everything. Hell, they lie even when the truth sounds better. However, I disagree with you on the validity of this source. I am tired of seeing this no-name website and scientific figures that we've never heard of being used as gospel for proof. Come at us with a legitamate source or just stop already.

This is a load of bollocks.

"no stars" in the photos??? Complete lack of credibility from a supposed 'expert'!!!!