Originally posted by Deaf Alien
Look at my avatar that I drew. Does that mean I am a member of Illuminati or satanic?
By the OP's logic, I am a follower of the Dark Lord.
Hey I sure do appreciate that many things in life have double meanings and sometimes one of those meanings have very special importance to people.
People sometimes call me a horse's ass...but when they do so in front of a Stud Stallion the horse seems to take exception when he tries to draw that
I don't think there is any chance that the OP or anyone would confuse a hearing disabled person using sign language as being Satanic or that those
who have a hard time hearing or have no hearing are in any way shape or form involved or inclined towards devil worship.
I sure could appreciate how a group of people who have to live with such an impairment who might be often and sometimes cruelly overlooked because of
their impairment sure might be very grateful indeed for the thought of or the very real action of someone very important paying homage to both them
and the alternative lifestyle their impairment has caused them to develop by from time to time using part of it's communication gestures, especially
as one as powerful and effecting as "I love you"
You know I don't know because I am not Hillary Clinton, or George Bush, or Gordon Brown, or Tony Blaire, or Barack Obama, or Laura Bush or any of the
many people caught on film and then recirculated by conspiracy theorists who know that Satanists use a similar sign.
I sure in no mean way wish to be disrespectful to that culture the hearing impaired have developed so they too can enjoy as much of the social
interaction as all human beings crave and long for. I don't imagine the OP does either...
You might though be able to consider and empathize with this better than most people...a lot of us are nervous, some of us are even frightened, and
some of us are even terrified about things we can't hear ourselves...privileged conversations between politicians and important people of wealth that
go on across the globe sometimes in far away places at a time where the world as become a much more uncertain place and much more difficult to make
our ways in.
They don't invite the press to those meetings, and they don't often release full transcripts of those meetings, and many people the world over are
finding not just politicians, and corporate leaders but the press as well harder and harder to trust in and believe as they jet all over the world
from one spot to another, holding these private meetings, about very important things, that effect us all alike and we can't hear or know for certain
what is being said.
So we look for clues, trying to calm and dismiss our fears or find some resolve in knowing the extent of the bad things that might come that we can
steel and prepare ourselves for when they come in the future.
In that process of secret diplomacy and backroom deals we aren't just deaf, and we aren't just deaf and blind, but we are deaf, dumb and blind,
because we can not speak to these people ourselves to ask them questions, and we can't see what goes on behind those doors, and we can't hear what
is being said and while many of us trust these people to lead us and many of us hope they will do so honesty, far too many of us do have a varying
levels of mistrust in them and what they do show us and tell us, because for most of us life keeps taking a turn for the worse and not for the better,
and we hope for and trust in them to do is make life better.
So much like someone who is hearing impaired all the time we look for nonverbal clues to fill in the blanks and between the lines of stories we are
often certain we are not getting the whole story of.
Fear is a hard thing to live with and a lot of that search for nonverbal clues is based on an inherent human desire to try to confront and overcome
our worst fears.
I know a little bit about the Occult, a fair bit about New World Order conspiracies, and virtually nothing I am sorry and a bit ashamed about the
hearing impaired community.
I do not know as part of their political process, civil outreach, charitable acts or special interest interactions in their past or present if some of
these people I cited above caught on tape giving this hand signal have a known relationship to the hearing impaired community or if there is a
universal relationship between the hearing impaired community and the political elite class to give this signal in public as a way of saying "I know
you are watching to and can't hear me at all because maybe this broadcast isn't closed captioned, I can't sign it for you but know that I love
you" as a way of reassuring the hearing impaired community that you aren't being overlooked by the politicians and leaders you have to place trust
and hope in too?
I can certainly understand and appreciate if they could do but one sign to let you know that you also are in their thoughts "I love you" would
without a doubt have to be the very best one and most reassuring and meaningful and special one to use.
If you know for a fact that's the case please know we sure aren't trying to intercede, denigrate or cast dispersions on that special relationship,
the hearing impaired or the people thoughtful enough to truly always remember and include them in a loving way.
But if for some reason you suspect or know that no, it's not a universal unwritten code, or widely held belief within the hearing impaired community
because no one like Laura Bush, or Hillary Clinton or Barrack Obama ever addressed a gathering of the hearing impaired in a way that they could
communicate directly with absolute clarity "And when ever you see me do this sign it's because I know they might not be doing close captioned and I
know you don't know exactly what's up, but I do love you all, and remind you of that by signing I love you" Politicians speaking to the hearing
impaired community that way sure would be pretty definitive.
Now having said that, I would like to ask you directly if that is truly the case or something similar...
Or is it just a widely held belief amongst the hearing impaired that a bit of your culture has been adopted by certain people to silently but visibly
say to someone special they know in the scene these films shoot and capture "I love you" discreetly because the pomp and circumstance of the moment
of the First Lady and the President getting off their Helicopter might not be the best time or place to pause with the world watching on camera and
say "Thank goodness we landed back on mother earth, it's always a risk flying, "I love you".
If it is that second one, just a shared unspoken belief that important people are adopting a part of the hearing impaired culture which would of
course be flattering and reassuring if so that more and more people saw the value in knowing sign...
Then please if I might ask you then ask yourself this and share if you will...
Have you seen such notable people use other sign symbols in situations that aren't closed captioned where they are directly simultaneously speaking a
little to the hearing impaired community and if so can you tell us what signs they are also using and mean. If you think they are doing it to just
silently and discreetly communicate with one another using sign, but not for the specific purpose of including the hearing impaired what other signs
have you seen them using when communicating this way to one another...and what do they mean if you could share that with us please.
Now if anything I have just pointed out or asked has caused any alarm bells to go off or maybe cause you to rethink in some way what you believe they
mean when signing "I love you" or other signs, you might as part of that want to ask, how come they are just communicating their love to the hearing
impaired, how come when they are that important, and the event being captured on mainstream media film is that important it isn't being closed
caption, are their many people who are hearing impaired that don't have access to TTY or closed caption TV sets because of economic or living
circumstances? Are you absolutely certain each and every occurrence you have seen the "I love you" sign when it wasn't being verbalized or fit the
social setting that it did fit the social setting. In other words when two heads of state are in the midst of an important conversation the because of
it's gravity effecting us all, there is really someone out there in their immediate field of view or can immediately see them from their field of
view that the bit of distraction it takes from the serious conversation or moment is the kind of appropriate behavior an important leader might
indulge in without violating the trust we place in him or the protocol of a situation, in other words is it being done in a situation in a way like a
kid supposed to be paying attention to a teachers important lesson who is instead making a paper airplane and tossing it when he really ought to be
paying absolute attention.
No I don't think you are an occultist or an Illuminati but someone who could share a lot and shed a lot of light on this subject which is why I would
like to and have asked you so many more questions in response to your one.
I know I would appreciate answers for these questions if you can, or anything else you could clue us in on or help us with so because we too sometimes
can't 'hear' we worry and become alarmed and sometimes scared about what might really being said.
Thanks a lot friend.