The following are some of what are referred to as the best UFO cases that have left physical trace evidence behind
. Some of the cases contain
the most up to date research yet (as of 2009) and are the strongest evidence for the existence of what most assume to be extraterrestrial piloted
craft. This the compilation of those cases in a more condensed format, as I believe the greatest tool for any Ufologist or any form of UFO phenomina
truth seeking is to educate the masses with the best cases presented in a neutral, easy to read format so that everyone can make up their own mind.
For if we educate the masses we can get more peoples attention to this very real and serious topic.
The following are in chronological order starting with the most recent
The Bob White Artifact
Date and Location: 1985, Utah-Colorado boarder near Grand Junction
Witness: Bob White and friend
Image of artifact courtesy of ufoevidence.org
Image of Bob White courtesy of ufoevidence.org
This case has some breaking news that was just made public last night in the History Channels UFO Hunters
. We will get to that in a
moment, but first a brief history of the incident.
White and a friend were driving from Denver to Las Vegas on a desolate highway near the Colorado-Utah border. It was 2 or 3 a.m., he said, and
White was sleeping in the passenger seat. At one point, his friend woke him up and pointed out a strange light in the distance. White didn't think
much of it and went back to sleep.
Then his friend woke him up again. This time, White said, the lights were blinding.
He got out of the car and stared, dumbfounded. The object was about 100 yards in front of him, he said, "and it was huge ... absolutely huge."
In time, he said, the lights bolted toward the sky and connected with a pair of neon, tubular lights — "the mother ship," White guesses now. And
just like that, he said, the entire contraption zipped eastward through the Colorado sky and disappeared.
"What I saw," White said, "was not of this Earth."
As the craft flew away, White said, he noticed an orange light falling to the ground. A locator probe? Something that simply broke off? It was red hot
when he reached it, he said, but in time it cooled enough to pick up. White shoved the object into the trunk of the car.
The object is about 7-1/2 inches long and shaped like a teardrop. It has a coarse, metallic exterior and weighs less than 2 pounds. It looks a bit
like it could be a petrified pine cone and is composed primarily of aluminum.
Did the ‘Holy Grail’ of Ufology literally fall from the sky that night? Well Bob White has since had the object tested multiple times
such renown labs as Los Alamos National Lab. In 1996 White took a piece of the object to Los Alamos for testing, according to him the lab first stated
this object was of extraterrestrial nature, later they retracted this statement and gave him a “misleading” report on the object. I can not find
the actual copy of the test results but it was shown on last nights UFO Hunters
and is referenced in many research sites. It is important to
note that White also took and passed a polygraph test and signed a notarized statement of what happened that night. Interestingly enough further
research as shown some striking similarities with Mars….
Dr. Robert Gibbons, former scientist with NASA, and current Executive Director of the Museum, made this statement. "We recently came across
scientific data that linked Bob's object with the planet Mars.
Isotope abundance ratio tests were performed on Bob's object in May, 1999 in La Jolla, CA and the numbers are virtually the same as obtained from
Martian meteorite samples. The ratio of isotopes of Strontium for the QUE 94201 meteorite found in Antarctica in 1994 was 0.701. The ratio of isotopes
of Strontium for Bob's object was 0.712. The ratio of isotopes of Strontium for the Shergotty meteorite found India in 1865 was 0.723. Bob's object
is right in the middle of two proven Martian meteorites!"
The Martian meteorite data came from a scientific paper published on the website of the Planetary Science Research Discoveries, an educational website
supported by NASA's Office of Space Sciences and by the Hawaii Space Grant Consortium.
Dr. Gibbons is calling for more scientific tests on the Bob White object to prove its origin once and for all.
The most recent information on the artifact comes just recently as mentioned earlier. Two independent labs stated that the chemical composition of
this artifact “shouldn't exist” and shows complex isotopes and nano chemical structure, that even now (and especially in 1985) don’t exist. The
artifact is also apparently giving off some kind of radiation as well, this has been documented with dental x-ray films and mechanical malfunctions of
electronic safes. There have been over ten labs to study this artifact and the results have been oddly split down the middle, some labs say it is
nothing, but others say it is something extraordinary. In this case it seems the newest information is the most solid, currently there is no video
available online of last nights UFO Hunters
, as it is new. I will post it when I can get a hold of it. This is the hottest case in Ufology
right now (thus why this is the longest entry in my OP) and has some strong potential to break wide open. It is odd that this object is made up of
70% aircraft grade aluminum, as well many complex isotopes of aluminum and other rare elements.It is important to note that not all labs
have stated this is anything extraordinary, but considering the rest of the case and the reluctance of the labs to come forward and work with other
labs that did find something one could postulate that this is intentional disinformation, which is not unusual in cases in Ufology.
Over 10 labs have tested this object and some of the conclusions in favor (as the ones against simply said it was normal) are as follows:
*Dr. Robert Gibbons (former jobs; NASA, Northrop-Grumman, and Hughes)- Joined White in 2002 to help give his expertise as a physicist. As stated
before the electric safe where this object was stored at one time malfunctioned three days in a row as the object was doing something to the
batteries, draining the power. After this Gibbons ran a dental x-ray film exposure of the object and detected radiation coming from what he calls “2
lobes” in the object, the films match up to support this theory. The “lobes” look like two black spots in the center of the artifact.
* Los Alamos Isotope Abundance Test
- This is highly disputed and believed to be
disinformation directly from the United States government. White claims that after the initial test the lead doctor (which was called in special)
called and told him “I have been waiting for this my whole life”, he also reportedly repeatedly said “aluminum,aluminum” in the sense that he
detected complex isotopes of an unknown origin, which is what the original report was. However this was quickly changed according to White.
* Mass Spectrometry
- A few years ago a mass spectrometry test was run on the object and
apparently could not identify a small percentage of the object, which leads many to believe that is because it is an unknown and totally new
* Test Results from New Mexico Tech-
Image courtesy of greatdreams.com
White was not happy with the results of this test and stated he believed it was intentional disinformation. This is one of the tests that are
dismissive of his claim, but still shows the high aluminum content. Are they omitting something? Or do they not have the technology there( at the
time,which was 1996) to do a better analysis? Or are they telling the truth?
The following is the newest, most up to date information on the analysis of the artifact. This information was just released last
All information is from last nights episode of UFO Hunters on the History Channel
* Expert 1: Physicist Chris Ellis, expert in solid state physics, aluminum alloys, and superconductors. Test result showed the object is an alloy of
. It is also his expert opinion that this is a manufactured alloy.
[edit on 5/7/2009 by jkrog08]